Kubrick at 2001 opening

Idattani Says:

Oct 6, 2011 - aww, did the poor Kubrick fanboy get all upset and sniffly? Fact is there are at least 30 directors i could name off the top of my head that are CLEARLY better than Kubrick, and most people that know cinema existed before the 70's feel the same.

Eneru89 Says:

Oct 6, 2011 - well do youknow who is Carlo Verdone?No i think youdon't. Making a film is likewriting a book,it can becomplex and artistically sublime,but if itdoesn't excite you, or teach you nothing orsimply doesn't makeyou happy,that'snotagoodmovie.The fact that youcame onYouTube tosay that Kubrick is crap,tells us thatKubrick hits you.Sodon't be immature,eachdirector is great,but not all hit the same way.I cannot have seen every film evermade, but that doesn'tmeanthat thosewholikeKubrickarejerk.

scorpiowatertiger Says:

Oct 13, 2011 - I'm with 'Dgamer21': Kubrick is the most brilliant moviegoer who ever vowed to make better films than the B-movies he grew up watching. I just saw for the first time since 1968 a 70mm print of "2001" screened at Seattle's Cinerama Theatre, and noticed for the first time that the orbiting nuclear weapons platform from the famous 'match-cut' has a French air force roundel painted on its side!

peopledick Says:

Nov 6, 2011 - An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.My BLOG contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "SAM ZURICK" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!

jsilence418 Says:

Dec 3, 2011 - Lol you are playing the " better than" game where art is concerned? go home and read your donald duck comics little boy ,come back when you have grown up... considerably.

Idattani Says:

Dec 4, 2011 - Yep just like i thought, you can't dispute that either of those directors i listed are better than the overrated Kubrick. Go home and watch Godard little boy, come back when you have seen TRUE ART, not pretentiousness masquerading as art.

jsilence418 Says:

Dec 4, 2011 - I just did dipute it stupid lol and you lost! too ashamed to come up with a good response? go home and watch your tarantino films like a good loser.

Idattani Says:

Dec 5, 2011 - You didn't dispute it any way, you simply resorted to petulant slurs like most Kubrick-geeks do when backed into a corner. Tarantino? I would think someone like you who thinks Stanley K is the quintessence of good art and taste would be more inclined to gravitate toward Tarantino being that his work is seeping with an almost equal amount of pretentiousness. ROFL. Bet you have never seen an Ozu film.

jsilence418 Says:

Dec 5, 2011 - Correct I have never seen an Ozu film. If I had, I have no doubt I would pick up all his idiosyncrasies. while you were picking up pop corn! you on the other hand could not nor have sat through any Svanmajer film!

Idattani Says:

Dec 6, 2011 - hahahaha I knew it, just proves my point that Kubrick-geeks have never even experienced true art on the level of Ozu but think they have divine right to anoint Kubrick as best director that ever lived, while continuing to be blissfully ignorant of the true masters of the craft!

faridjabba Says:

Dec 7, 2011 - is this the only videotaped iv of kubrich?

StrawberryJungle Says:

Dec 23, 2011 - You can try and be a film hipster all you want. Throwing out obscure names here and there to try and prove your 'intelligence'. You say Kubrick is pretentious? YOU are pretentious. Also just a footnote: Kubrick ISN'T pretentious, he is a true cinematic artist and just because he's well known it does not diminish that. His films are warm but can be exuberantly chilling and they sit in the brain long after the initial viewing.

Idattani Says:

Dec 24, 2011 - How are those names even obscure? The point i am making is that it is complete ignorance for people to assert Kubrick as the head honcho of filmmaking when they haven't even seen or studied the work of such essential directors as Ozu, Bresson or Godard to name just a few.

StrawberryJungle Says:

Dec 26, 2011 - Can you not just accept that film is subjective? You think you're right about him not being the best film maker but perhaps his films just don't appeal to you as much as Ozu, Bresson or Godard's. To someone else, Kubrick's films may completely resonate with them or they may find his style particularly beautiful or moving. Also, how do you know that Kubrick fans haven't studied these other directors? It's very ignorant of you to assume that they haven't.

johnediamond Says:

Dec 28, 2011 - he is right of course...100 billion stars each with about 8 planets....that's 800 billion planets in our galaxy the Milky Way...that's 1 galaxy in the midst of trillions...however it seems that nature made the distance between stars to be vast so as to have no relationship between any two solar systems...he wants us separate from other worlds..

hyghiaumtym Says:

Feb 10, 2012 - WE'RE NOT WORTHY! <3

edshu3 Says:

Feb 21, 2012 - Wayne's World reference?

hyghiaumtym Says:

Feb 21, 2012 - yezzir ;)

robertlagogi Says:

Mar 11, 2012 - what?

onezkyrideRO Says:

Mar 14, 2012 - So rare seeing him give an interview...

screamwriter1 Says:

Mar 18, 2012 - I bow to this man.