9/11 - The Toronto Hearings - 09/10/11 - Niels Harrit - 03:47PM.flv

Jimbofx911 Says:

Jan 31, 2012 - There is a bit of information overload with a all the observation made and uploaded with comments concerning 911 WTC. I was wondering if any of the A&E or Mr Chandler has seen an observation made by a youtuber named MrKoenig1985. In a video of the beginning of the south tower " collapse " He observed what may be core columns, 3 of them still attached by the horizontal braces being ejected from the South Tower? Would be nice to hear expert opinion on this.BTW great hearings in Toronto.

Jimbofx911 Says:

Jan 31, 2012 - This is the video:watch?v=0fbk3SoKdIE

blackArt2000 Says:

Mar 3, 2012 - Get These Videos out! Send to Everyone!

PoetryZound Says:

Mar 21, 2012 - Harrit et al have refused to share their dust samples with other researchers or send them to any independent testing labs. They have refused to do this, imho, because they know when the sunlight of repeatability and corroboration is shone on their study, they will fail. A new independent analysis of WTC dust by James Millette has found no presence of thermitic materials. Instead, the red-gray chips bear a striking resemblance to a type of primer paint.forums*randi*org/showthread*php?t=231314

lijebaley01 Says:

Mar 25, 2012 - Are you freakin serious? This MORON harrit still thinks a 5.87 p-value indicates a percent of iron spheres in the dust? Isn't there any truther that knows anything about statistics that can enlighten this idiot? After all, he is basing his whole theory on this number and is making a complete fool of himself. How the hell can a scientist not know of simple statistics? Organic chemistry is entirely based on probability and statistics.

mooners40 Says:

Mar 26, 2012 - iron spheres are a by product of thermitic reactions - the spheres are formed due to surface tension - perhaps you think bin laden put them there? Maybe heat was generated by muslim hate? Maybe bin laden made the top floors indestructible even though they were made from the same materials as the lower floors - 

mooners40 Says:

Mar 26, 2012 - i bet bin laden passivated the chips - he gets everywhere

megakinderr Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - why can't those researchers or labs those who want to conduct independent experiments get other independent samples, other than the samples of dust available with Harriet and match the results and pls don't tell me the only dust samples available or left are with Harriet et al and no other sources or quantities are available...

PoetryZound Says:

Mar 28, 2012 - That's what Millette did. After Harrit et al refused to give him samples, he obtained other ones. Turns out the ones he obtained were collected scientifically and had a better record of custody than Harrit's.

hauleywood Says:

Mar 29, 2012 - 9/11 WAS A MOSSAD JOB!!!!

megakinderr Says:

Mar 31, 2012 - did Millette publish their results, let them present their results and compare them with the ones with Harriet et el, in an open debate like the ones Harriet did... and Harriet said these are preliminary results and it is open for verification and correction, he is not scared of them turning out to be false and is very open to the idea of correction and further investigation, your description of their actions is insulting and incorrect, kind of trying to discredit them...

megakinderr Says:

Mar 31, 2012 - and if you watch the complete video carefully you will see that Harriet has shown red grey chips is not a primer paint...

PoetryZound Says:

Apr 8, 2012 - "did Millette publish their results"It's coming out in a legitimate peer reviewed scientific journal."Harriet has shown red grey chips is not a primer paint."He only tested for one type of primer paint. Millette discusses this odd oversight in his paper.

gontsaru Says:

Apr 10, 2012 - You are mistaken! Other researches (e.g. Dr. Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan etc.) came to the same conclusions as he did.

PoetryZound Says:

Apr 12, 2012 - Actually, Harrit, Jones and Ryan were all on the same team. In fact, Ryan is the one who refused to provide any dust samples to Millette.

jessejohn77 Says:

Apr 16, 2012 - they removed all the evidence rather quickly

bulletproof2353 Says:

Apr 18, 2012 - id like to know how much mecury is in that dust ,can you imagine how many flourescent light tubes were in those buildings,and that got smashed and and had their mercury vapor released,never mind the asbestos

ziggyNY123 Says:

Apr 24, 2012 - BS. If you want to be treated seriously by any serious researcher, you would mention WHO was refused the samples, okay? WTC dust from various sources HAS been looked at by many independent researchers and verified each time. So, knowing this, your comment can only be seen as blatant disinfo!

PoetryZound Says:

Apr 24, 2012 - "you would mention WHO was refused the samples"If you had checked the link, you would have seen the answer: Kevin Ryan refused to share samples with Millette. Harrit et al haven't sent any samples to independent testing labs either. If you want to be taken seriously, you would mention WHO these "many" independent researchers are (not connected to Harrit et al such as Basile) who verify thermitic materials in the dust. How ironic that it turns out that YOU'RE the one engaging in disinfo.

Skull4Scavenger Says:

May 2, 2012 - PoetryZound is a very strange individual. I checked his profile and besides of trying to plant disinformation here he has no activity on this channel whatsoever. Just empty. Just click on his name. I smell a rat....

Skull4Scavenger Says:

May 2, 2012 - Why not produce these results here on the tube? And not only in a "legitimate peer reviewed scientific journal." By the way, what is the name of this legitimate scientific journal? And plse, do not bother me with NG.......

newsmanbluesman Says:

May 7, 2012 - The IQ test is over - there's no English-speaking debunker who can speak a second language as well as truther Dr Harrit does.Clear language is the best sign of clear thought - and ours presents impediments aplenty.But he attains full credibility after 1:02 with the remark "I shouldn't have put in a new battery."The man is brilliant, and underlines Prof MacQueen's wise comment: its absurd that anyone on 9/11 would claim to know how the Towers had come down. Yet many glibly did so.

aczjbr Says:

May 21, 2012 - Carleton University,Dept.of Civil & Environmental Engineering,Ottawa,Canadian Society for Civil Engeneering(CSCE)Canadian Institute Of Steel Construction(CISC)Canadian Consulting Engineer(CCE),Institute for Research in Construction (IRC),National Research Council, Ottawa,(NRC)ERTA, Équipe de recherche sur le terrorisme at`antiterrorisme,OtawaGeological Survey of Canada,Natural Resources Canada,OttawaPublic Works & Government Services Canada,Gatineau,Quebec

aczjbr Says:

May 21, 2012 - Institutions of Canada reject the false science of the A&E and its lackeys against 7 millions of my fellow U.Sengineer.Yolles, Structural Engineers of Toronto.Queen's University,Dept.of Civil & Environmental Engineering,KingstonRyerson University,Dept.of Civil & Environmental Engineering,TorontoUniversity of Ottawa,Dept.of Civil & Environmental Engineering,University of Waterloo,Dept.of Civil & Environmental Engineering.OntarioUniversity of Calgary,Emergent Information Systems Laboratory