|
|
|
|
Title: 9/11 Inside Job - The Most Damning Evidence Yet!
Added: Apr 19, 2007
Author: WizardofOunces
Duration: 6:9
Description:
9/11 Inside Job - The Most Explosive Evidence Yet! An Experiment using Thermite shows for sure that 9-11 was indeed an Inside Job.This proof is totally irrefutable. Anyone who denies this proof is purely in denial because they can't bare to face the truth that such a henious crime could be carried out by the people we trust to rule over us.
Related Videos:
Videos related to '9/11 Inside Job - The Most Damning Evidence Yet!'
Channel: News
Tags: 9/11 911 terrorism 9-11 bush experiment thermite wtc fox thermate steven jones lecture controlled demolition explosives
9/11 911 terrorism 9-11 bush experiment thermite wtc fox thermate steven jones lecture controlled demolition explosives
Youtube Comments: 14157
Mike2020able Says:
May 14, 2012 - WATCH : THE MILLITARY KNOWS ISRAEL DID 911 , on YouTube .
CitrineVlogging Says:
May 14, 2012 - Israel did not do 9/11, America is helping israel in their war.
ctcole77 Says:
May 15, 2012 - Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific ConsultantsWTC Dust Study2/28/2012"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments." "There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
TimReed22222 Says:
May 19, 2012 - "simply the presence of molten metal requires temperatures only chemical reactions can produce."Are you counting fire as a chemical reaction? Because fire is certainly hot enough to melt many kinds of metal."Thermite WAS used"UNPROVEN; no thermite experts, AFAIK, believe there was thermite at the WTC. Certainly none have endorsed the Jones/Harrit paper, if that's what you're referring to.
RomulanFord Says:
May 19, 2012 - Even if there was thermate, somebody else must have planted the demolition bombs onto each floors of the building recently in the year 2000 a.d. Maybe the bomb planter did not even know about the thermate...
TimReed22222 Says:
May 19, 2012 - "the heat of a fire is dependent on the source of the fire. The source- jetfuel- could not have raised the temperature inside the tower ..."Ah, but you're forgetting something, aren't you?Was jet fuel the ONLY flammable substance in those towers?
TimReed22222 Says:
May 19, 2012 - Fortunately we don't have to "think" about this because we can just look it up. And the answer: Fires of those materials can hit 1000°C - at which steel loses something like 90% of its strength!"Jetfuel was the only substance present within the towers ... with a relatively high burning temp"WRONG; office fires burn MUCH hotter. Many tests have proven this."BELOW what is required to produce molten steel."TRUE BUT IRRELEVANT, as molten steel is an unproven MYTH.
TimReed22222 Says:
May 21, 2012 - And here we see the classic truther hail mary: When losing an argument, change the subject & switch to ad hominem attacks. I schooled you on fire temperatures, molten steel, and more - and you don't even ATTEMPT to defend your arguments! Attacking me personally only shows that you got NOTHING. Truther fail!I'm "ignorant" and "uneducated"? Prove it! Show me where I'm wrong!"only idiots waste there time writing here!" <-- written in your 4th post in the thread! Know what irony is? :-)
zenoist2 Says:
May 24, 2012 - So how do a few small fires make a buildfing catastrophically collapse at proven free fall?As in wtc7?Free fall means there is not a single column ,floor or brick supporting the structure.Nists fire damage theory doesnt fit at all.
zenoist2 Says:
May 24, 2012 - If you look at the wtc7 computer sims on the official NIST site they do not show the free fall period at all.They have the whole building always showing some sort of support when in reality for 2.25 seconds or about 8 floors the whole building had NO support.They also have the whole building deforming and bending totally unlike observed reality.Its very poor and scientically wrong to base on any conclusions on what is patently wrong.I think they need to try again.
GetMurked423 Says:
May 26, 2012 - Even if it was the jetfuel that caused the collapse, it would have taken hours for the fire to melt through steel! Both towers went down in less than an hour! Oh yea and the day that america gets attacked building 7 catches on fire and collapses! But of course everyone who questions 9/11 is a crazy tin foil hat wearing retard!
NoWayOutComputer Says:
May 26, 2012 - Who should I input into the Pentagon No-Way-Out Computer?(1) The one who planted the bombs?(2) Or the one who tried to cover up?
NoWayOutComputer Says:
May 26, 2012 - OK. The Pentagon No-Way-Out Computer shows New Jersey Taj Mahal Casino Owner Donald Trump with his face "shape-shifted" as the bomb planter.But the one who cover it up after it happens.... no result yet.
videogamenerd1000 Says:
May 27, 2012 - What I think happened:People decided to bomb the world trade center for more modern versions of the buildings. They decided to make a major tv story by flying a plane into it at the exact moment the bomb went off to make it look like it was the plane. (I know this is kinda stupid, who would want to kill people just for a tv story?)
U83R8UDDH4 Says:
May 28, 2012 - To have public support for a middle eastern war? Why are we still there if OBL is dead
TimReed22222 Says:
May 28, 2012 - No one ever claimed jet fuel caused the collapse. Nor is molten steel part of any theory. Those are just straw-man arguments.And why are the fires in 7 a mystery? It wasn't a coincidence; everyone knows it was badly damaged by the towers when they collapsed. Uh, you DO know this - don't you?
xxFalconArasxx Says:
May 28, 2012 - Jet Fuel can't melt steel no matter how much time goes buy. The only way Jet Fuel can melt steel is if it was in a Furnace or any other very enclosed area of space.
FOReverYOUng765 Says:
May 28, 2012 - has anyone ever thought that maybe the hijackers brought that chemical with them on the plane...
GetMurked423 Says:
May 28, 2012 - @TimReed22222 Yes but it was'nt damaged enough for it to collapse! See thats where its fishy! It collapsed just like the twin towers when it was'nt even hit by a plane, but yet it fell PERFECTLY into its own foot print, just like the towers! This was the first time in history that a steel structured building colappses demolition style! There was a building in new york that burned for more than a day back in the 60's and it did not collapse!
GetMurked423 Says:
May 28, 2012 - @TimReed22222 i hope your not getting your info from the 9/11 comission report! The same people who left out the firemen and police that head explosions and saw explosions on from the lobby!
TheShredworthy Says:
May 28, 2012 - But it had a VERY bad fire on many floors. Why would he knock down his own building if it would be a financial loss for the owner?
acholidays Says:
May 28, 2012 - CIA used a thermal energy weapon to bring the towers down vaporizing body's, walls, and mutating steel to a liquid from the ground up. weapon held at dugway proving grounds, utah
acholidays Says:
May 28, 2012 - the purpose for this measure of insanity,, under the towers were some of the largest gold reserves for Saudi leaders. gold ways stolen weeks before and replaced with bombs. official story,, the gold disappeared never to be recovered












Mike2020able Says:
May 14, 2012 - THE TIME HAS COME FOR US ALL TO FIND OUR VOICE, SILENCE NO MORE . WATCH : The Millitary KNOWS Israel did 911 , on YouTube .