If you like the video, share it with your friends on these social sites:

 

Title: Official 2001: A Space Odyssey Trailer

Added: Feb 6, 2008

Author: rethwix

Duration: 3:36

Description:
Copyright 2003 Warner Bros.From Stanley Kubrick, the greatest director of all time.

Related Videos:

Videos related to 'Official 2001: A Space Odyssey Trailer'

Channel: Film

Tags: 2001:  space  odyssey  stanley  kubrick  warner  bros  brothers 



2001:  space  odyssey  stanley  kubrick  warner  bros  brothers 

Youtube Comments: 1636

jgtdaw Says:

May 3, 2012 - It about preventing our own existence from ending.I amazed so many didn't see that maybe.¢=

TRMDYLE666 Says:

May 4, 2012 - Kubrick was a genius. Hands down.

snillocgrom Says:

May 5, 2012 - Michael Bay isn't that bad. He makes entertaining movies. If I have to be cerebral and only watch crown jewels all the time I'd be taking myself too seriously.

malows1234 Says:

May 6, 2012 - here is the thing, if you wanna watch pure entertainment cinema sometimes, thats fine i get it, there are a lot of filmmakers in bay's 'group' who make entertainment films and not crown jewels or artistic masterpieces like kubrick. take for example nolan, he is pretty much a improved version of bay. why watch bay when you could watch nolan or even cameron, who do the same thing as bay, just a little better. thats why i don't get why people watch bay films.

snillocgrom Says:

May 6, 2012 - Because Bay films are action scifi trillers plus some college humor comedy. The other ones aren't so much. that and I loved transformers as a kid and had all the toys. People are allowed some nostalgia of childhood, right?

malows1234 Says:

May 6, 2012 - sure people are allowed to have nostalgia as long as it doesn't end up supporting little shits like michael bay. if spaceships were your toys and you love kubrick for making 2001, GREAT. if you support bay, wellll fuk it just pisses me off that someone as shitty as him is successful, thats all.

snillocgrom Says:

May 7, 2012 - I'm not a supporter of Bay. he's only a director. But his movies don't lack in entertainment value. He has his place. want truly shitty? try Paul w. Anderson or Uwe Boll, or Tom Six.

WhisperBrony Says:

May 9, 2012 - Though they would have a better chance you only included the first 3.

EpicTard1 Says:

May 10, 2012 - Well obviously... Star Wars is just your everyday high budget action movie franchise. Just a money making machine. 2001: A space odyssey is one of the greatest films ever made, directed by one of the greatest directors who ever lived. It's not just a film, it's a true piece of art. They're not even comparable.

ccaian1 Says:

May 11, 2012 - I first hated this film cause I went in expecting an action/ thriller. I thought it had bad musical cues and that it took to long to show a sequence.

sunnycoast4558 Says:

May 11, 2012 - this movie looks so shit

VerticalWit Says:

May 11, 2012 - dafuq did i just watch?

fortisKID Says:

May 11, 2012 - Why are people discussing Michael Bay? His movies suck ass...

alkabash66 Says:

May 12, 2012 - Looks like a crap movie

TheViestaFox Says:

May 12, 2012 - oh so that's where that's from hahaha.

J88Wolf Says:

May 12, 2012 - I can't really describe in detail why I enjoyed this movie, all I can say is that...It was "entertainingly boring" :P

AQWorldStark Says:

May 15, 2012 - Strange how people thought 2000 as the future.

billyfao Says:

May 16, 2012 - this is a great movie, the director its incredible, and actualy the moon does has a monolith there things of moon NASA never wanted to talk about

johnsmith908 Says:

May 17, 2012 - how on earth is that strange?

AQWorldStark Says:

May 18, 2012 - Think about. Nothing happened during 2000. The MiIennium bug never came, we never ventured to the moon, and no fIiying car's. When was this made anyway?

johnsmith908 Says:

May 18, 2012 - sometime during the 1960s i believe. my point is that 2000 was obviously the future when this was made, so its not strange. you can't blame them for not being 100% accurate. moreover, the film isn't meant to be scientifically accurate, it's a film based on symbolism etc., it shouldnt be taken at face value, i dont know if youve seen it but i would strongly recommend watching it if you havent!

AQWorldStark Says:

May 18, 2012 - You have a point. I would have thought that it'd be a bit more recent then 1960. But I guess we believe that there'll be much more advanced technology in 2040.

beans301 Says:

May 18, 2012 - the reason why some folks dont understand this movie is bc they are too young to understand the period of time this movie was filmed. back then there were dreamers who wanted to go to the moon and further. life progressed and nobody now understands bc gov't doesnt look past looking back inward here at us instead of outward.

boxd1n Says:

May 19, 2012 - I'm still waiting for a flying car by 2015.

Shopping | prank calls | Wholesale products | english movies | prank calls | proxy | links | prank call

Topfacebookvideos funny arabic videos

Privacy Policy