In Praise of the 5th Amendment - part 3

BleedingSunday Says:

Feb 15, 2010 - in case of kidnaps; most of them are the mother..

victoriashokri Says:

Mar 1, 2010 - Excellent clip. Thank you

702dirtrider Says:

Mar 24, 2010 - Great video, man our system is screwed up, its almost immoral to be a police officer or prosecutor.

thered702 Says:

May 28, 2010 - dont need a lawyer. that puts you in teir juridiction. just do not consent. dont say ANYTHING not even your name. NOTHING.

a2zhandi Says:

Jun 27, 2010 - I see it as Satan's work.

brokkenstar Says:

Jul 22, 2010 - Give this professor a piece of raisin pie, excellent lesson, and never consent to a search, especially if you got something to hide (4th Amendment).

trentzanek Says:

Aug 4, 2010 - you stoopid ass,domestic violence means it was done by a family member.otherwise it would be assault...how much reserch did you have to do to figure out that domestic violence is assault on your family member...dumb ass.you got to be american.

BakerAero Says:

Sep 5, 2010 - "gangland style slaying doesn't imply anybody was shot" ....He's playing semantics here like a good lawyer. What does 'slaying' imply? That a bunch of people were treated to delicious dinner and a back massage for dessert?

Jaguwarps Says:

Sep 30, 2010 - Apparently, you weren't listening either. The trick question was "How many people did the police find SHOT to death". The original article didn't say anything about shooting. It could have been a knife, or a hanging, or any number of other way gangsters IN THAT AREA (it varies depending on the gangs, you know, and not all gangs are present everywhere) might choose to make an example of people in their "gangland style slaying".

Jaguwarps Says:

Sep 30, 2010 - In fact, if you were really paying attention, you would have noticed at least three different theories as to the motive and possible trigger for these deaths (gangland, murder/suicide, plain murder).Pay attention! :0

donze52 Says:

Nov 24, 2010 - back in the 1960's an FBI told us the same thing, with a twist, he said, when ask by law enforcement, always say you be more than glad to answer any questions, as long as they are in in writing so your lawyer can look at them first, and you will return the answers in writing, never on tape, so you keep a copy.....

donze52 Says:

Nov 28, 2010 - there are 158,000 laws on the books,only one law protects you though,the law suit,g men fear a billion dollar law suit more than bullets,city, counties and states as soon as you say law suitthey know it is going to cost them bundleskeep your micro tape recorder handydoesn't hurt to have stuffffffffff on the local judge and county attorney either, if push comes to shove.

fshfanatic Says:

Jan 3, 2011 - Domestic violence also means it could in fact be an act of violence against someone you live with, ie a roommate, you do not have to be related to someone to commit domestic violence against them, Seems you are the dumbass..

herpderp4 Says:

Mar 31, 2011 - FUCK THE POLICE

system0system0 Says:

Apr 20, 2011 - talking x 5 speed fast.

2046november Says:

Jul 19, 2011 - There will be crimes as long as there are laws defining something as illegal. Most laws are absurd and cause more harm than their violation. Law enforcement is the way 'democracies' use to confiscate peoples' assets and inflict us with fear of freedom.

SPQR62 Says:

Aug 19, 2011 - I feel like an idiot, I made a mistake too and now I fear I may go to jail.

pluto4847 Says:

Oct 28, 2011 - Yeah fuck the police, especially European police. 

cincykid51 Says:

Nov 14, 2011 - wish i would have saw this about three years ago, was accused of something i didnt do and thought by talking to the detective i would just be clearing my name and give him info to do this. they turned iit around on me and after four hours(dealing in stolen property) of interogation and took me to jail after i asked for a lawyer. it ended up there word oover mine and i ended up gettin a witheld of a judification with 2 years probation 1200 in fines and 20 days in jail for something i didnt do

geminieast11 Says:

Jan 6, 2012 - The innocent Plea was removed in 1964 this si why you always here them say are they here No ! well that is when the States takes it up ! Is the state the injured party ? Hell no ! no Victom , no crime ! want to llearn this I have Dvds for sale to teach you I can be reached @ geminieast77@yahoo.com

geminieast11 Says:

Jan 6, 2012 - @SPQR62 it is not too late ! you can File motions to surpress or Ficticious plantiff Is your Named Spelled in capitals L@@K @ your paper work ! I already know the Answer , and guess what it is not you ! Buy a few Dvds and Learn made easy I can be reached @ geminieast77@yahoo.com for Entertainment purposes only !

Gmoneyluv4u Says:

Feb 3, 2012 - THis is very interesting info the color of law is inextricable there is really no way out on no end because it is oxy moronic from it's very inception innocent until proven guilty all color of law is under a latin word called assumpsit (may be misspelled) everything is assumed under the color of law without being proven first a direct contradiction from the very beginning!

grimview Says:

Feb 9, 2012 - I have been advised not to comment.

HerosComment Says:

May 21, 2012 - Say when pulled over for expected driving drunk, why would anyone ever do all the cops tricks to convict you of a DUI, should we refuse to talk and refuse all test, we should not be compelled to build the prosecutions case against us but in some states it mandatory and if you refuse they hold you down and take blood, or you lose your drivers license for automatic 6 months for refusing, how can you be punished for not providing the state with help to convict you in a crime? I would like hear mor

HerosComment Says:

May 21, 2012 - on this subject.