Star Trek: How It Should Have Ended

prodasspro Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - @speedyrs09 yeah since the boosters were unable to counter act the pull of the black hole they're screwd either way. physics ftw!

pskullv Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - We finally have a way to make a crossover possible.

Museatlantis Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - I laughed so much at this, great ending

rza884 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - @Squids97 unfortanately until now lucas had lost its creativity

makattackmiler Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - Kirk: Mr. Sulu... take us into the black hole.Sulu: Yes Sir ;)

AgentStark427 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - 599 people are JJFags

FlyFreeSkyline Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - @Squids97 Oh, I think that the fact that Spock materialized and vulcan-pinched Darth Vader is proof against that statement, sir.

Crowley9 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - Spock is actually wrong here. Weight (or rather mass) does have significance in their situation. F=ma, which means that with less mass you get more acceleration out of the same amount of force.

metricmine Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - That's right, the lens flares in the ship was really annoying. Love the ending. Didn't expect that at all.

domainestickem Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - @Crowley9 force= mass X acceleration is an equation used HERE ON EARTH, not in space

metricmine Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - @domainestickem The black hole is a gravitational force just like gravity on earth. So less mass does make a difference in their situation. This means the engines have to overcome less weight from the mass in the gravitational field.

DigGil3 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - @domainestickem F=MA still works on space... It works specially in space as there isn't any variables like air drag and gravity changing the result.

VexatiousByBlood Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - @Playstation3userr yeah. that's the joke. 

VexatiousByBlood Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - thumbs up if you're laughing at the people arguing astro physics on a video that's a parody of a movie that's a reboot of a show that's like thirty years old.

IbonkDonkeys Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - the end made me lol

MrNerdzattack Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - it's not true what spock said about no weight in space because black hole have a very big gravity so loosing weight would actually work...

PSByte Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - F = ma falls apart at relativistic speeds, at which point E = mc^2 works much better. However, Star Trek and Star Wars completely blow both equations out the window.

Dagaroth10 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - @MrNerdzattack No, it would just suck you in faster >_>

Whiskey21882 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - @EpicRavenclaw42 I sense a thumb whore in my presence.

Jokester605 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - Weight and mass are complete

Jokester605 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - Sorry, as I was saying, completely different things, while weight has no effect in space (because weight is caused by gravity), while mass makes all the difference, and black holes are extremely massive, not extremely heavy

Cobra41PW Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - If you go into a black hole your ripped to pieces

reachfanatic1234 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - 2:14 just as he says "space" start reading the first line of the descriptions

sargentjohnson7 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - actually, time is affected by gravity, so when they get sucked into the hole, time for them will slow down and eventually stop, and they'll be in infinite suspended animation. Forever.

JeiimuzuKun Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - Star wars pwns.