Hulk Hogan Comes To Help Kurt Angle

lilosi445 Says:

Mar 19, 2012 - Batista/Khali Punjabi Prison(even though that match sucked) had violence. Others I can't think straight off the head but it still sucked though which is my point. Rating is just a rating. It's the writing staff and the boss that can create a good show. That is why WWE sucks, because Vince is losing it.

zontonerwwe9 Says:

Mar 20, 2012 - maybe santino (because he had debuted as a serious wrestler at first),but even if their plans wasn't this stupid comedy wrestler when they brought him,they ended up making him that because again they wanted to move in that direction.and no,there is no doubt that they brought swaggle cause they wanted to target to kids and move to pg.you dont bring a midget dancing around the ring,being in painful-to watch segments and even burying legit wrestlers unless you wanna go in that direction

zontonerwwe9 Says:

Mar 20, 2012 - also you dont seem to understand that im NOT arguing why the pg era started.i know that it was mostly cause of benoit.all im saying is that swaggle,santino etc are a product of the pg era.even with the batista/khali match,its only 5 matches in a whole year.i know its the creative's fault dude,thats my point,that the pg rating can become a problem if the staff doesnt use it correctly,which they haven't.look at roh or chikara,they're pg shows done right.

zontonerwwe9 Says:

Mar 20, 2012 - ***santino & swaggle are a reason of the pg direction that wwe wanted to go with i meant to say,not that these 2 are products of the pg era(cause they were there before pg).

lilosi445 Says:

Mar 20, 2012 - Midgets has always been in WWE. Remember Velocity? They were having midgets wrestle almost every week for a while. Bringing Hornswoggle doesn't mean jack shit. Because if you remember when Swoggle debuted, he wasn't even a face. He was heel with Finlay.

lilosi445 Says:

Mar 20, 2012 - But what you are not getting is that the PG rating isn't why WWE isn't doing bad. Even if they turn TV-14, it doesn't magically make the shows better/

zontonerwwe9 Says:

Mar 21, 2012 - no i dont remember any midget wrestling in wwe.even if they did wrestle it was on velocity,a show that nobody gave a shit about nor watched,it wasnt even televised.a midget,swaggle being on wwe's flagship show,burying legit wrestlers,being in stupid segments & generally getting this push is a whole other story,if you cant see the difference then whatever.turning to tv-14 might not make the show better,but at least they will get rid many of these stupid segments & angles.

lilosi445 Says:

Mar 21, 2012 - Wrong, it was televised for a few years before going on WWE.com. People did care about it and people do know about the midgets that wrestled. Hornswoggle is annoying most of the time, which I agree with you but even if they turn Tv-14, creative still are going to have these types of segments. It's creative/Vince that needs to change, not a silly rating.

zontonerwwe9 Says:

Mar 21, 2012 - but the point is that very few people watched that show and the show had jobbers in tryouts or cruisherweights wrestling for the most part.how can you compare it to swaggle being on raw?its a huge difference,raw is watched by millions of people & its wwe's #1 show.and how do you know that they're still going to have these segments if they turn to tv-14?

lilosi445 Says:

Mar 21, 2012 - Because they still had stupid segments when they were TV-14. You're one of those people who think a rating is going to change the writing. No the writers change the writing, not the rating.

lilosi445 Says:

Mar 21, 2012 - Because they still had stupid segments when they were TV-14. You're one of those people who think a rating is going to change the writing. No the writers change the writing, not the rating.

JohnnyD230 Says:

Mar 24, 2012 - 2:40-2:45 fuckin retarded

existenceisnonsense Says:

Mar 25, 2012 - finally a comment with sense, not to mention the snail like rescue with the entrance taunts lol.

MrMrOlympia Says:

Mar 31, 2012 - LOL u fucking faggot

SSJ4TOM Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - TNA is like WCW when WCW turned into shit. WWE is also shit. RIP Pro Wrestling I'll miss you so much.

zontonerwwe9 Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - and what does it make it 'wcw 2000' dumbass?**rolls eyes and waits for the typical hogan bullshit reply**

zontonerwwe9 Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - like i've said before,they had SOME stupid segments in the attitude & ruthless-agression era but not nearly as much as they have now,thats the difference

SSJ4TOM Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - It's a lot of little things and no Hogan isn't the answer. For the most part it's bad writting. It's a shame because it has a lot of tallented stars and they have to choose between a shit company like WWE where they get buried by bums like Cena or stick with a company that is like 2000-2001 WCW but with even less money. That's just my opinion if you enjoy it then go for it but I long for the days of the Monday Night wars when both shows were amazing as they competed for ratings.

zontonerwwe9 Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - since russo was replaced as the head writer and prichard took his place the pacing,booking and writing of the show has improved.its easy to say that they suck at writing or booking but you dont give any current examples.aside from young/ODB i dont see anything that's 'horrible'..

Rawz7111 Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - they jocked wwe and dx

lilosi445 Says:

Apr 8, 2012 - But what I'm trying to explain is that creative wasn't retarded back then as they are now. Even if they go TV-14, you still are going to have a lot of stupid segments anyway.

XxXHammerOfDawn Says:

Apr 25, 2012 - the rock is the one who made wwe and wwf, but i guess tna is better now that the rock is gone

magicjermaine98 Says:

Apr 28, 2012 - hey! that's kevin nash old theme song! 1:33rockhouse

demario1997 Says:

May 18, 2012 - @XxXhammerofdawn,The rock is good but there were better peeps before him

ethnyks120 Says:

May 18, 2012 - yes that is so much better