Thermite (Mirrored)

AGreenEyedDevil Says:

Jun 3, 2010 - "Thirmite has never been used in a controlled demolition," because there is no such thing as thirmite. THERMITE however, does exist. Try proof reading before posting a video or no one is going to take you seriously even if you are right.

aes53 Says:

Jun 8, 2010 - Thermite containing nano scale materials is are called metastable interstitial composites in the scientific literature pertaining to it. It has been studied for some years now by the military and prototype ordinance have been produced. It is NOT at part of the arsenal and, as such, is not manufactured on a scale that would produced enough materials to bring down the world trade center. If you actually read this paper it is clear that it may or may not have been generated on 9/11.

trombondo Says:

Jun 12, 2010 - 5:38 - the word is "Modalities" (moh-da-li-ties), not "Modelites".Not that it matters really, the point was well taken - the sample makes no sense. Interesting video.

vadimcream Says:

Jun 14, 2010 - Massive blobs of thermite found in the debris? This is heresay at best. You are talking about many things as though they are documented fact when they are far from being so.

citizen762 Says:

Jun 14, 2010 - Don't misquote people. I said massive blobs of molten steel; not thermite. Seeing fountains of flowing molten metal pour out the side of burning building is not heresay. You can watch the f--cking video of it yourself if you take a moment to do your own research. There are also pictures of a crane lifting a frozen blob of molten steel that is still glowing red hot. Find pics of both of these yourself in <30sec on google images. Along with the other anomalies.

vadimcream Says:

Jun 14, 2010 - I believe I've heard explanations for these random things you're citing but regardless yr nitpicking when it comes to your complaint that he should have dealt with these topics. The fact is this was a specialized video on one topic in particular, there will always be other little anomalies that are worthy of being discussed perhaps in other vids. If you'd like explanations of these things you cited I believe debunking911dotcom does so in their "molten steel explained" section.

VCat2006 Says:

Jun 21, 2010 - So the thermite paper is fake because it's from a site with fake stuff? *saves 4 minutes*I wish people would focus more on the banned pilot guns and stricter intercept rules shortly before 9/11 when the "Bin Laden Determined To Strike" and "...With Airplanes" security briefings were making the rounds in the White House.

mYOzZyKaT Says:

Jul 5, 2010 - The account of Niels Harrit that appears in the RT clip at 10:45 is a complete lie on his behalf. He states that they should not speculate on how the claimed thermite was used. But that is in total contrast to Niels Harrits own opinion and statements were he argues that building seven, towers 1 and 2 of the WTC were brought down by a controlled demolition using thermite. He is clearly lying . He has a ongoing lecture show in Denmark were he concludes just that.

mYOzZyKaT Says:

Jul 5, 2010 - You actually do not know what kind of metal came out of the tower before it came down. There is very good evidence that it is melted aluminum which came out. That would be clearly in line with parts of the plane melting in the fire. And the blob you are referring to as steel is not steel, it is in fact aluminum and its wasnt red hot.

OMGSEASALT Says:

Jul 25, 2010 - Oh god no one spelling error means he's not going to taken seriously?

simonwedege Says:

Aug 20, 2010 - Thermite is not used for demolition because it's unreliable and unpredictable. Ignition requires extremely high temperatures which cannot be reached with conventional black powder fuses, nitrocellulose rods, detonators, pyrotechnic initiators, or other common igniting substances. Preheated thermite is even more unpredictable, and can burn almost instantaneously.

TTDMFfreaknew Says:

Sep 28, 2010 - I don't know why some people fail to understand the fact that crashing huge airplanes into buildings makes them fall down...its 1+1=2...

simonwedege Says:

Sep 29, 2010 - "so if thermite had been used - shouldn't we have found the byproducts of it - as opposed to the materials to make it?"I think that's a very good point. Also considering the high temperatures and friction surrounding the crash of the airplanes and the collapse of the towers.And as you have had experiments with thermite before, you would know how unpredictable it is. Besides, how would one get it to burn sideways into the steel frame of WTC?

SexyMelon Says:

Nov 17, 2010 - Viewers should note the video above is dishonest in comitting Guilt by Association, but also outright lying by omission about Betham Publishing.The nonsense paper discussed here was submitted to Open Information Science Journal of Betham Publishing by Davis, who had also previously submitted another such bogus paper to another Betham journal, and had it rejected by peer review. Neither of the above are Open Chemistry Journal where nano-thermite paper was published.

vengencefrom1979 Says:

Nov 22, 2010 - wanna see a home made thermite device in action cutting thru steel? go to watch?v=xYW-z7nrTZk

mYOzZyKaT Says:

Dec 3, 2010 - @tuzmor What you are claiming actually defies the laws of physics. Apparently some kid in Romania have just disproved Newtons laws of motion... Excellent..

Christopholaes Says:

Dec 17, 2010 - HHmm, didn't dprjones just say that it has been posited thermite be used in a thermate form, though no one in day to day practice does? But wouldn't that be an excellent way to hide what your doing? Don't get me wrong i think most of the theories about 9/11 are completely nuts! Yet, it seems obvious to me something fishy is going on there I have personally watched large buildings be demolished, buildings that have collapsed (as a building site labourer), and i can see y so many are suspicious!

SvenTviking Says:

Feb 18, 2011 - They had this sexy buzz word, Thermite! That turned to Thermate, then nanothermite and then nanothermate. They don't know how it was used, or why. But it was there because "loose change" said it was there. They should have gone for pixie dust.

marquedesade Says:

Mar 15, 2011 - Utter trash, let me translate the entire video in one sentence."I will not try to disprove the paper in question because it was not published in a journal of my choosing!" Utter hogwash, complete cop out. By this ridiculous line of reasoning a small family run construction company that builds on 1-3 homes a year has no credibility in the home construction market. As long as the guidelines are followed then it does not matter if its 1 of 1000 the end product is just as sound.

BrainsterPC Says:

May 6, 2011 - Great job. One of the peer-reviewers has identified himself. He is David L. Griscom. Griscom is a "Truther" himself; here's a You Tube video of Jones bragging about Griscom joining the movement in 2007 (before the peer review): v=q6psgCNFm6g Griscom has the most offensive theory in 9-11 "Truth" yet; he believes all the passengers on the four planes were volunteers who were paid off by the gov't.

punxsutawneybarney Says:

Jun 12, 2011 - For use of thermite in cutting steel, see my video "Incendiary Experiments".The mythbusters guys set off 1000 pounds of thermite to try to cut a car in half, and explosives experts at New Mexico Tech try to cut a column and a beam, and a Florida Engineer, Jonathan Cole, cuts columns, beams, bolt heads, and bolts.

db10001110101 Says:

Jul 3, 2011 - "As long as the guidelines are followed then it does not matter if its 1 of 1000 the end product is just as sound", but tey were not very sound at all. Sorry but you must not understand ow science works. Publising a paper alone doesnt demonstrate anyting. Teir job isnt finished but morons like you want to act like you have some "truth". Sorry kid.

db10001110101 Says:

Jul 3, 2011 - @tuzmor Yea watch all you biased propagand films and its no wonder you come to such crazy conclusions.

Mitche23 Says:

Sep 19, 2011 - Where are the referenced links he mentioned in the videos. You didn't copy them into the description.

monkofdeaths Says:

Mar 25, 2012 - ''the journal is nothing short of a joke'' so is the official investigation as the laws of physics disprove it... -_-