Motorweek: 2010 Ford Taurus SHO AWD

ohguy1991 Says:

Jan 9, 2012 - John Davis is the shit!

BigGameChuck Says:

Jan 17, 2012 - LOL. This guy hasn't changed a bit from the early 90's. Sounds and looks the exact same.

Redrebel98 Says:

Jan 22, 2012 - so the sho 3.5L gives the power of a v8 as well as the same gas mileage as a v8?

76carmel Says:

Jan 23, 2012 - I don't think Sonata, Camry, and Accord compares to Taurus. Fusion does. Fusion is a mid-size; Taurus is a full size. For a true comparison to the Ford Taurus -- try Hyundai Azera or Hyundai Genesis, Toyota Avalon, Nissan Maxima, and Chrysler 300/Dodge Charger.

videsos4040 Says:

Jan 29, 2012 - I traded in my 2008 Honda accord EX V6 for a 2011 Ford Taurus SHO AWD,pros.. a lot more power than honda ( when you step on the gas you can instantly feel the power, unlike my old Honda) , nicer interior, the interior is really quiet, cons. mileage

206sole Says:

Jan 29, 2012 - ford made such a bad name for themselves building those cheap tauru's in the late 90's they deserve to go bankrupt.

Yabs2k Says:

Feb 1, 2012 - the Taurus suffered from many bad badges like when ford'decided to drop and rename it the 500 and then dropped that and names it the taurus'x....using the freestyle body..what gives

HamadHHAG Says:

Feb 10, 2012 - Check out the 2013 Taurusit Replaces the 3.5L 263 HP and 249 Lb-Ft Torque withthe 3.5L 290 HP and 255 Lb-Ft Torqueand adds an optional 2.0L Ecoboost with the 3.5L Ecoboostthe two litre Ecoboost will be availabe on most of Ford Vehicels like the 2013 Fusion

jg20132013 Says:

Mar 4, 2012 - large, sexy, heavy but still real fast...i just jizzed my pants

jg20132013 Says:

Mar 4, 2012 - @cardude1992 no, taurus means bull idiot

WheresMyXR8 Says:

Mar 31, 2012 - ...i thought striking twice was always a reference to lightning.. but thats john davis, not from KoRn (love Korn, btw).. so i'll let it go

abdu2s Says:

Apr 8, 2012 - heavier car means shitty MPG rates , shitty braking ability

unclesnotknuckle1 Says:

Apr 13, 2012 - Just drove one today. SHO is slow. It sure as hell didn't feel like 365 horse to me. I was terribly disappointed, especially for 50 grand. Sucker-mobile. I hate Chrysler but one would be far better off with an srt. At least they're powerful.

RaguelAngelofBalance Says:

Apr 15, 2012 - Its ECHONOMIC not EEKONOMIC!

PwnageMewsic Says:

Apr 22, 2012 - Damn good looking car.

BGKO1992 Says:

May 12, 2012 - is it fwd or rwd ?

NotHalfBadFilms Says:

May 13, 2012 - awd i believe

BluePancake1000 Says:

May 14, 2012 - I find that larger cars handle better, and they feel safer because they don't blow around on the highway.

sleaton1547 Says:

May 14, 2012 - That's the first time I've ever heard someone refer to the 1st gen. Taurus as having a"coke bottle shape."

golchak Says:

May 22, 2012 - I can not imagine MotorWeek, or any other good program about cars, with the absence of John DavisLong live John!

HottestGuyOnInternet Says:

May 23, 2012 - lol you're comparing a srt to a taurus? hahahaha that's like comparing a gt500 to a r/t challenger

unclesnotknuckle1 Says:

May 23, 2012 - Yeah. The srt is less money

unclesnotknuckle1 Says:

May 24, 2012 - If you'd pay 50 thousand for an SHO that's cool, but I sure as hell wouldn't

JennaHaze2000 Says:

May 27, 2012 - Ford Company : Hi guys, can we make the new Ford Taurus Bigger and more Expensive?Public; Sure Ford go ahead, we make tons of money at our Walmart jobs. Just make sure to add tons unnecessary options and make it completely unserviceable by the average backyard mechanic. There is very good reasons 1960 VW beetles are still rolling around.

aningloriusjude Says:

May 27, 2012 - its FWD with the option for AWD but the SHO is always AWD