Ed Munyak, FPE - Fire Protection Engineer - AE911Truth.org

danp5648 Says:

May 23, 2011 - The next time you visit NYC please visit the New York Police Museum because they have on display WTC Meteorites from building 6 melted concrete rocks with documents from WTC 1 & 2 embedded.. view .nycpm.org/exhibitions/911/ind­ex.html for the address and times its open and archive.org/details/NewYorkPol­iceMuseumWtcGunsMelted for HD photo and watch?v=7RhdBxEe_6M video New York Police Museum. So yes really, take the red pill and go visit film and report back.

Funkadelic2 Says:

Jun 3, 2011 - Folks, it IS important that you show your sympathy with those seeking a new investigation, but it is important too, to really sign the petitions actually demanding a new, real, IMPARTIAL investigation:w w w 2.ae911truth. org/signpetition. p h pThank you.

cappucinokid100 Says:

Jun 12, 2011 - Richard Gage (AE911Truth) Talk @ Cambridge University UK 18th June 2011 (ALL WELCOME) See the featured video on my channel for full details.

josephortizgarcia Says:

Jun 22, 2011 - Damn good point, bravo!

shanna1950 Says:

Aug 17, 2011 - who gave the order to have all the evidence scooped up and recycled (in China?) before it was examined? Highly suspect. The ones who gave the order to have the evidence destroyed are the ones who know more of this disaster.

bobbyphx Says:

Sep 15, 2011 - i can't wait to see people rebuttal this video lol goooooooooooood luck, there is all your scientific evidence by scientists and experts, just like you asked. /argument

lolzroflcopterzzz Says:

Apr 1, 2012 - Detonated? Alright. Would you mind explaining a little bit further on when "they" secretly managed to sneak into both the towers and place explosives on every floor?

delatroy Says:

Apr 1, 2012 - We can't say for sure. Someone who has access though would be a good start :)We can't know who or how they planted them but it's sure that they were planted based on the evidence.

lolzroflcopterzzz Says:

Apr 1, 2012 - Based on what evidence? Could you, in your own words, please put forward some hard-hitting evidence for your theory? Futhermore, you can not simply just walk into someone's office and plant explosives there without being noticed, especially if we are talking about the World Trade Center towers. Please, consider how much explosives we are talking about and the amout of resources if would require. That, alone, shows just how pathetic this theory is. I'm sorry.

delatroy Says:

Apr 1, 2012 - /watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ

lolzroflcopterzzz Says:

Apr 2, 2012 - Great stuff. Would you like to summarize it? And I'm sorry, but there are no such things as silent explosives.

delatroy Says:

Apr 2, 2012 - Did you watch it? They talk about the use of incendiaries not explosives that are traditionally used in controlled demolition. If you don't believe the contents of that video, then either you don't have a rationale mind or you are arguing against Newton and Einstein. Yes we can speculate on who did it and why, but the collapse on 9/11 was a physical event and as such, there's no room for opinions about how the buildings came down - only data, analysis and published hypotheses.

lolzroflcopterzzz Says:

Apr 2, 2012 - No, actually I didn't, although I will today. But the thing is - since it is impossible for some secret organisation to sneak into both towers and fill them with silent explosives or incendiaries to begin with, then the data arguing for something in that direction is probably fraudulent. Rationale mind? You tell me. You will always have a couple of historians who deny the Holocaust or biologists who deny evolution - but the fact is, the majority of experts disagree with these theories.

delatroy Says:

Apr 2, 2012 - The physical evidence is overwhelming and undeniable for controlled demolition. Whatever was required to proceed that must have occurred however difficult or unbelivable. End of story. I might point out that you might be more sympathetic to my position if you see AE911Truth and other's findings before drawing any conclusions. On the face of it, I compeltly agree with you in that it seems utterly surreal and therefore must be wrong, but it simply must be the case based on the physical evidence.

lolzroflcopterzzz Says:

Apr 2, 2012 - The physical evidence is not overwhelming. Actually, the collapse of the towers had no special hallmarks for a controlled demolition. No free-fall speed, the inner core did not go first, the towers did not fall into their own footprints. And as for the thermate cutter charges, no chemical signatures can prove that thermate was used.

delatroy Says:

Apr 2, 2012 - mm kay :)

lolzroflcopterzzz Says:

Apr 2, 2012 - Don't you agree? So, if we put those facts aside - what evidence is overwhelming and undeniable for a controlled demolition?

delatroy Says:

Apr 2, 2012 - It's all in the video that's presented far better than I could. If you don't want to watch it then it's pointless to argue. See you.

lolzroflcopterzzz Says:

Apr 2, 2012 - Well, since I can't argue with these guys on the video (and as you said, they present it far better), and since you replied to my comment...

Northeastbaseball Says:

Apr 30, 2012 - @delatroy Than explain, if nano-thermite was painted on to the columns in the WTC, that why does the building burn for 1 hour? Wouldnt the plane crash and resulting fires give the spark for nano-thermite to explode immeditatly?? I guess that question wasn't asked of this guy??

delatroy Says:

May 1, 2012 - No, fire does not ignite thermite. Look it up on wikipedia.

Northeastbaseball Says:

May 1, 2012 - @delatroy Too bad just about all the ignition sources uses some sort of flame (fire)....Thats from Wikipedia.

Northeastbaseball Says:

May 1, 2012 - I like how compares two different fires, that were started by different circumstances, Two seperate constructions (The WTC was Tube in a Tube design with steel truss design, One Meridan Plaza wasn't).Not to mention that One Meridan Plaza wasnt hit by plane, and the building structure wasn't compromised.And im a Fire Science major.

delatroy Says:

May 2, 2012 - I think you've cracked it - Osama Bin Laden flew the planes into the buildings to ignite the tons of nanothermite he planted there earlier!

Northeastbaseball Says:

May 2, 2012 - @delatroy dude??? really?? Just how would he get in there?? Explain that one to me.