|
|
|
|
Title: Danish scientist Niels Harrit debunked 1/3
Added: May 4, 2009
Author: jarii12366
Duration: 9:7
Description:
Made with help from RKOwens4, debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.
Related Videos:
Videos related to 'Danish scientist Niels Harrit debunked 1/3'
Channel: Tech
Tags: niels harrit danish scientist nano thermite 911 wtc debunking
niels harrit danish scientist nano thermite 911 wtc debunking
Youtube Comments: 864
Zooney1 Says:
Jun 26, 2011 - Where is your evidence for this comment? Harrit is a highly credentialled Chemistry Professor. What are you?
GLICKTON Says:
Aug 29, 2011 - i think they did very well explaining this but i still dont believe the buildings just fell, 3 buildings all falling into their own footprint supposedly from fire or being weakened due to impact of the planes yet we all know building 7 wasnt even hit by a plain and only a small part of it caught fire, everyone knows the government are lying they just dont want to admit it or accept that their own government could do this to their own
GLICKTON Says:
Aug 29, 2011 - they think the government care about them and just want to keep them safe lol, as for hearing no explosives which you would normally hear exploding when a building is demolished, this suspect nano thermite does not explode, it ignites and melts, you would only see plooms of smoke which do actually apear on some other footage.
GLICKTON Says:
Aug 29, 2011 - whats so hard about believing the government is not a person who cares for you, its made up of buisness people, all they care about is money, its not an entity, its a system made up of sneeky idividuals who like to tell people what to do, boss people around, earn lots of money, that is their mind set, how can a government care? lol, they dont give a fuck about anything except lining their pockets and thats the truth, we all know this stop protecting them, they shit on the ppl constant everyday
40joel Says:
Oct 6, 2011 - This video completely ignores that nano thermite was found by several sources in the wtc dust
kentekent Says:
Oct 13, 2011 - The ONLY thing Harrit can prove is that the thermite was there. The rest is speculation.
Viracocha711 Says:
Oct 28, 2011 - He can't even prove that! If he could then there would be a HUGE number of scientist all over this...But that is simply not the case. Sorry.
kentekent Says:
Oct 28, 2011 - After careful evaluation I have to agree with with you :)
suitmeup1 Says:
Oct 30, 2011 - The 3D model shows that the core of the tower still stands. Can you debunk that?
aczjbr Says:
Nov 29, 2011 - A&E truth now has help in spreading the lie that biochemistry, pretends to be a forensic expert. In my country it is the explosive "dirty sand" in steel. It is used and industrial paints. He found the rest of the painting of the towers. I´m not alone, all the universities and engineering schools in the U.S., Brazil, Western Europe, Australia and Asia. See what was found in France against A&E truth and their lies
aczjbr Says:
Nov 29, 2011 - URGENT-FRAUD "A&E Truth"-FRANCEEffondrement des tours jumellesThe analysis of the explosives expert Jowenko was used by conspiracy theorists to show that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished. In the same interview, he explains that the controlled demolition of the twin towers is impossible. Dynamite would have exploded right away, and it would have taken a year to put everything in place. in English.w w w . dailymotion . com/video/x2l5k9_effondrement-des-tours-jumelles_news
Thetan1974 Says:
Feb 27, 2012 - Err, does a huge number of scientists not being all over this prove that the (nano) thermite was not there.Koo-kook.
h87gj Says:
Mar 23, 2012 - Harrit is not a scientist. He's a conspiracy theorist.These terms are mutually exclusive. One cannot be a rational scientist and a lie-paddling preacher at the same time. No.
EcstasyMovie Says:
Mar 30, 2012 - that is ridiculous. He's a scientist that looks at the forensic evidence and asks questions. Because he asks questions, he's a "conspiracy theorist"? total bullshit. It's because people like you that the perpetrators of 9/11 continue to get away with it.
EcstasyMovie Says:
Mar 30, 2012 - And fires were NOT burning in WTC at 900 degrees. People were looking out the window at the crack and a firefighter said he needed TWO LINES to extinguish the fires... Within minutes, the entire building imploded onto itself and tore itself to pieces. Steel was pushed out 500 meters away. Steel and concrete were pulverized to dust. 100 floors. Nothing can do that except explosives. The plane fires were pretty much out. Then a SUDDEN collapse. Open your eyes for fuck's sake
h87gj Says:
Apr 1, 2012 - Wrong dipshit.Harrit was already a full blown twoofer before he published his joke thermite "evidence". He used the reverse scientific method. Meaning: "I conclude there was thermite. Now I will do some testing to find it."This is the same bullshit that creationists pull off. You're basically an idiot for seeing that.
h87gj Says:
Apr 1, 2012 - not seeing that*
EcstasyMovie Says:
Apr 1, 2012 - what's your fact based argument? It's obvious that they were controlled demolition. I think people just don't want to face it. He didn't use the reverse scientific method. He tried to test the primer paint and every argument. Why can't you ask questions about the event? Why must you accept 19 hijackers when there are so many unanswered questions that do NOT add up?
h87gj Says:
Apr 1, 2012 - Are you a fucking moron? How old are you?Still visiting high school or dropped out already? I bet you saw Loose Change and sucked all those "facts" in like the gullible conspiracy dipshit that you are. I'm not even going to waste my time explaining the scientific method to some part time dishwasher working at Joe's tavern.
EcstasyMovie Says:
Apr 1, 2012 - University graduate actually in psychology. I'm interested in seeing how people are in denial over the facts. I mean it's difficult to believe that a country can do that to their own people. All you really have to do is look at the history, Operation Northwoods, the pentagon not showing clearly that it was hit by a plane, WTC steel (evidence) removed from the scene.The entire thing doesn't add up. The official story has more flaws and needs more investigation. You need to step back and look
EcstasyMovie Says:
Apr 1, 2012 - I also love how you reply by calling people "fucking morons" and taking personal shots at people you haven't met before. Calling me a part-time dishwasher working at Joe's tavern clearly shows that you don't know what you're talking about. Making ridiculous accusations with no basis of fact.All anyone really has to do is look at the evidence of what happened and understand that the entire thing does not add up. WTC7 is one of the many things that do not make sense. It's never talked about!
EcstasyMovie Says:
Apr 1, 2012 - Think about it. I don't know who you are or what you believe. But really.. just think about it. Why wasn't WTC7 mentioned everyday on the news? If they really wanted to find proof/evidence of the 9/11 crime, they would investigate the HELL out of it. Also, why are reports of "explosions" (countless live witnesses) not even mentioned post-9/11.These are some of the MANY questions that do not add up. You can't just believe everything you are told by the mainstream media. I'm trying to help
ctcole77 Says:
Apr 6, 2012 - Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific ConsultantsWTC Dust Study2/28/2012"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments." "There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
rubenvdpol Says:
Apr 16, 2012 - isnt that what science is?ur just shouting at someone beceause having qeustions. And bashing creationists? I thought it was Darwin who thought there wasnt such a thing as a creator and then started to search for prove for evolution, thats the way science works...












Zooney1 Says:
Jun 26, 2011 - Well seeing your childish comments I see you are not exactly a very highly evolved individual.The composition of the nanothermitic material was primarily iron oxide and extremely fine grain aluminium in intimate admixture - a high tech form of thermite in fact that doesn't form randomly in collapsing buildings. Paint chips don't burn to form iron microspheres this stuff does. Enjoy your continuing ignorance.