|
|
|
|
Title: Richard Dawkins stumped by creationists' question (RAW FTGE)
Added: Apr 5, 2007
Author: JJjayco
Duration: 1:55
Description:
**MUST READ!! http://creation.com/dawkins-stumpedAnd for a true timeline of events on the actual day of filming, see here (VERY INTERESTING READING):http://www.tccsa.tc/video/timeline.pdfand for further reading still (it's somewhat technical and long, but underlines that the question cannot be answered in a way that supports evolutionary notions):http://www.trueorigin.org/dawkinfo.aspRichard Dawkins is dumbfounded after being asked to "give an example of a genetic mutation or an evolutionary process which can be seen to increase the information in the genome" - quite a reasonable question that one would expect Oxford University's Professor for the Public Understanding of Science - so adamant in his belief in evolution - could and would provide an answer for.He then responds but DOES NOT answer the question that was asked of him. Why? Because he has no idea when it comes to processes that add information to the genome - the very premise of what he proclaims!! His writings claiming that he was not stumped are a desperate endeavour to cover his cowardly tracks (and on a further note, his writings don't cover any of these "information adding" processes either).Check out the URL on the video (or above) for THE REAL EXPLANATION OF EVENTS!! And for even more insight into Dawkins' lack of enthusiasm to be interviewed by creationists, check out the belowmentioned CD. Dawkins was put to shame in a debate against creationists in 1986 at Oxford University and was left so speechless and defeated that he decided never to grant creationists with publicity time again - this policy was adopted not because he simply does not want to grant creationists with the publicity as he so cowardly insists, but because he is terrified his reputation will be tainted by his inability to front up to creationist arguments head-on (as this YOUTUBE video proves). The CD is available from the following link:http://creation.com/OxfordDon't be as "ignorant" as creationists allegedly are - delve a little deeper and you will be surprised at what you'll find.NB: The reasons for posting this video is not to disprove evolution or to prove creation - but merely to show that this man who is at the forefront of the modern-day evolutionist movement does not have an answer for the most fundamental question to what he proclaims. There are actually three processes [at the time of writing] that scientists know of that add information to the genome - none of which Dawkins covers in any of his responses - websites, books or otherwise.
Related Videos:
Videos related to 'Richard Dawkins stumped by creationists' question (RAW FTGE)'
Channel: People
Tags: dawkins creationism evolution genetics creation ministries genome
dawkins creationism evolution genetics creation ministries genome
Youtube Comments: 174
DRFEELGOOD331 Says:
Jun 19, 2007 - HE blinked 44 times before saying a word.=]
bitstudio Says:
Jun 19, 2007 - I too was once blind, but now I see. Pray for these people who put their faith in "experts" who sell them a "modern" religon.
imurban Says:
Jun 21, 2007 - Wow! Did I miss it, or did he completely gloss over the actual question?
rastinchacha7 Says:
Jun 24, 2007 - Even kids understand that their Christmas/birthday gifts did not materialise out of thin air, but were PLACED THERE BY SOMEONE, though they did not see them.We all know that the existence of every Tangible Product can be traced to a Responsible Maker/Agent. (Eg, buildings, cars, ships, roads, computers, crime, whatever).The hypocrisy of atheists is the belief in the above principle, but the blatant denial of the same principle where earth/humans are concerned.
darpachief Says:
Jun 25, 2007 - looooooool....stumped like a polititian. Sounds like Tony Blair lieing.
Constantine99999 Says:
Jul 13, 2007 - Err, well, ummm, doh! Great video!
JJjayco Says:
Jul 22, 2007 - RESPONSE PART 1 of 2Dr Collins' response glosses over the huge problems involved in theistic evolution - the God of the Bible is the Father of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, who believed in a real Flood, a literal Adam and Eve who literally fell into sin, and a recent creation (in which people were there from the beginning of the creation, not millions of years later, towards the end of some long creation process - see Mark 10:6).
JJjayco Says:
Jul 22, 2007 - RESPONSE PART 2 of 2To believe in theistic evolution means believing that God called billions of years of suffering, death, extinction, bloodshed and cruelty 'all very good' - and not the results of the Fall and the subsequent Curse on Creation, as the Apostle Paul understood it. creationontheweb . com /content/view/3055/ Copy this URL into your browser to see other articles on this topic.
JJjayco Says:
Sep 5, 2007 - RESPONSE PART 1 of 2Dr Collins' response glosses over the huge problems involved in theistic evolution - the God of the Bible is the Father of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, who believed in a real Flood, a literal Adam and Eve who literally fell into sin, and a recent creation (in which people were there from the beginning of the creation, not millions of years later, towards the end of some long creation process - see Mark 10:6).
JJjayco Says:
Sep 5, 2007 - RESPONSE PART 2 of 2To believe in theistic evolution means believing that God called billions of years of suffering, death, extinction, bloodshed and cruelty 'all very good' - and not the results of the Fall and the subsequent Curse on Creation, as the Apostle Paul understood it. creationontheweb . com /content/view/3055/ Copy this URL into your browser to see other articles on this topic.
JJjayco Says:
Sep 5, 2007 - Hi guys. Those interested in reading comments that have been posted, you will need to click "SHOW SPAM MESSAGES" (you may have to click "page2" of comments first). Someone has gone through and marked all comments as SPAM and they therefore do not get listed automatically. Sorry for the inconvenience.Regards, JJjayco
AndyIrida Says:
Jun 3, 2009 - Why is this guy famous?
joesports7 Says:
Jun 3, 2009 - That is hilarious. I would bet a large sum of money that if someone were to repost this video, titling it "Richard Dawkins Proves Evolution", most evolutinists, and theistic evolutionists specifically, would treat it as science and compromise their beliefs yet again.Evolution is a joke. When I have money someday, I will put a million dollar reward up for anyone who can bring me proof of evolution.
Jasong9573 Says:
Jun 4, 2009 - Mercy, mercy, Mr. Dawkins. What a shame. Thank you for the video.
xIsaiah2x Says:
Jun 6, 2009 - he didnt answer the question at all
Jer0mmel Says:
Jun 13, 2009 - LOL XD lmao rofl !!!
FAITHandLOGIC Says:
Jun 13, 2009 - LOL
Jdpteam Says:
Jun 13, 2009 - lol hahahhaa! Stupid Evolutionist!
yellowcanarystudios Says:
Jun 13, 2009 - lol hes clueless!!
20091cali Says:
Jun 14, 2009 - hahaahaha!!! noooo..he wanted to say that he is a fish, with the memorie status of 3 second.... :)
buschmann69 Says:
Jun 15, 2009 - Dawkins doesn't believe in evolution deep down in his heart, BUT, he realises that he can become well known and earn a lot of money writing dumb books, because human beings are so vulnerable !!
Sabianfan Says:
Jun 15, 2009 - ☻ /▌\ I AM CREATED ! / \
pittland44 Says:
Jun 15, 2009 - wow, he is a bigger weasel than I had previously thought.
englishjames007 Says:
Jun 15, 2009 - so where's your missing link then?.... you idiot, just accept that there's things beyond you and us all... apart from proven statements from Jesus Christ, and his forebearers.... just have faith instead of trying to disprove something your quite clearly not qualified to comment on
b0mb4kl4t Says:
Jun 18, 2007 - All these people having malice towards Richard Dawkins. I think he can be an asshole, but he's still one of God's creatures. He is not unworthy of God's love. Jesus still came to die for him. I think that Richard Dawkins really needs to be held up in prayer, rather than scoffed at by the church. Show a little compassion towards him.