Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org

hgfbob Says:

Apr 10, 2012 - "no way you would miss the charges going off. Not even CLOSE!'no one did...LT PATRICK SCARINGELLO EMSWTC2"I heard the explosion from up above. I looked up, I saw smoke and flame and then I saw the top tower tilt, start to twist and lean".FR WILLIAM REYNOLDSWTC2- "I was distracted by a large explosion from the south tower and it seemed like fire was shooting out a couple of hundred feet in each direction, then all of a sudden the top of the tower started coming down."BOOM before fall

hgfbob Says:

Apr 10, 2012 - how is it that there are hundreds of FDNY reporting the same thing...BOOM, to get their attention, THEN, they see it collapse.you do understand there is a 2 second delay before the sound even reaches them, so if the EXPLOSION/sound is just the collapse as YOU claim, HOW can they see it BEFORE it makes the sound that gets their attention?so first-hand-man...what's your "experience" say about that?

roquefortfiles Says:

Apr 10, 2012 - Boom?.. !! You don't take down a building with a BOOM. I suggest you look up an interview with an FDNY member named Frank Papalia. He was standing right there. Never heard a thing. And nobody even spoke of that when it happened. Its only here on YT that this building has such a "Myth"It was entirely expected to collapse. Have you read any of the Fireman oral histories?. They ALL expected it to come downA team of CD techs were there when it did. They watched it.

hgfbob Says:

Apr 11, 2012 - 'Never heard a thing'so what...there are 118 that DID!!!so tell us about the ability to SEE it collapse AFTER they hear the "BOOM/EXPLOSION that gets their attention to look up for them to SEE IT START TO COLLAPSE?????how does SOUND travel FASTER than light, ONLY on 9-11???????

roquefortfiles Says:

Apr 11, 2012 - A team of CD techs were already at B 7 when it came down. They watched it. So unless you are attempting to say a team of professionals suddenly have no idea about their job while they look at it. Is nothing short of absurd. #2. Nobody found a single item relating to a CD. Not one.# 3. There are a half a dozen videos of B 7 coming down. When someone shows me ONE that sounds like this watch?v=obJe66QHx_Y&feature=related(and this is what it would sound like)THEN.. I will care.

roquefortfiles Says:

Apr 11, 2012 - Buildings are not brought down with a ... BOOM!!. Do you like to be informed?. I suggest you go and read the firemen oral histories of 911. B7 was evacuated because of the rescue efforts going on from WTC. It was simply allowed to burn. There isn't one fireman there who didn't think that building was eventually going to fail. Frank Papalia was there.watch?v=gbIr7Ln4fXYYou weren't. Time to move on!!!

roquefortfiles Says:

Apr 11, 2012 - BOOM, to get their attention, THEN, they see it collapse.How is that Ashley Banfield of CNN knew this structure was coming down. She is on air giving a live report saying. "We are told that that building tower 7 is the next building likely coming down".Why did she know this? Because EVERYONE dealing with 7 knew it. Or we could just say Ashley is a psychic.

roquefortfiles Says:

Apr 11, 2012 - I am kind of tired of hearing people use quotes of firemen hearing a "huge explosion" and then the tower came down. Like what else is 32 stories going to sound like when it finally reaches the failure point? Bolts and steel snapping and letting go?.. OF COURSE its going to make a heck of allot of sound. ABC NEWS are 800 feet from WTC 2. They shoot with a professional camera that has 2 sources of very high quality audio. They record absolutely nothing. Not one BANG.Kind of absurd

roquefortfiles Says:

Apr 11, 2012 - The Oklahoma city bombing had one of the largest single devices. Compared to a shaped charge for a CD it was 1000x more powerful. If not more. A HUGE blast over pressure. It registered almost nothing on seismographs. In fact a technician at a nearby seismology lab thought the tiny blip it generated was the result of a traffic accident. And the "TM" would have us believe every building on Sept 11th is crammed full of explosives? Good luck!!

roquefortfiles Says:

Apr 11, 2012 - What did they base this on since it has never happened????. In law we look for precedents to base cases on.Where is the precedent for ANY of what took place on Sept 11th? Two commercial airliners going thru two buildings. Thats happened.. WHEN?.How bout never!!A giant sky scraper collapsing and raining TONS of debris on to another building?Has happened WHEN??..How about never. Saying this has never happened before. The entire day has never happened before. There is no comparison

hgfbob Says:

Apr 12, 2012 - "The Oklahoma city bombing had one of the largest single devices"lets look at that...at least 50% structural damage at Oklahoma..NO COLLAPSE.14.5% in each tower on the impact floors with NOTHING structurally deficient below.total global unified consistent unwavering collapse.....x3

hgfbob Says:

Apr 12, 2012 - They shoot with a professional camera that has 2 sources of very high quality audio"WRONG...they SEPARATELY record audio....those "professional cameras" only do video.

roquefortfiles Says:

Apr 12, 2012 - I used to be a news shooter. I have shot with the very cameras ABC, CBS or NBC use. Yes they might have a sound guy rolling on major interviews. But not doing hit and run live stuff like a stand up at the WTC. No way!!And those cameras have excellent hi quality mics on them. To have one 800 feet from a "Supposed" CD and have it record nothing is nothing short of ridiculous. It CAN'T happen.I have done EXACTLY this at a 25 story CD implosion.Its nonsense.

hgfbob Says:

Apr 13, 2012 - 'And those cameras have excellent hi quality mics on them.'then tell me WHY they NEVER play the soundtrack when you see the collapse son Documentaries like Nat.Geo..The History Channel.........WHY do they play..MUSIC when the collapse occur.....or do a talk through???besides, YOU support an official claim from a SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION bestowed to NIST by Congress...show the EVIDENCE of "NO explosives or accelerants" as OFFICIALLY claimed.

roquefortfiles Says:

Apr 13, 2012 - then tell me WHY they NEVER play the soundtrack when you see the collapse son Documentaries like Nat.Geo..(I don't know what you are talking about. Or watching. I could link you to half a dozen hi quality video and audio of the collapse.)show the EVIDENCE of "NO explosives or accelerants" as OFFICIALLY claimed.(For one thing accelerants are not used to implode buildings. The "TM" doesnt' seem to get it. You haven't "FOUND" anything in Thermite this is not used to CD a building)

roquefortfiles Says:

Apr 13, 2012 - show the EVIDENCE of "NO explosives or accelerants" as OFFICIALLY claimed.Not one wire, blast cap, fuse element, piece of det chord, shock tube.. NOT ONE found or even seen at any of the buildings. And a team of CD techs were already at B7 when it came down. Explosives do not pulverize concrete floors in to powder. Its a lousy material to do thisThe crush force of the concrete was estimated to be about 1.5 gigajoules of energy. That means its POWDER. The collapse generated 3.5.

CoryAKAknoxville Says:

Apr 18, 2012 - theres so much foul play within the event of 9/11: multiple testimonies, evidence found in samples, israelis cheering at the destruction found and attained while in a van with the towers being hit painted on the very sides, molten steel found weeks and months after during clean up...it would take an absolute braindead individual to think it wasnt planned and intended.denial is a cancer and its eaten up over half the population within this country.but truth will come out, its inevitable.

CoryAKAknoxville Says:

Apr 18, 2012 - and @roquefortfiesif u honestly think these buildings can collapse to DUST youre the head sheep in the herd.by an "normal" collapse of gravity/force you would see big chunks of concrete after collapse.NOT dust, thats just ridiculous to even mention.even planes/jumbo jets that crash violently are found in chunks, were talking bout a highrise collapsing solely by gravity...youre not even rational.simple assessment is evidence enough.critical thinking is way over your head, pal.

CoryAKAknoxville Says:

Apr 18, 2012 - also....if you honestly think these buildings simply collapsed by force via pancaking, then answer me this: why is steel and debris hurdled hundreds of yards away from the buildings??? with force enough to absolutely embed into other structures?? watching any of the collapses u can see the banana peel effect of debris flying up and outward hundreds of yards away from the action of "collapsing"im sorry but your theory of simple collapse was debunked the day of 9/11.

CoryAKAknoxville Says:

Apr 18, 2012 - ae911truth is opening of the door.critical thinking is the solution"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds""If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin" direct quotes from one of our very own founding fathers during time of constitution -Samuel Adams

Nyumgoway Says:

Apr 29, 2012 - That's my cousin!

chillinator Says:

May 17, 2012 - Ah, yes, the traditional, moronic, Ad Hominem attack of the weak minded zombie. LameStream Media has trained you well - you attack the man because you can't refute the information. Your argument is as weak as your grammar. Just because someone is a "janitor" (or a Loader) does NOT preclude them from having intimate technical knowledge of how a process takes place. The fact that you have any "thumbs up" speaks to the fact that you must have a lot of *very* stupid friends.

taiddan Says:

May 17, 2012 - LMFAO! You should learn the definition of ad hominem before trying to use it. Ad hominem is an irrelevant attack that does nothing more than belittle someone in an attempt to invalidate their argument. Defining a person's position in a company is not ad hominem and is completely relevant to an argument in that it defines their qualifications. Now if I said, "Don't listen to this guy, he's a shit eating, whore jumper." then that is ad hominem.

taiddan Says:

May 17, 2012 - What's hilarious here is that you attempted to fault me for using ad hominem, when in fact it is you that are guilty of using it. You attempted to negate my relevant comment by saying it was moronic and I have stupid friends... LMFAO! Obviously you have been guilty of ad hominem several times in the past, and now you think this is your chance to call someone else out on it instead... fail. Get an education and then come back and post something relevant.

rikufanboy Says:

May 20, 2012 - What Israelis cheered? you are mistaking us for the Palestinians in Gaza who cheered.Get THAT fact right, at least, if not the others.No Israeli ever cheered when that happened, not even those who think the USA sucks ass.