Jude Law fights back at Charlie Brooker & Marina Hyde - Repo Men Interview with Forest Whitaker

SwingRiots Says:

Aug 19, 2010 - Charlie Brooker is right about everything.

rastabus Says:

Aug 26, 2010 - Maybe I would have some respect for Jude Law, if he didn't just call Angelina Jolie Angie, no, but I wouldn't, not really...

jdofb Says:

Aug 26, 2010 - jude law seems deluded by the fact that people dont like actors or musicians telling them about donating money to charity on the sole idea that its because there famous it has nothing to do with that i resent people who have more money than the majority of people will see in a life time berating me to donate money. and the idea is totaly fucking idiotic as if the taliban will wind up and go oh yeah lets all have a cease fire for a day i mean he calims they did but how do they know ?

addyads75 Says:

Aug 27, 2010 - As articulate as Jude is he doesn't talk about the celebs whose motives are far from sincere when involved with charity work. Around March/April this year there were some strong rumours circulating that a U.S publication was working on breaking a story of a David Beckham U.S affair (s). In May when The Sun had the Beckham in Afghanistan exclusive it did not suprise me in the slightest. That is one celeb whose motives to me are truly transparent.

ScrewAttackEurope Says:

Aug 28, 2010 - What a waste of time, there wasn't a single mention of Brooker in that video.

b0b1919 Says:

Aug 28, 2010 - I think you'll find it's 'Brooker' not 'Booker'

antipop55 Says:

Sep 4, 2010 - is jude law a robot, at 6:25 ive never seen anyone stay still for so long

RobinDylanJones Says:

Sep 4, 2010 - We find it hard to raise funds without people like "Angie"?? I work in the charity sector (for a small NGO) and can vouch that it is definitely not an imperative to have celebrity backing. It can be useful, but we wouldn't find it hard to run without them like Jude thinks.

antonb1983 Says:

Sep 15, 2010 - jude missin the point with brooker

YourTubeSpellChecker Says:

Sep 16, 2010 - Jude Law seems to think that he's the British Noam Chomsky or something. He seems good natured enough, but Jude, we don't need you and your celebrity friends to know what's going on in the world.

neil865 Says:

Sep 20, 2010 - Jude Law looks a lot like Eminem in the poster!

blondgurl9 Says:

Sep 21, 2010 - I agree with Jude on this one :P

itchcitizen2 Says:

Sep 21, 2010 - Brooker is the man !

sLAUGHTER115 Says:

Sep 26, 2010 - good for him. he's got the money. he's using it help others.

32371 Says:

Oct 1, 2010 - Thank you so much! You saved 6 minutes of my life

xoxokimberly1 Says:

Oct 3, 2010 - Jude comes off in this interview as smart and well-informed...and so what if he has opinions and goes on a "rant" (which wasn't really what that was at all, to be honest...) We all do it. The only difference is that he's in the public eye. If he wants to offer an opinion on an issue or an organization or even a person, he should be able to do it just as the rest of us are.

oldudereeno Says:

Oct 9, 2010 - shut up dude !!! booooring, charlie brooker is groovy right all the time man

DSQueenie Says:

Oct 10, 2010 - Starts talking about the subject @ 6:20Just bumping it up, because it is so TL;DR

cooljules19 Says:

Oct 15, 2010 - i intensely dislike Marina Hydes contributions to the Guardian.

topjolly Says:

Oct 18, 2010 - I don't usually criticize people for mispronouncing words but the solemn, poignant expression on his face when he reveals his ability to part the seas of conflict by reminding the world that a day of 'cessTation' exists was way too tragic. Nice t-shirt/jacket too...

thedeadloader Says:

Nov 1, 2010 - You know what people. You can still have your negative views about jude law, and generally i do, or used to. He seemed genuine, and yeah perhaps the tint of, "this is for my good looks" was in there. Generally though wouldn't you? I mean you're suggesting that you wouldn't make yourself look good to do something good? The fact is people are so cynical being born with the media as their demon. So if the only way to attract more people is by being a slave to the idiots. Do it. as long as it's FAGC

sc400575 Says:

Nov 5, 2010 - Charlie Brooker is funny and often shockingly accurate but he also makes attacks without being in possession of salient facts because it is his job to be controversial, and to be funny at other peoples' expense. That is the life he inhabits and I'm sure he feels as uncomfortable with that deep down as people like me thinks he should.He should go out there himself and learn these things first hand and then maybe lend his fame to a cause which can make many lives slightly better.

Mattgotsoul Says:

Nov 5, 2010 - I seriously doubt people like Angelina Jolie or Jude would do these things for charity if they knew it would have no bearing on their careers or public persona. But why do we need Celebrities getting involved in these things, when ultimately the message has been used for celebrity gain or lost completely in order to build on a celebrites profile. I know this says more about our society, but they play towards this and the media have manipulated this without restraint for years.

255ad Says:

Nov 9, 2010 - Jude Law seems to think that no one should have a go at any thing critical or cynical about any thing bad. OH and I didn't know this but Jude Law gave all his money to charity nice bloke, that or he's a massive hypocrite

255ad Says:

Nov 9, 2010 - newswipe was also trying to make the point that it's harder to criticise celebrities because they can get away with more the spokes persons because the people interviewing them don't wont them too leave because they don't just wont to talk about the charities