Scientists simulate jet colliding with World Trade Center

EterIronGen Says:

May 28, 2012 - a TSUNAMI can`t = an Aluminium plane, a TSUNAMI it`s a continues force can't be compared to an obj. and it has a lot of mass and hight, which produce pressure, this is a stupid comparison I did say it a lot of times, yes it can demonstrate that mass even as water has power which I never said other ways, but aluminium was 6 tims less in thickness and 3 time less in density which makes it 18n times less in resistance, NO? so calculate now the pressure on the columns 1 of 19parts of force.

Merlin5by5 Says:

May 28, 2012 - LOL, of course it equals an airplane, moron, because F=MAexplains that water has weight, and was accelerated past all thatIndian Ocean steel, exerting a force that destroyed it. Water isa LOT less dense, or mechanically strong, than aluminum, and steel, yet it's capable of destroying both. Isn't your argument thata less dense, less strong material can't destroy a denser, harderone? Looks pretty straight forward to me. Maybe you just can'tcalculate a damn thing with your theories, Ay?

Merlin5by5 Says:

May 28, 2012 - Oh, by the way, your jackshit 6 times less in thickness, and 3 timesless in density does NOT make it 18n times less in resistance.Pound for pound, Aluminum is stronger than steel, because you canuse more of it, for any given application where weight is a factor.That's why we have aluminum airplanes in the first place, Idiot.

AlQaedaIsReal Says:

May 28, 2012 - I come to this site and just stare in disbelief at the postings by goofy people that claim a large jetliner going at the speed of a bullet isn't going to do Major_Damage.pathetic, really...

MrSkunkwork100 Says:

May 28, 2012 - Since you tried to compare a hair strand moving at the speed of light to a plane impacting a building, you're not going to be able to comprehend basic physics, proven by your posts here. All you have to do, is get an education and test your theories. A tsunami is mass with acceleration, which gives it force and thereby, damage sustained as a result of it can be quantified.

MrSkunkwork100 Says:

May 28, 2012 - Speaking of damage, a person can take carbide steel and gently knock another piece of carbide steel and cause irreversable damage. Carbide steel is much, much stronger and more durable than structural steel. Structural steel can be banged with hammers and be dented and deformed. That's partly why it is used in buildings, because the DUCTILITY also provides some built-in inertia. The mass of the plane, with acceleration, dicates the force it applied at impact. Force is a product of energy.

MrSkunkwork100 Says:

May 28, 2012 - There were only a few pounds of steel per cu. ft. of area: you keep talking about density. Meanwhile, the plane had not only mass, but was assisted both by kinetic energy and chemical energy upon impact. The density of the plane vs the building (in the impact region), were actually very similar. In total, the building was 95% air. You have to explain how an object of mostly air is going to restrain an impact of an object that is moving at high speed and contains more density per unit measure.

SkullCrusherGh0st Says:

May 28, 2012 - MICKEY MOUSE PROPAGANDA FARCE IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE !!!!I SUCK CHENEYS DICK TOO FOR $

xbotdebunkiesuck322 Says:

May 28, 2012 - MICKEY MOUSE PROPAGANDA FARCE IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE !!!!I SUCK CHENEYS DICK TOO FOR $

ybot debunX Says:

May 28, 2012 - MICKEY MOUSE PROPAGANDA FARCE IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE !!!!I SUCK CHENEYS DICK TOO FOR $

cdddcraftsman Says:

May 28, 2012 - PROPAGANDA FARCE IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE !!!!

cdddcraftsman Says:

May 28, 2012 - WE ARE ON THE BRINK OF EXTINCTION FOR PROFIT ! 

TheTribunal2013 Says:

May 28, 2012 - AMERICAN SCIENCE FINALLY COMES DOWN TO A MICKEY MOUSE NIVEAU PROPAGANDA TOOL.

ZbotDebunkaSuk323 Says:

May 28, 2012 - w w w. ae911truth . o r g

ZbotDebunkaSuk323 Says:

May 28, 2012 - american scientists got fucked in the a** by dick cheney then made some anal-y-sis and finally found out:a) the earth is a flat quadrat floating on molten steel , (people who say it's a sphere are conspiracy nuts)b) a lightwheight alluminium plane can be swallowed by massive concrete steel building - generating a pyroclastic cloud +rivers of molten steelc) a boing 757 fits in a 16ft hole in the pentagond) .... we need a new pearl harbore) massive steel corebeams weaken at 700° officefire

ZbotDebunkaSuk323 Says:

May 28, 2012 - AMERICAN SCIENCE comes down to FOXNEWS NIVEAU.

ybot debunX Says:

May 28, 2012 - purdue scientists got fucked in the a** by dick cheney  then made some anal-y-sis and finally found out:a) the earth is a flat quadrat floating on molten steel , (people who say it's a sphere are conspiracy nuts)b) a lightwheight alluminium plane can be swallowed by massive concrete steel building - generating a pyroclastic cloud +rivers of molten steel

ybot debunX Says:

May 28, 2012 - w w w. ae911truth . o r gTRUTH WELL TOLD !!!

Merlin5by5 Says:

May 28, 2012 - I understand you are a typical 9/11 SNOT for brains, How ya doing?a. The earth is a sphere in space, and you are a faggot.b. An aluminum airliner weighing 200 tons at 500 mph punched thrua skycraper that was 96% air. Yup.c. A Boeing 757 fits into a 22 ft hole pretty well, its a 13 ft oval.d. PANY, dead some 7 years.e. ANY steel weakens well under 700 C, try as little as 450 C.at 700 C, they have lost 90% of their original rated strength.f. YUP, you still got SNOT for brains.

Merlin5by5 Says:

May 28, 2012 - I Understand you are another puppet account, created by a SNOT4 Brains Truther, who needs to pretend he belongs to a growingMoooooooovement, when actually, you belong to a tiny coterie ofinsignificant assholes, and are far fewer than most other internetnut groups, like UFO nuts, LochNess Monster nuts, and AncientAstronaut nuts. Kinda pathetic, huh?

ptplayhouse Says:

May 28, 2012 - I don't know what this video is attempting to explain. Because what I saw on 9/11 was two big aluminum cigar tubes with jet fuel pulverize two 1,000 foot buildings of steel and concrete in ten seconds each. Oh yeah. And there was that third one that committed suicide in solidarity.

hgfbob Says:

May 29, 2012 - "b. An aluminum airliner "that INVESTIGATION found caused 14.5% localized asymmetrical damage to each tower leaving 240 intact fireproofed vertical support that MUST simultaneously fail for the GLOBAL unified descent WE ALL SEE.try as little as 450 C"how about 250C MErLIE?"no core column examined showed temp. above 250C" NIST 1-3 p.95,101,132where is the 'REPRESENTATION' of the HYPOTHESIZED HIGH TEMP steel that FAILED from the fires presentyup you still got SNOT, [shit], for brains.

hgfbob Says:

May 29, 2012 - "groups, like UFO nuts, LochNess Monster nuts, and Ancient Astronaut nuts. Kinda pathetic, huh"sure MErLIE...equating asking question s and DEMANDING answer to BigFoot and the LocNess monster.question?how does on OFFICIALLY CLAIM YEARS AFTER SCIENTIFIC investigation that "NO explosives or accelerants were used" when investigation never tested.Presenting a CLAIM within a scientific context by using no actual experiment, testing or investigation to validate the claim, is called BULLSHIT!

hgfbob Says:

May 29, 2012 - "You have to explain how an object of mostly air is going to restrain an impact of an object that is moving at high speed "lol.."mostly air"??33 outer columns were damaged out of 236 outer columns which comes out to 14%, count the columns yourself in any image or video that shows the holes.. NIST estimates that 6-8 core columns 7 out of 47 comes out to 15% leaving 85% of the core columns intact and undamaged.why don't YOU explain why impacts caused only 14.5% localized asymmetrical damage?

hgfbob Says:

May 29, 2012 - "SNOT4 Brains Truther"NIST 1-3, 6.8.7 "at the moment of collapse of WTC2 the top portion of the building was found to have moved to the west as it tilted to the southeast".well how the fuck does that occur?240 intact vertical support remain, the tipping top didn't just tilt, it SPUN, as investigation found BEFORE it impacts with it's lower self, ONLY possible by COMPLETE severance from the framework below.You have NO EVIDENCE to give directions to a HYPOTHESIS that FIRE is the cause.