Frank Zappa, Ron Paul, Howard Zinn and Naom Chomsky on American Fascism.flv

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - a more accurate thing for you to say is "i support economic freedom for corporate power." he opposes: environmental regulations, industry/banking regulations, minimum wage, social programs, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, evolution, Americans With Disabilities Act, public healthcare, public education, federal safety standards, foreign aid, gun control (including background checks), the Occupational Health and Safety Act, citizenship for people born in the US to illegal immigrant parents, etc.

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - "Here, the term "libertarian" means the opposite of what it always meant in history. Libertarian throughout modern European history meant socialist anarchist. It meant the anti-state element of the Workers Movement and the Socialist Movement. It sort of broke into two branches, roughly, one statist, one anti-statist. ... So libertarian in Europe always meant socialist. Here it means ultra-conservative -- Ayn Rand or Cato Institute or something like that. But that's a special U.S. usage." Chomsky

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - "Quite apart from practice, I don't suggest that [Hayek, etc.] understood it, but in their 'libertarian' writings these figures were in fact supporting some of the worst kinds of tyranny that can be imagined: namely private tyranny, in principle out of public control. Traditional European libertarian socialism addressed this issue." Chomsky

jonasoblouk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - I oppose environmental "regulations" but I do support laws and consequences written by law-makers, not cronies who write their own "regulations" as they do now. This is also the Paul position. I also oppose oppressive social programs that actually have a long-term net negative for social welfare.I also oppose the Civil rights Act of 1964 which has arguably caused more harm to race relations than simply upholding civil rights as defined in the Constitution.

jonasoblouk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - He is not against or for evolution. Non issue. He and I are against a public mandate to buy healthcare to pad the medical industrial complex. He and I are against the federal meddling of public education, not public education. Where did you get that? I am against borrowing from China to give aid to Israel and such. I am against gun control, but not background checks. Where did you get that? He is not against citizenship of natural born citizens according to the Constitution.

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - you "oppose" environmental regulations - meaning, you feel that corporations should be able to pollute as much as they like, completely devoid of public scrutinywhen you're old and sick and Medicare or Social Security are helping you, i'm sure you won't think that these programs are "oppressive" anymore...you oppose the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and instead prefer to "uphold civil rights as defined in the Constitution", i.e. that black people are three-fifths of a person. founders = slaveowners

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - p.s. he has called evolution a "hoax." if you agree with this, vote Paul...

jonasoblouk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - show me in the constitution where it says that black people are three-fifths of a person. I missed that.

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - Ron Paul wants to end the guarantee to free public education in the US (making it a decision at the state level) in favor of for-profit, privately-owned schools. do you really not know the policies of the person you vehemently defend? ...

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."do you really not know what the Three-Fifths Compromise is? ....

jonasoblouk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - Non issue. I could care less if someone calls it a hoax or not. I do know that eugenicists have used evolution to create classes of people and not give them their god-given rights because they are "less evoloved". It is better to think we are all equal and not denied our god-given rights.

jonasoblouk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - The Three-Fifths compromise was a compromise between Southern and Northern states reached during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 in which three-fifths of the population of slaves would be counted for enumeration purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives. It was proposed by delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman.

jonasoblouk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - Delegates opposed to slavery generally wished to count only the free inhabitants of each state. Delegates supportive of slavery, on the other hand, generally wanted to count slaves in their actual numbers. Since slaves could not vote, slaveholders would thus have the benefit of increased representation in the House and the Electoral College.

jonasoblouk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - The final compromise of counting "all other persons" as only three-fifths of their actual numbers reduced the power of the slave states relative to the original southern proposals, but increased it over the northern position.

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - ok?

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - you're a right-wing Republican creationist...

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - congrats on copy-and-pasting information from Wikipedia on the Three-Fifths Compromise, something you had never heard of until 10 minutes ago...

jonasoblouk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - It was not about black or white, it was about slavery, which was over-turned by the 13th amendment (if I am not mistaken) which is now law of the land. I have not heard that Paul wants to overturn that.

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - i never said that Paul wants to "overturn" the 13th Amendment...

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - because there were /so/ many white slaves, right? .... 

Gunt78 Says:

May 15, 2012 - You didn't answer my question. Are jews over represented in the seats of power?

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

May 15, 2012 - why do you have an obsession with stalking me on youtube to harrass me with anti-semtism?"dipshits"; "stupid"; "ignorant"; "foolish"; "illogical"; "you know i'll own your ass"; "petulant child"; "fool"; "how old are you?"; ":P", "You really do scrape the barrel"; "my poxy opinion"; "fuck off or die"; "you know fuck all"; "you must suffer from mental retardation", "FAIL! Ta ta xx"

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

May 17, 2012 - did you ever figure out the difference between "oxymoron" and "moron"?

DeweyZinnChomskyFisk Says:

May 18, 2012 - NOAM CHOMSKY, HOWARD ZINN, JOHN DEWEY, MICHAEL PARENTI, ARUNDHATI ROY, NAOMI KLEIN, ROBERT FISK, VANDANA SHIVA, RALPH NADER, WARD CHURCHILL, NORMAN FINKELSTEIN, DENNIS KUCINICH, CORNEL WEST, GORE VIDAL, JOHN PILGER, GREG PALAST, ROBERT FISK, EDWARD S. HERMAN, JASON BURKE, EDWARD SAID, BERTRAND RUSSELL, ROBIN HAHNEL, ALEXANDER COCHBURN, ANTHONY ARNOVE, CHALMERS JOHNON, WILLIAM BLOOM, MICHAEL ALBERT, CHRISTIAN PARENTI, MUMIA ABU-JAMAL, AMY GOODMAN, DANIEL ELLSBERG, BILL HICKS, GEORGE CARLIN, etc.