Go Raw Now Trailer

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 17, 2007 - By the way, your (or as you might say you're) spelling and sentence structure is that of a ten year old. You may want to consider this when trying to talk down to people.

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 17, 2007 - By the way, your (or as you might say you're) spelling and sentence structure is that of a ten year old. You may want to consider this when trying to talk down to people.

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 17, 2007 - Sorry for the change of message, read my previous reply: "My answer to your question is yes"

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 17, 2007 - You obviously have great faith in your beliefs, why not tell me why you think chemotherapy is a bad thing? "Step Up and discuss the subject" you seem unwilling to do this.

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 18, 2007 - You clearly have NO grounding in the biological sciences. We live in the year 2007, more than 100 years after this primitive treatment happened. Nowadays, we have a sophisticated understanding of how the body works, and how disease works. Five years ago I was diagnosed with appendicitis, and had my infected appendix removed the same evening. If I had not been lucky enough to live in an age of sophisticated surgical techniques an antibiotics, I would have died in two weeks.

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 18, 2007 - I would either have died through the infection spreading to all my vital organs (if I was not operated on) or from loss of blood during the operation, or from post surgical infections. If you can tell me a more effective way of treating appendicitis, or cancer, than those used in modern western medicine; be my guest and make it public, NOW. You WILL receive the next nobel prize for medicine. If not, keep your trap shut about subjects about which you know nothing.

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 18, 2007 - I did watch your video, and it turns out that the sources are slightly less reliable than you may think. The author calls himself "Dr" when in fact he has no Phd. Am I supposed to trust him? I HAVE challenged your previous points and offered some of my own, to which you have not responded to. I have already wasted too much time with you, I will leave you to wallow in your own shit.

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 18, 2007 - Don't even try and patronize me you stupid shit. There is so much wrong with EVERYTHING that you have said and unfortunately there is nowhere near enough room in the reply box to correct it all, and I cant even be fucking arsed. You are a waste of time and taxpayers money. I suppose I will have to rely on the intelligence of readers of this dialogue to judge for themselves.

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 22, 2007 - Don't lie. Although I suppose that's what you are all about right? "I don't know about something, so I will just make it up!"

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 22, 2007 - Fuck you cuntface.

JvdB2007 Says:

Nov 22, 2007 - they dont have a strong story, sure, charismatic speaker, and nice "convincing" way to bring it to the audience, but its not at all about why eating raw food is best... all they say is pizza is bad for you, duh i know that! that doesnt mean you should stop eating warm food altogether? there was absolutely nothing in this video to back that up

bauhearse Says:

Nov 22, 2007 - johan zwijg!

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 22, 2007 - "Oh look at me, I am a stupid whoretwat who dont understand words" I cant believe I even replied to your stupid fucking comments. What a waste of time. You are so much below me it is ridiculous. You think you are oh so clever, but you can do nothing but throw up shit from your mouth and talk out of your arse. blargheghfdherbbjsbddfjfhbejheh, people like you should be institutionalized into a fucking science class.

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 22, 2007 - Twat

rjfc2 Says:

Nov 24, 2007 - Sorry, I replied to the wrong conversation. I was actually talking about RUSHFANN1. I have had my own little dialogue with him. Bit of a stupid twat isnt he? (emphasis on the words STUPID and TWAT)

jan1080 Says:

Nov 24, 2007 - I dare you to show me repeated scientific studies of people "Going raw" and gaining muscle mass. Of course, you can't eat eggs, because they're just a precursor to the meat "chicken".Show me.

jan1080 Says:

Nov 24, 2007 - Speaking of cows:I don't know, GROWTH HORMONE filled chowder perhaps?I used to live on a farm. Cows do not just live on grass. And proteins are meant to be divided into amino acids to supply the body with, so you can rebuild muscle (e.g. leucine, which is an amino acid) and tons of other things. If your protein is converted into energy, then it's time to carb up. Where is the protein though? Show me three examples of Raw foods with protein contents past 4 grams per 100 gram of food.

jan1080 Says:

Nov 25, 2007 - Yeees, I don't see the difference between aminos and proteins... Like... I don't know, how e.g. a whey protein consists of 20 different aminos, and takes longer time to utilize than a pure amino acid because it needs to be broken down in the liver first, while an amino already is broken down, that kind of difference?

jan1080 Says:

Nov 25, 2007 - My mental prison of eating available food, and not restricting myself to 1/10th of the food pyramid. I fail to see your point. If anyone's "free" here, that would be me, considering I am the one who can freely eat whatever I want to, whereas you have to eat a very limited diversity of food.How come you ALL can only come up with one book? Of course you're going to believe the whole fad if you only read the positives, and don't take into account other sources meaning other things.

adivj Says:

Nov 25, 2007 - Very interesting. The bronzed woman with the wings reminds one of eighties scifi/fantasy illustrations. Haha.

jan1080 Says:

Nov 27, 2007 - I'd rather read scientific studies than a book written by a biased "go raw" author. It's the same as Mein Kampf by Hitler. The book might seem to make some kind of sense, but it still doesn't make it correct, because it's heavily biased towards one side.

jan1080 Says:

Nov 27, 2007 - I'd rather analyze and see theories that have yet to be disproven than read a book which simply says "A and B work together, right? That means C has to be the best choice for this!" Scientific studies actually TEST this stuff. Books tend to just be written by people who like the stuff they're reading about.

jan1080 Says:

Nov 27, 2007 - ... wow. By making a comparison of two biased books, I'm now officially a Hitler fan. Incredible. Too bad my granddad sunk his subs during WW2. I'd rather read scientific reports showing how "going raw" is better in all ways compared to eating veggies and nuts etc, while at the same time eating meats.

JvdB2007 Says:

Dec 3, 2007 - i feel like air sometimes.. hm says enough for me, malnutricion

Pandaneer Says:

Dec 12, 2007 - I'm pretty sure at this point that RUSHFANN is the RAWESOME version of the Time Cube guy.