|
|
|
|
Title: CBC - The Fifth Estate - The Unofficial Story - Pt 1-5
Added: Nov 28, 2009
Author: Steeper33
Duration: 9:48
Description:
JOIN The Discussion at: http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/discussion/2009/11/the_unofficial_story.html#commentsOn September 11, 2001 the world watched in shock and disbelief as planes flew in to New Yorks World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington, and Americans realized they were under attack. But by whom? What really happened? In The Unofficial Story, the fifth estates Bob McKeown introduces us to people who believe the real force behind the attacks was not Osama Bin Laden, but the U.S. government itself. Emerging from the dust and debris that day was a movement, known these days as 9/11 Truth or truthers people who believe that 9/11 was part of a vast conspiracy and cover-up by a criminal faction within the U.S. government. As the fifth estate reports, public opinion polls now show that the majority of Americans believe the Bush Administration had advance knowledge of those attacks and somehow allowed them to happen and that one-third of Canadians share the same belief.In The Unofficial Story, Bob McKeown explores why these questions and theories are growing in popularity. Youll meet some of the leading proponents of truther theories: Richard Gage, an American architect, explains how the WTC twin towers and the lesser known Tower #7 could only have crumbled as they did due to explosive charges placed inside the buildings. Others, including Canadian professor Kee Dewdney, insist that the story of the brave fight by the passengers of United Airlines Flight 93 must have been a hoax. But, youll also hear from others who dispel truther theories and try to understand why, from JFKs assassination to the moon landing to 9/11, a culture of conspiracy springs up around certain historic events. Despite the difference of opinion between those who blame the hijackers and those who blame their own government, the real importance of the fight over 9/11 truth is that it may have less to do with the past than the future.Full Length and Interviews Here:http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truthhttp://www.ae911truth.org/NYC Coalition For Accountability Nowhttp://nyccan.org/index.phpRichard Gage, David Ray Griffin, Daniel Sunjata, Barrie Zwicker. 9/11 Truth NowFull Credit to SaveOurSovereignty3, Please Subscribe:http://www.youtube.com/user/SaveOurSovereignty3
Related Videos:
Videos related to 'CBC - The Fifth Estate - The Unofficial Story - Pt 1-5'
Channel: News
Tags: cbc the fifth estate unofficial story 9/11 truth ae911truth news canada canadian al-qaida 11 september 2001 terror new york osama bin laden bush biden cheney false flag inside job conspiracy theory iraq afghanistan niels harrit jones controlled demolition nano thermite dust wtc patriot act david ray griffin war peace steeper33
cbc the fifth estate unofficial story 9/11 truth ae911truth news canada canadian al-qaida 11 september 2001 terror new york osama bin laden bush biden cheney false flag inside job conspiracy theory iraq afghanistan niels harrit jones controlled demolition nano thermite dust wtc patriot act david ray griffin war peace steeper33
Youtube Comments: 424
99Eternal Says:
Aug 24, 2011 - @flyzerogravy Exactly, the point being what you do for a living. You defend murderers, and brag about it.Are you proud of that? Must be a fun life.You think they have a seat reserved for you when SHTF?Enjoy ;)
flyzerogravy Says:
Aug 24, 2011 - @Krackonis debate what? 9/11??9/11 is nothing more then a fallacy, the argument of just because 3 buildings collapsed means oh my, lions and tigers and bears oh my it's like Pensacola.[ got snow in 1892, 3 times... oh my THREE TIMES IN THE SAME YEAR!!! Them their Joosh musta knew Boosh's great great great great great gand daddy and had them pull that one off too!! umm... or was it "pull it"?
flyzerogravy Says:
Aug 24, 2011 - @99Eternal hahahaha yes, FUN Here what is Fun, when I get to smack you down like fly.You Blindly accuse me of Supporting some so called 'Murders' That You can not even name, but I cant support anything that don't exist and the reason they don't exist, is because in 10 years, YOU Still don't know who they are. hahahahahahahaha
99Eternal Says:
Aug 25, 2011 - @flyzerogravy "but I cant support anything that don't exist and the reason they don't exist, is because in 10 years, YOU Still don't know who they are. hahahahahahahaha"So they don't exist, yet I "still" don't know who they are?Way to expose yourself. You are unbelievably stupid.Smack me down like a fly? That's easy to say through a monitor hundreds of miles away from me isn't it? I'm waiting....hmm still nothing...wonder why....rofl.Inbred shill.
99Eternal Says:
Aug 25, 2011 - @flyzerogravy Uh, sorry but the fact that AE911TRUTh deletes your comments that contain profanity and absolutely no factual/relevant information has nothing to do with what happened on 9/11.Keep telling yourself that.
99Eternal Says:
Aug 25, 2011 - @flyzerogravy Several men who were video taping the attacks and cheering, told the police/feds who arrested them that they were Mossad agents sent to record the attacks.That information comes directly from the government...Clearly Israel had no involvement...Your life trolling 9/11 videos must be highly enjoyable ;)
Seigu007 Says:
Aug 26, 2011 - @99Eternal You pathetic little child. People like you deserve to be destroyed with impunity. You and your whore of a mother.
99Eternal Says:
Aug 26, 2011 - @Seigu007 Sorry, but your elementary schoolyard language does not effect me, nor does it have any relevance to 9/11.In fact, it is also quite counter-productive to your purpose, because you are only demonstrating how immature and uneducated you are, incapable of even presenting an argument. Absolutely pathetic..
Seigu007 Says:
Aug 26, 2011 - @99Eternal Convieniently distorting the facts, and omitting relevant information makes you a model idiot. So kudos for helping me prove my point. The argument is over, because youve degenerated into pointlessness.Now be a good howler monkey and climb back into your tree. Moron.
Seigu007 Says:
Sep 1, 2011 - @99Eternal Ah, I apologize. I should not have even replied to your initial outrageous ahistorical comment as it's clear that you lack the basic faculties of reason and logic to carry on an intelligent debate. People like you represent the idiocy of today.
99Eternal Says:
Sep 1, 2011 - @Seigu007 Does anyone hear crying? Sounds like a baby...Why are you talking to me? Your opening response being : "You pathetic little child. People like you deserve to be destroyed with impunity. You and your whore of a mother."I refuse to take part in your personal attacks.Does it bother you that I am above your profanity? Does it bother you that you lack the intelligence to even begin a factual debate with me?Troll on, pathetic shill.
megamogx Says:
Sep 8, 2011 - /watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o/watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k/watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI/watch?v=WxqoChniKVU/watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4/watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY/watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE/watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ/watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA
699backstab Says:
Sep 30, 2011 - Intelligent atheist Humans KNOW that 9/11 was not as its laid out by the American government. It cant be unless it happened on a different planet or even universe with a different set of laws of nature. Flag wrapped over patriotic religious Americans will have a difficult time looking at facts. Those of us without all that heinous baggage see crystal clear what happened. Don't know who did it but it wasn't desert wanderers with box cutter. LOL Americans will believe anything XD
roquefortfiles Says:
Oct 18, 2011 - @99Eternal Ok. the impact of the 767 is already over the building design limits. Les Robertson said so. Its fact. We are already over and above what it is designed for from the impact alone. Now ignite a fire on steel stripped bare of fire proofing and severely compromised to begin with. I'll let you add up the rest. Its pretty simple though.
99Eternal Says:
Oct 19, 2011 - @roquefortfiles ROFL! 7 months later?? It took you SEVEN MONTHS to come up with that lie?Of course they didn't design it for a 767, these planes didn't exist at the time the towers were built. They were built to withstand 707 impacts, which, if you were capable of researching, you'd know 707's have more impact energy than 767's.Furthermore, plane impacts are irrelevant in the case of WTC7, it was not hit....you idiot..
99Eternal Says:
Oct 19, 2011 - @roquefortfiles Your claim that the ensuing fires weren't considered is a blatant lie:In 1993, John Skilling, lead structural engineer for the WTC, recalled doing the analysis, and remarked, "Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed," he said. "The building structure would still be there."Quoted from Wikipedia...you incompetent shill.
roquefortfiles Says:
Oct 19, 2011 - @99Eternal Your claim that the ensuing fires weren't considered is a blatant lie:Take it up with Les Robertson. He's the one who said... "The fuel load was not taken in to consideration...in fact i don't know how it could be"..Why? Because computer models did not exist back in 1968 to calculate such a floating point random calculation. And no 707 factored in to the design would be crashing with a full fuel load anyway. Jets have to dump full fuel tanks to land.
99Eternal Says:
Oct 20, 2011 - @roquefortfiles You edited Les's quote...he said AS FAR AS HE IS AWARE. HIS CO-WORKER SAYS OTHERWISE:In 1993, John Skilling, lead structural engineer for the WTC, recalled doing the analysis, and remarked, "Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed," he said. "The building structure would still be there."
99Eternal Says:
Oct 20, 2011 - @roquefortfiles You edited Les's quote...he said AS FAR AS HE IS AWARE.HIS CO-WORKER SAYS OTHERWISE:In 1993, John Skilling, lead structural engineer for the WTC, recalled doing the analysis, and remarked, "Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed," he said. "The building structure would still be there."
Krackonis Says:
Nov 14, 2011 - @flyzerogravy Sir, 9/11 did occur, 3000 were murdered. Two planes knocked down 3 buildings using a fuel than I can burn in my stove and (amazingly enough) my stove will not melt. I'm afraid physics is not on your side here. If your comfortable view of the world is being challenged, you should go to another video. Perhaps one about cats or puppies?
Krackonis Says:
Nov 14, 2011 - @roquefortfiles You do not understand that the bottom of those beams (hundreds of them) were larger around than your house and filled with concrete. It could be filled with fuel and lit and we could lean up against it and the thermal transfer might make it warm... You have no concept of the size of this structure, not how hard it would be to "burn through" all those beams simultaneously, (from a fire 80 stories in the air.)
Krackonis Says:
Nov 14, 2011 - @roquefortfiles Actually, for a person to "troll" a site attempting to discredit by nefarious means and ad homenim attacks is why you are referred to as a shill. It's likely you are being paid for your posts by a "Cointelpro" operation. Just so you know why you are being referred to as a "shill"
roquefortfiles Says:
Nov 14, 2011 - @Krackonis LOL. Dude if you think the Government pays people to sit in coffee shops sipping a latte and attempting to discredit this brain addled nonsense you fucking twits post? You need to call up your nearest mental health professional. Its called Paranoia. Pathetic!!
Krackonis Says:
Aug 24, 2011 - @flyzerogravy Put forward your questions to me.. I'll gladly answer them, since I can debate and am well versed in the subject. Be warned I do not accept Ad Hominem attacks or other logically fallacies. I will explain to you what i can, however.