Ron Paul- Romney/Obama NO CHANCE of Understanding This! Gold, Silver, Free Markets and Liberty

CntthnkO15 Says:

May 8, 2012 - I thought there was no audit, ever, before this one of the fed... The banks already work in a much worse manner... tax breaks for the rich? wtf? Explain, proof. Again, you still haven't proved that Bilderberg is financing him. Btw, Bilderberg never finances anyone, they get their bankers to do so. And if you believe in Bilderberg, you would know this whole voting nonsense is all false, so why bother with arguing about who to vote for, who not to vote, and fore who is fruad, etc.

Laughingblades Says:

May 8, 2012 - Partial audits are routine, full audits never happen and they never will, not unless congress or the supreme court decides they should.Ron Paul wants to cut taxes to 15%, that won't effect the poor who already pay around 15% already, but it will drastically cut taxes on the rich.Ron Paul's biggest backer is Peter Thiel, a rather high ranking and out Bilderberger, google it, research the man you worship.Ron Paul wants to give private banks their own mints, vs what the constitution says.

evassar92 Says:

May 8, 2012 - Don't worry guys, I've seen Laughingblades on other Ron Paul videos and he's just trolling. On one he called Paul a racist... Laughingblades is such a joke.

CntthnkO15 Says:

May 9, 2012 - 15%? Where did you get that number from? On his website, he says he wants to cut it to 0.I looked up the connection and I see no actual reason to believe that website (BuzzFeed). You have anything else more believable?Where did you get the information that he wants to give private banks their own mints?

Laughingblades Says:

May 9, 2012 - I guess he's changed his position since 2008 then, does he really want a 0 tax?Ahhhh I see, he's now promoting sales taxes and wants to get rid of all other taxes, that would just consolidate all taxes onto the price of groceries, that would devastate poor and working class Americas, good thing he'd have no power to do that if he got elected.Google Ron Paul Peter ThielGoogle "Political positions of Ron Paul" can't find the video of the speech where he mentions giving banks their own mints.

southeast40 Says:

May 16, 2012 - he's not pushing tax breaks. he's pushing for NO TAXATION! this country did fine without a dept. of education for decades. when it was developed, what happened? the quality of education went down, teacher's salaries went down, the government intervened and demanded that we keep up with the Jones' (China, Japan, etc.). besides, I bring up Bush and Obama because, once again, they answer to higher powers (special interests). Ron Paul is one of a few willing to stand up for your Liberties!

Laughingblades Says:

May 16, 2012 - Ron Paul's position on this is rather shifty, he can't seem to make up his mind.So tell me, does Ron Paul want 10% taxes, 0% taxes, or Sales Taxes of an indeterminate amount? All of the above depending on when you listen to him.The quality of education went down with the adoption of the Prussian Model and Scientific Management, not with the nationalization of education, and unlike before when only the wealthy could afford to learn to read and the church ruled education, now everyone can read

Laughingblades Says:

May 16, 2012 - "they answer to higher powers"Like the Bilderberg Steering Committee, got it.Ron Paul isn't standing up for our liberty, he's using words you like to hear and telling you what you already know and using that to sell you the opposite of liberty.

BlakeFalling Says:

May 17, 2012 - What happens when RP abolishes the fed and makes the currency backed by gold. How will this translate in how we will pay back our dept to the other nations, give them a shitload of gold??? Woudlnt that cause a disaster?

Eye2EyeIIIV Says:

May 18, 2012 - wish he won in 2008...

Eye2EyeIIIV Says:

May 18, 2012 - (1 Timothy 6:10)"For the love of money is the root of all evil..."

acepl78 Says:

May 18, 2012 - Nothing will happen with FED abolished, except lots of good. However, he never said there is need to return to gold immediately. This will, of course, cause disaster. First step is to allow gold and silver BACK into money circulation and let people decide which is better.

BlakeFalling Says:

May 18, 2012 - proof sources, your arguements are meaningless unless you provide them.

BlakeFalling Says:

May 18, 2012 - As a Business Major, I know the Fed was first created to manage businesses from becomming too powerful, and preventing crashes. What will prevent these problems if the feds abolished?

Laughingblades Says:

May 18, 2012 - Proof that Ron Paul sponsored DOMA before voting against it? Google "Ron Paul DOMA" He's got quite a history with that Act.As for the fact that he personally stuffed the earmarks in, you can see him personally admit to it after much squirming on Meet the Press /watch?v=GyPLFKUdhqY

Boydist1 Says:

May 18, 2012 - Considering we are still in the middle of an ongoing crash & that the banks have become too big and powerful (insisting on bailouts) all whilst under the 'expert' guidance of the Fed, the answer is reinstating the regulations that stated banks who are federally insured cannot indulge in super risky practices such as credit default swaps and the like. Just a simple bit of legislation is all that is required -- which we already had in place but the last of which was dismantled by Bill Clinton.

BlakeFalling Says:

May 18, 2012 - What about Substidised College loans? You think college costs will go down without them? What is it doesnt, making college affordable only for the wealthy...

acepl78 Says:

May 18, 2012 - Right now FED IS A business - privately owned - which allows banks to grow uncontrollably (by bailout policy), and due to its monetary policies CREATES crashes.Listen, I know you think that when your FF wrote constitution, they put in it rule that gold=money because they knew nothing else. That's wrong - read about John Law and his Banque Royale. FF knew the paper money then and knew the consequences of allowing government to take over money creation (not coining).Paper money=bubble=CRASH.

Boydist1 Says:

May 18, 2012 - Sorry not sure what you're talking about. Are you saying the Fed subsidizes college loans?

BlakeFalling Says:

May 19, 2012 - I go to a college right now, I am from a poor family so I take out federal lones that have a low interest rate, a rate that you cant get from any bank. If Ron Paul got rid of the fed, how would I get my affordable lones?

Boydist1 Says:

May 19, 2012 - I think you might have your wires crossed a little. Yes you might have a federal loan, meaning you've borrowed money from the government, but that does not mean you have borrowed it directly from the Federal Reserve. Which as far as I can determine, doesn't administer or provide college loans. It is after all essentially a private institution with the word 'Federal' in its title being a misnomer.

Gshock545 Says:

May 20, 2012 - jefferson got rid of itthen there came another national bankand jackson got rid of itthen there came a third national bankand Paul got rid of it

lakersjohnson3 Says:

May 21, 2012 - the reason college is so expensive is because of all the federally guaranteed student loans and all the federal credit. if there were no federal student loan programs, then no one would be able to get a student loan, and the colleges would be forced to lower their tuitions, and everyone who wanted to go to college would then be able to afford it without going into hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of debt.

spiritartman Says:

May 24, 2012 - Through Private  Grants not Gov Grants

Malteseifyme Says:

May 27, 2012 - I love Ron Paul. It's a shame that some people aren't smart enough to realize that Romney and Obama are the same politically. He actually cares about every group of people age wise, which to me says a lot about his policy he would implement.