The Subtle Art of Self-Delusion

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - SYNTHETIC DNA NOT CAPABLE OF MACRO-EVOLUTION, only micro-evolution. The genetic code scientists created by intelligent design in the lab is capable of undergoing only micro-evolution (which involves variations of existing genes), and this can produce varieties within a natural species. It is not, however, capable of macro-evolution. That would require entirely new genes, which mindless Nature isn't capable of inventing. Read my Internet article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - NYLON-EATING BACTERIA is not evidence of mutations producing new genetic information. The genes were degraded by mutations and that's how the capability came about. "It is like damaging the interior of a lock so that more and different keys can now unlock it." Read The Internet article NYLON-EATING BACTERIA AND EVOLUTIONARY PROGRESS by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas.

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - RANDOM GENETIC MUTATIONS caused by the mindless environment are destructive. Even if mutations are not immediately harmful, after enough of them accumulate they will be harmful. And, even if a good mutation does occur, for every good mutation there will be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, being harmful to the species as a whole and even causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most biological variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there's information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That's evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from sea sponge to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibria, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn't be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in open systems, there must first exist energy-converting/directing mechanisms to develop order, such as DNA directing a seed to become a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE couldn't sustain itself eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME? When you divide a cake, the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - NO REAL EVIDENCE FOR DINOSAUR TO BIRD EVOLUTION: Just google the title to access this article. Also, go to the Internet site ANSWERS IN GENESIS to find out about how true science supports the Bible. Find out answers to questions about dinosaurs and the Bible, the age of the earth, the fossil record, etc. Just type into the "search" box on the site your question or topic of interest to find relevant articles.

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - BIG HOLES IN BANG THEORY, THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM, GOD DIDN'T NEED A BEGINNING. Just google the titles to access these articles.

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that an airplane or cell originated by undirected natural laws. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Mogley52 Says:

May 4, 2012 - ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)

ergonomover Says:

May 4, 2012 - Comment-bomber mogley52 continues to spam great videos like this one with his out-dated, pseudo-scientific drivel. He refuses to respond to any challenges or rebuttals. To be ignored

IKillBabyKittensLOL Says:

May 5, 2012 - Shut up. No one one cares.

movcrit Says:

May 10, 2012 - If I find the cure for all blindness and use it to cure all blind people, that is also by definition genocide.

AngelaJKerns Says:

May 15, 2012 - Science does not have a conclusive answer as to how the universe began, but not having an answer now does not mean you can take the massive leap to 'it must have been some supernatural being' and then stop trying to answer the question.If we stopped every time we could give the 'oh, it must have been God' answer, then we would not be as advanced as we are now.God is the 'I'm too lazy to look any further' answer.

GhillieMan482 Says:

May 20, 2012 - I wish you were my teacher :/

dexterr482 Says:

May 24, 2012 - So, according to tf00t's critics, removal of mass retardation = genocide?Socrates was far worse than Hitler it seems.

ludditeneaderthal Says:

May 25, 2012 - islam is currently caught up in a pattern repeated by each of the abrahamic religions in turn. it's the "nature of the beast", basically. judaism had their slaughter and genocide of the canaanites, christianity their absorbtion into the final days of the roman empire, and islam their period of conquest. all descended into a "dark period" following their peak of influence. when one worships a homicidal deity, whose lore is rife with vindicative destruction, one tends to emulate 'his" actions.

jessxxy Says:

May 26, 2012 - I really enjoy your video's ;}

kotoroshinoto Says:

May 26, 2012 - convert or die is THEIR bag, they just assume everybody is like them

TheSanwiches Says:

May 29, 2012 - Science is good at creating vaccines. Maybe this time, science IS the vaccine.