Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 - AE911Truth.org

zenderson Says:

May 23, 2012 - he profited billions on a 15 million investment. he said they made the decision to pull it. he specifically got terrorism insurance months before it all happened then made two claims for two planes. How curious that on the day of the attack, Guiliani and his entourage set up shop in a different headquarters, abandoning his special bunker designed precisely for such an event.

nathenism Says:

May 23, 2012 - open your eyes and your mind and look at the evidence. its overwhelming. theres no way fire could make an entire steel framed structure fall apart all at the same time. you can plant seeds of doubt here and there, which is all deniers do. if it takes thousands of explosives to make a building fall like that how could it possibly do it without them?

jimmym1a1 Says:

May 23, 2012 - you need to open your mind and take a RATIONAL view, IF you're talking about #7, it's my opinion the damage it encoured, the way it was constructed with that canterlouver over the electric sub station along with burning all day long were the contributing factors that caused the collapse....listen; just because something "looks" a certain way, don't take it at face value

spirithawk69 Says:

May 23, 2012 - Once people are exposed to the truth, their decision to ridicule it manifests so quickly, one could mistakenly think that human beings are actually robots that were programmed to do so. Thus, if people really want to point the finger at someone who does not engage in serious critical thinking, they should go to the nearest mirror and point at themselves (rather than trying to point the finger at the truth messenger).

spirithawk69 Says:

May 23, 2012 - It is truly amazing how people are able to adopt one of Earth's belief systems (whether it be a specific religion or atheism), walk through the proverbial door of enlightenment (or so they think), shut the door behind them, and then never look back. Worse yet, they are actually proud not to look back--proud of their own ignorance

spirithawk69 Says:

May 23, 2012 - People are actually foolish enough to think that their conventional worldviews are the height of rationality They neglect to factor the concept of intentional deception into their logical thought processes&thus they fail to realize that the only reason why their worldviews seem so rational is because their worldviews are composed of a plethora of lies and distortions. So,people think the lies that they are spoon fed are reality&that the truth on the other hand is unrealistic

spirithawk69 Says:

May 23, 2012 - Furthermore, when people come upon new information such as this, they erroneously assume that they have some sort of intellectual high ground over it. They start with the assumption that their belief system is correct, and, for whatever reason, vehemently refuse to acknowledge the possibility that they may have actually been deceived all along by their belief system.so when confronted with counter-evidence they automatically reject it.

spirithawk69 Says:

May 23, 2012 - People like to blow off the truth by claiming that it is simply nonsense calling it funny entertaining ect.In addition they automatically disregard the truth messenger as being a standard-issue schizophrenic who is obviously out of touch with reality.People desperately try to paint truth messengers as being non-lucid mentally unstable illogical &so self-absorbed that they cant see things for what they really are this is a very convenient way to quickly discard the truth and go on with ones life

jimmym1a1 Says:

May 24, 2012 - I'm not arguing anything, but when I see the videos of the plane impacts and the collapse themselves, it looks nothing like a CD to me......PLEASE direct me to another video of a bldg CD where the bldg is CD'd from the TOP DOWN...lolso what 2 planes impacted bldgs and 3 collapsed? the 3rd bldg WAS damaged and burned all day, why do you disregard that?

ddk992 Says:

May 25, 2012 - why would you need an investigation? its blatantly obvious that the evidence leads to the conclusion of a controlled demolition.

TheMajoto Says:

May 26, 2012 - these people are communist all of them Our goverment would never lie to us come on,

gillimaster Says:

May 27, 2012 - one claim is that the building was struck by falling debris. Obviously the damage would've been asymmetrical, but yet the building falls straight down at close to free fall speed. the collapse should've been in the path of least resistance, not most. how could anyone believe the official story?

robinsl27 Says:

May 27, 2012 - building 7 didn't burn all day. it allegedly began burning after building 2 fell which was at or around 1100 A.M the building collapsed at or around 5 p.m. it wasn't the only building hit by debris yet it was the only building to collapse that day. look up the Beijing hotel fire of 2009 or the Windsor fire in 2005 and and other fires that burned for hours and while having some structural damage didn't symmetrically collapse

robinsl27 Says:

May 28, 2012 - yeah I know i mean the government has only gotten caught with things like Iran/Contra Tuskegee experiment, Guatemalan experiments 1948. CIA coups in countries like Iran 1953, Guatemala 1954, Chile 1973 and these are things that are on record but other than this sure they wouldn't do it.

robinsl27 Says:

May 28, 2012 - Communism-a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party. wherein this whole documentary did you hear anything that would make you postulate any of these people are communist,

therealdefjamz Says:

May 28, 2012 - If thermite is what they say did it why do they keep trying to push the people claiming there were loud explosions and shockwaves. Atleast come up with a reasonable story. And why did they leave out the part where part of another building took out part of building 7?

deanguy66 Says:

May 28, 2012 - Why is it so difficult to post this or share it on Facebook? Very unusual.

deanguy66 Says:

May 28, 2012 - I've tried to Share it, but it won't take. This has never happened to me before with a YouTube video.

blackhog42 Says:

May 28, 2012 - We need to create a new youtube, a non corrupt one :)There's been a ton of youtube evil-ness lately, lots of censorship, people are getting unsubscribed from certain channels like this, even Ron Paul's youtube channel got banned... it's getting bad.

nathenism Says:

May 28, 2012 - it was also the only building hit by debris that caught on fire. at least two other buildings sustained more damage from debris yet did not catch fire

robinsl27 Says:

May 28, 2012 - It amazes me that people are so naive or unwilling to admit how odd it is that a building would burn for only 5 to 6 hours and suddenly fall symmetrically. Some people just cannot believe that some people are that evil. I guess they never heard of Hitler, Stalin, or Augusto Pinochet

bigassprick Says:

May 29, 2012 - lol you are so blind. XD