All Creative Work Is Derivative

kleverkloggs Says:

Jan 27, 2012 - think all this proves is that there are only so many ways the human body is articulated, only so many positions the human body can sit stand and place the arms legs hands etc . . . . . . .

alcarne Says:

Jan 30, 2012 - Muito bom

ilconte55 Says:

Jan 31, 2012 - Restrizioni? E perchè? Questo lavoro dovrebbe essere mostrato a tutti!

TisLiberte Says:

Jan 31, 2012 - Gesture.

BigDogJang0 Says:

Jan 31, 2012 - This video was age restricted because of some naked statues? Give me a break.

warcrock123 Says:

Feb 1, 2012 - as mina pira nessa dancinha de estatuas

edilsoncr1 Says:

Feb 1, 2012 - This video is not an argument attempting to prove the phrase with which it concludes, it's just an artistical depiction of the idea made to raise concern around that issue. If you look for the theory behind it, you'll see that it goes much beyond similarities of statues along history.

edilsoncr1 Says:

Feb 1, 2012 - This video is not an argument attempting to prove the phrase with which it concludes, it's just an artistical depiction of the idea made to raise concern around that issue. If you look for the theory behind it, you'll see that it goes much beyond similarities of statues along history.

vegnagunL Says:

Feb 2, 2012 - Todo o conhecimento é "serial", it was always based in what came before, o mito começa na individualidade. We are all connected.

ladyattis Says:

Feb 5, 2012 - Especially convergent evolution.

rks581 Says:

Feb 9, 2012 - Powerful, remarkable in its simplicity. Starting from the simplest representations of the human form, this shows how art has evolved as a series of divergent, but derivative works, over time.And then it stops. It cannot be suggested that gargoyles or winged heroes inspired anthropomorphic cartoons, or Greek athletes inspired superheroes. Instead of continuing to the present, the creator hits the wall of copyright law and must return to the beginning.

LieutenantStandby Says:

Feb 13, 2012 - The same principle applies to movies, tv shows, video games, all media and creative arts. There needs to be a Steam-like business model for all of this creative media, so we can support our artists more directly. How can the studios under Hollywood withhold such an immense wealth of culture subject to extortionate prices?

kirbykrew Says:

Feb 20, 2012 - "This video is age restricted based on our community guidelines"Disgraceful. The statues in this work are marvelous pieces of art that are meant to be beheld, and have strong meaning. It shouldn't be restricted because a penis and breasts are slightly depicted. Does this also mean that we have to be 18+ to look at the statue of David, who symbolizes individual freedom and the defeat of tyrants, solely because he is depicted nude?

LimpeComAlface Says:

Feb 24, 2012 - 47 people , dont have creative mind!

DracoAzule Says:

Mar 1, 2012 - Same goes for video games. All games require an SDK. Software development kit.  So each game made is simply built using the pre existing material the programmers already have. Therefore it is a derivative works.

zarathustra2k1 Says:

Mar 1, 2012 - Lovely...

bunchof6 Says:

Mar 10, 2012 - THIS IS INFRINGING ON THE RIGHTS OF ALL THOSE ANCIENT SCULPTORS I DAMAND THAT IT IS TAKEN DOWN

HNIW Says:

Mar 13, 2012 - Awesome!

rorshachfan Says:

Mar 14, 2012 - 0:49 was that crucified Jesus dancing?

KLMC Says:

Mar 31, 2012 - i dont get this?explanation pls

KLMC Says:

Mar 31, 2012 - i can watch this again and again i dont get the point...

Alelip1000 Says:

Apr 2, 2012 - Beautiful video.For people who studied history of art, it's a gem.

The80sKickAss Says:

May 2, 2012 - I understand the point of the video, I don't entirely agree with it, tho. I can agree that most work is derivative but once in a while something comes along that stands out from everything that came before it as an original work.

MrHello9128 Says:

May 6, 2012 - 0:50The one in the middle looks like he is having an electric shock XD

mphello Says:

May 10, 2012 - I took this video, removed one pixel from it, and now claim that I was inspired by the original.Ok - that was a bit of a strawman. Today's major problem is not going to such ridiculous extremes of blatantly copying but then claiming it's not, but creating something Y that is so obviously different from X but the creator of X claiming Y is equal to X.