|
|
|
|
Title: The Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to Know
Added: Jan 12, 2011
Author: GoogleTechTalks
Duration: 63:43
Description:
Google Tech TalkJanuary 6, 2011Presented by Ron Garret.ABSTRACTRichard Feynman once famously quipped that no one understands quantum mechanics, and popular accounts continue to promulgate the view that QM is an intractable mystery (probably because that helps to sell books). QM is certainly unintuitive, but the idea that no one understands it is far from the truth. In fact, QM is no more difficult to understand than relativity. The problem is that the vast majority of popular accounts of QM are simply flat-out wrong. They are based on the so-called Copenhagen interpretation of QM, which has been thoroughly discredited for decades. It turns out that if Copenhagen were true then it would be possible to communicate faster than light, and hence send signals backwards in time. This talk describes an alternative interpretation based on quantum information theory (QIT) which is consistent with current scientific knowledge. It turns out that there is a simple intuition that makes almost all quantum mysteries simply evaporate, and replaces them with an easily understood (albeit strange) insight: measurement and entanglement are the same physical phenomenon, and you don't really exist.Slides are available here:https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/present/edit?id=0AelF4upZ7VjZZGM1eGttOGJfNDNkenFtNnFkaw&hl=enLink to the paper:http://www.flownet.com/ron/QM.pdfAbout the speaker:Dr. Ron Garret was an AI and robotics researcher at the NASA Jet Propulsion Lab for fifteen years before taking a year off to work at Google in June of 2000. He was the lead engineer on the first release of AdWords, and the original author of the Google Translation Console. Since leaving Google he has started a new career as an entrepreneur, angel investor and filmmaker. He has co-founded three startups, invested in a dozen others, and made a feature-length documentary about homelessness.
Related Videos:
Videos related to 'The Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to Know'
Channel: Tech
Tags: google tech talk quantum mechanics
google tech talk quantum mechanics
Youtube Comments: 361
KaanOnay Says:
May 10, 2012 - Physics (one) is going in to QM (zero) and we are about give birth. The new creation will be VERY NEW. We will know the purpose by the other One which comes to the mistake from same Source but later like Zero and first One. The key is to know women. I came to conclusion from opposite way of our knowledge. It's very easy "start from zero and create everything step by step without knowledge". Seven steps are enough to create Life. Arrival 8th, Now is 9th, future will be 1&0 in return order 10.
evolivid Says:
May 10, 2012 - so what is a photon made of ... cause if it has energy I can calculate its mass..
KaanOnay Says:
May 10, 2012 - (1) It is about existence of zero. Mr. Ron Garret explains very well but the conclusion is zero and it's true. QM is all about the relation of zero that's why everything affects everything. That why; we can't make measurement in QM. Reality is together with "zero QM" & "one Physics", it means zero and one is together one reality. The base of the particle is the same. It has one seed and zero emptiness and basically emptiness is in hexagon shape.
KaanOnay Says:
May 10, 2012 - (2) Circular Hexagon shape is actually seven sided, missing or abstract side is "seed in time" or "one reality in time" side. For the particle seventh side is solid, sixth emptiness side is abstract. If you draw the opposite reality of particle, you draw a circle, which hexagon fits inside with its angles but when you made the emptiness solid by drawing the circle you can't see the abstract seed. You can draw one circle like in the two slit experiment but can't fit the many emptiness together.
KaanOnay Says:
May 10, 2012 - In my video, Sphere has two centers; here, circle become with 7 elements, reality base on 1=0; are you ready more interesting things. Practically humanity can change the reality. I mean the base reality (whole universe) which is QM or we can say Pi number can become bigger than present one. Actually at the base Pi, zero, QM, duality, moment are the same things. I finish my first book it's about to publish in Turkish. It's about Love and Honesty (Believe me it's the same topic)
KaanOnay Says:
May 10, 2012 - At the end of part (2) a centence is missing (sorry) when you draw the particles with their emptiness you can't leave the spaces between circles empty because you are drawing the reality with emptiness. You must draw hexagons. (also another missing explanation) circle has missing 7th angle. If it's a particle, the missing angle is seed and solid. If it's a solid circle, the missing angle is "abstract seed". Also Love is zero and Honesty is one. I found the way to combine QM Science Love Honesty.
KaanOnay Says:
May 10, 2012 - At the end of part (2) a centence is missing (sorry) when you draw the particles with their emptiness you can't leave the spaces between circles empty because you are drawing the reality with emptiness. You must draw hexagons. (also another missing explanation) circle has missing 7th angle. If it's a particle, the missing angle is seed and solid. If it's a solid circle, the missing angle is "abstract seed". Also Love is zero and Honesty is one. I found the way to combine QM Science Love Honesty
mantrap9 Says:
May 10, 2012 - Zhuangzi, Rene Descartes, Max Tegmark and you. It's nice to not be alone in my thoughts.
KaanOnay Says:
May 11, 2012 - My video is "What Zero is: The Quantum Moment vs. Speed Reality"
krshna77 Says:
May 12, 2012 - @KaanOnay you need to do 2 things: learn English, and stop sniffing coke.
KaanOnay Says:
May 13, 2012 - (1) You are right about English. Nobody is helping me, I'm doing my best. This is wrong platform for conversation but readers may think like you. I don't use even alcohol. Just because people think that "there is a mystery in it" I'm solving two slit experiment. These stuff (QM, Science, Religion and knowledge) your thinking barrier the right way. I know everything and I can solve every problem you have, try me but not the knowledge type questions; it must be about the base (very big challenge).
KaanOnay Says:
May 13, 2012 - (2) How do I? I can teach and you can do the same thing. This is my main purpose but people think one person cannot know everything together with nothing. Actually I know "what means nothing" more than "Everything". What if your perception about me is wrong? Don't you want to know everything? If you have doubts just listen! I didn't pass the knowledge of Einstein, Stephen Hawking or Ron Garret. On my video, I gave the definition of Dark Energy. It looks, I passed Stephen Hawking but it's not.
KaanOnay Says:
May 13, 2012 - (3) I came to my "one conclusion" from opposite direction of knowledge; I came to "One" from "Minus One" by passing the "Zero", of course by chance and things a lot simple than you think. Eventually my thoughts will be accepted, because there is only one Truth and my structure fits all. Are you the person who listens with open mind? I guess not. Your mind is opening about me with coke (Hopelessness). I have full of hope for the future but not in this way, your attitude is part of the wrong way.
KaanOnay Says:
May 13, 2012 - (4) I'm thinking with "Minus One" it took ten years, of course when somebody think very different, he's alone. Humanity is trying to think with knowledge which is "One". That's why, from "One" (knowledge) "Zero" (QM) very weird but from "Minus One", "One" and "Zero" together. Humanity difference in the universe is "Minus One" and a "NEW" thing to old universe is coming from there.
KaanOnay Says:
May 13, 2012 - (5) After closing the "open subject QM" from knowledge direction, there is beyond it, which is "Minus One" but we already have Minus One and we are the same. I'm not special person but I know that I'm "Us". Only women don't know that we are US. I solved the dilemma; QM, Religion etc. the result is women. We can't do anything without "women intelligence" which is not exist. A being couldn't participate in the humanity intelligence and progress, except its female function; it's unacceptable.
KaanOnay Says:
May 13, 2012 - (4) I'm thinking with "Minus One" it took ten years, of course when somebody think very different, he's alone. Humanity is trying to think with knowledge which is "One". That's why, from "One" (knowledge) "Zero" (QM) very weird but from "Minus One", "One" and "Zero" together. Humanity difference in the universe is "Minus One" and a "NEW" thing to old universe is coming from there.
KaanOnay Says:
May 13, 2012 - (5) After closing the "open subject QM" from knowledge direction, there is beyond it, which is "Minus One" but we already have Minus One and we are the same. I'm not special person but I know that I'm "Us". Only women don't know that we are US. I solved the dilemma; QM, Religion etc. the result is women. We can't do anything without "women intelligence" which is not exist. A being couldn't participate in the humanity intelligence and progress, except its female function; it's unacceptable.
KaanOnay Says:
May 13, 2012 - (6) Men don't mean Humanity and unfortunately human intelligence can't be defined together with Women ( in the field of finding NEW things). Minus One finds only NEW things. Man finds Men found the new things; look to the history but the thing must be New. I cannot accept that my mother or my daughter not human and they cannot find the new things, history says the opposite. I found the solution which Stephen Hawking admits that he couldn't find. Women mystery is a lot complicated than QM.
KaanOnay Says:
May 13, 2012 - (7) We must start to learn from zero (QM), then One (knowledge) make sense. If we want to start from zero we must be at Minus One. Men are reaching Minus One to find the new, but "who is we". In the minus one area there is no women; in the intelligence history we are the half of us. A woman can understand everything better but men couldn't take them to Minus One area. If we manage it, I don't need to explain these, she explains better than me. This will be end of philosophers and the problems.
karnak99 Says:
May 20, 2012 - KaanOnay is full of shit.
karnak99 Says:
May 20, 2012 - Also, while I really appreciate this talk and was talking notes and doing my own research and such at the same time......why was the production value and editing of this talk so gawd awful?
KaanOnay Says:
May 21, 2012 - Man means: Finding NEW things; at least, recognizing the NEW. NEW means: not exist before. I had thousands of new ideas about everything; they were all crazy because they were NEW. This much crazy ideas mean nothing without a base. I found the base also. Now you will be crazy like me. The base is only ONE, beyond everything. Stop shit stuff and being a male, find something new; at least understand the NEW. Be a man.
tttdolph Says:
May 22, 2012 - already done.It is exactly what he referred to in the talk as sending morse code instanteously.B. Dopfer, Zwei Experimente zur Interferenz von Zwei-Photonen Zust¨anden,University of Innsbruck 1998
HigherThanTrump Says:
May 28, 2012 - Wow KaanOnay, get a fucking life n stop filling up the comment section of this video
mattdd05 Says:
May 10, 2012 - I watched your video and can't really understand, can you explain a little more. It sounds interesting.