WCG - Qualifier 5 - Huk vs giX - Game 3 - PvZ - StarCraft 2

GoblinKnightLeo Says:

Jan 20, 2012 - Wait, what? At what time and where and in which culture were there no sexual distinctions? And, be specific please. Cite at least one verifiable source. And one more thing: claims regarding tribal groups who kept no written records of their own are prohibited.As for it being unnatural, the evolutionary purpose of sexual intercourse is of course reproduction. Given that homosexual intercourse cannot result in reproduction, what natural function does it serve?

GoblinKnightLeo Says:

Jan 20, 2012 - Because to be perfectly frank, I don't believe that homosexuality is NEVER a choice. Gay men who seek out effeminate men, and lesbians who seek out butch women, are clearly seeking a partner with characteristics of the opposite sex. It's more accurate to say that the first is seeking a woman with a penis, and the second is seeking a man without one.Granted, the reverse demonstrates conclusively that its not a choice for some (for example, gay men seeking masculine partners).

GoblinKnightLeo Says:

Jan 20, 2012 - Given the preceding, and the fact that social institutions have always been centered around the progress and growth of humanity (and gays cannot actually participate in this, because they cannot have children together), the widespread dislike and distrust is natural. Frankly, they don't have as much invested in the species as we heteros do.The behavior of the gay community has, also quite frankly, not helped matters.

Zeuts85 Says:

Jan 20, 2012 - Sexual distinctions did not exist before the evolution of sex. As a reference, I'd reccomend BBC's special titled: "First Life" with David Attenborough. Anyway, I point this fact out merely to forestall any mention of an objective order that deems homosexuality "wrong," as so many Christians and other groups seem inclined to do.

Zeuts85 Says:

Jan 20, 2012 - I agree, that homosexuality probably is a choice in some circumstances, but is it fair to criticize an entire group for the behavior of a few? I've read that at least 2% of the population is gay (probably more). Thus, it seems to me that there are more individuals who do not make a habit of advertising their homosexuality versus those who do. Take individuals like Alan Turing for example. His sexual orientation harmed no-one, yet he was persecuted for it.

GoblinKnightLeo Says:

Jan 21, 2012 - Fine, but the evolution of sex occurred long before the evolution of humanity. Long before the evolution of dinosaurs, for that matter. That means that the fact that there was a time before sex is absolutely irrelevant to any human social or ethical concern.And it is also agreed that criticizing a group for the behavior of a few is unfair. The problem is that left-leaning groups like gays, and blacks, tend to act with groupthink, due in no small part to their leadership.

GoblinKnightLeo Says:

Jan 21, 2012 - So even if only a few are engaging in the deplorable behavior, their fellows excuse or even defend that behavior, and that makes them accomplices. Its the reason that it is also perfectly reasonable to be suspicious of Muslims, given the utter lack of Muslim "moderates" who denounce their terrorist brethren. Occasionally we hear of Muslims who claim that Osama bin Laden et al are violating the edicts of the Koran, but they are a tiny minority of Muslims.

GoblinKnightLeo Says:

Jan 21, 2012 - i.e. OJ Simpson, and of course Barack Obama (Yes, I do not hesitate to group them together following the scandal with F&F). Solidarity of this kind means that the best of a group become the moral equals of the worst of the group.This is also reflected in homosexuals. For example, it is a class 3 felony to donate blood if you know that you have HIV. Why is it not a capital crime? I mean, if it gets through the screening process somehow, you've just murdered someone.

0delius Says:

Feb 9, 2012 - hey man you like sucking dick?

umadbrow Says:

Feb 9, 2012 - Nope cause I get a ton of pussy. Its you nerd fucks who like sucking gayhuskys dick

0delius Says:

Feb 9, 2012 - wow thanks for your essay of a response, oh I'm so cool aren't I? ya, people think I'm cool now right? no? no one? exactly what I thought... please stop

umadbrow Says:

Feb 10, 2012 - .... the fuck are you blabbering about? Did I insult your gay love husky so much you went full retard?

0delius Says:

Feb 10, 2012 - Everybody knows you're just insulting people so you can get a rise out of other people. it's called being a troll, and people don't like it. I understand you just got a computer for the first time, so I'll let it slide THIS time.

Linus135 Says:

Feb 10, 2012 - That awkward moment when you realize the top comments suck *sigh*

teball31 Says:

Feb 12, 2012 - i am goind to flag all the argument as spam muhahaha

billnye69 Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - Jinx.....I mean syke, not jinx. XD Dunno why that made me laugh.

TheMuffinRapist Says:

Feb 20, 2012 - FAAAAAAAAAAAAGG

eddsson Says:

Feb 20, 2012 - Wet Noodle vs Brick Wall. Now that's a matchup.

AvengerJory Says:

Feb 20, 2012 - HAHAHAHAHAHA JUST CAME TO A HUSKY VIDEO AND LOOK AT THE COMMENTS HAHAH! YOU KIDS ARE NUTS! ARE YOU SERIOUSLY ARGUING ABOUT WHO'S THE GAYEST? THIS IS STARCRAFT. THIS IS HUSKYSTARCRAFT. HE'S NOT GAY HE ROLLS AROUND IN TITS AFTER WORK EACH DAY SO WHY ARE THE COMMENTS UNDER THE VIDEO THAT ARE MEANT TO BE ABOUT THE VIDEO- FULL OF HOMOSEXUAL REMARKS! YOU KIDS MADE ME LOL

Supaifails Says:

Feb 20, 2012 - Your such a fucking idiot.

eleventy2skadoo Says:

Mar 2, 2012 - Husky your zvp and zvt playlists are in reverse order, plays games 5,4,3,2,1 instead of 1,2,3,etc. Please fix!

varletdeath Says:

Mar 9, 2012 - Where are the banelings

ThePsychoticOtter Says:

Mar 18, 2012 - That was such a win comment that i want to give you some small amount of applause.

Zeuts85 Says:

Mar 18, 2012 - Why thankyou sir.

MrTwistly Says:

Mar 31, 2012 - THE HUK NORRIS PROBE