If you like the video, share it with your friends on these social sites:

 

Title: CBC - The Fifth Estate - The Unofficial Story - Pt 1-5

Added: Nov 28, 2009

Author: Steeper33

Duration: 9:48

Description:
JOIN The Discussion at: http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/discussion/2009/11/the_unofficial_story.html#comments On September 11, 2001 the world watched in shock and disbelief as planes flew in to New Yorks World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington, and Americans realized they were under attack. But by whom? What really happened? In The Unofficial Story, the fifth estates Bob McKeown introduces us to people who believe the real force behind the attacks was not Osama Bin Laden, but the U.S. government itself. Emerging from the dust and debris that day was a movement, known these days as 9/11 Truth or truthers people who believe that 9/11 was part of a vast conspiracy and cover-up by a criminal faction within the U.S. government. As the fifth estate reports, public opinion polls now show that the majority of Americans believe the Bush Administration had advance knowledge of those attacks and somehow allowed them to happen and that one-third of Canadians share the same belief. In The Unofficial Story, Bob McKeown explores why these questions and theories are growing in popularity. Youll meet some of the leading proponents of truther theories: Richard Gage, an American architect, explains how the WTC twin towers and the lesser known Tower #7 could only have crumbled as they did due to explosive charges placed inside the buildings. Others, including Canadian professor Kee Dewdney, insist that the story of the brave fight by the passengers of United Airlines Flight 93 must have been a hoax. But, youll also hear from others who dispel truther theories and try to understand why, from JFKs assassination to the moon landing to 9/11, a culture of conspiracy springs up around certain historic events. Despite the difference of opinion between those who blame the hijackers and those who blame their own government, the real importance of the fight over 9/11 truth is that it may have less to do with the past than the future. Full Length and Interviews Here: http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/ Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth http://www.ae911truth.org/ NYC Coalition For Accountability Now http://nyccan.org/index.php Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, Daniel Sunjata, Barrie Zwicker. 9/11 Truth Now Full Credit to SaveOurSovereignty3, Please Subscribe: http://www.youtube.com/user/SaveOurSovereignty3

Channel: News

CBC - The Fifth Estate - The Unofficial Story - Pt 1-5

Tags: cbc  the  fifth  estate  unofficial  story  9/11  truth  ae911truth  news  canada  canadian  al-qaida  11  september  2001  terror  new  york  osama  bin  laden  bush  biden  cheney  false  flag  inside  job  conspiracy  theory  iraq  afghanistan  niels  harrit  jones  controlled  demolition  nano  thermite  dust  wtc  patriot  act  david  ray  griffin  war  peace  steeper33 



CBC - The Fifth Estate - The Unofficial Story - Pt 1-5

cbc  the  fifth  estate  unofficial  story  9/11  truth  ae911truth  news  canada  canadian  al-qaida  11  september  2001  terror  new  york  osama  bin  laden  bush  biden  cheney  false  flag  inside  job  conspiracy  theory  iraq  afghanistan  niels  harrit  jones  controlled  demolition  nano  thermite  dust  wtc  patriot  act  david  ray  griffin  war  peace  steeper33 

Youtube Comments: 242

madebutante Says:

Mar 22, 2010 - Justice Now! ProsecuteBushCheney(dot)org

latenitepubs Says:

Apr 19, 2010 - american media is very good at drawing curtains over the truth.

pspboy7 Says:

May 5, 2010 - The Pentagon was definitely an inside job, that much is certain. I mean, a plane hit the Pentagon, where was the wreakage? And why was the hole in the side of the building, so small compared the the size of the craft that apparently hit it? The WTC towers, yeah ok I'll give you that, but the Pentagon? Yeah, right!

DianeDi Says:

May 19, 2010 - I saw this when it first aired. I was in shock that the CBC had the balls to air this. Thank U Canada & the CBC, which is government owned & mainly funded by the taxpayers. Too bad U.S. news media won't run with this one - but why would they? I've met far too many U.S. citizens that R in such denial over this. May I suggest they start with a couple of 911 truth documentary videos-those that have NEVER & will never be aired on mainstream. I urge people to turn the remote to the OFF position.

The911watch Says:

Jun 7, 2010 - 9-11 was definitly an inside job

maybetuesday1790 Says:

Jun 29, 2010 - You'd have to involve 100s of people to believe that the US Gov had anything to do with it. The majority of Americans believe that the Bush Admin knew or something to do with it? We do? Maybe the mentally retarded ones. What a crock.Canadians are so fucking stupid.That's why they will never have the clout that Americans..even at their worst...will ever have.You are so fucking stupid.

lealand25 Says:

Jul 17, 2010 - I cannot believe that architect could get on national tv and spread such misinformation on his own profession to a world of sheep hungry for a buffet of conspiracy hay. Those buildings fell because they where structually compromised from a very hot fire. Fire is how we make steel . When you heat steel to very hot temperatures it becomes molten or liquid and has no further rigidity thus making it impossible to carry the weight of the structure above it. Mass X Volacity and here endith the lesson!

da2nox Says:

Jul 20, 2010 - @lealand25 I am a welder and you are full of misinformation,have you ever worked with steel?

da2nox Says:

Jul 20, 2010 - Shock and awe certainly worked, made us believe what we knew was not true.

Thetan1974 Says:

Jul 20, 2010 - @lealand25 Hmmm... it's funny, because the NIST Report is 15,000 pages of a fire HYPOTHESIS - not the final explaination of what made the towers collapse. They even changed their hypothesis about what caused it a couple of times. And its signed by Bush on the "splash page" that NIST cannot be held accountable for THE explaination. But you just did it in 11 lines? Wow. What do we need NIST for?

lealand25 Says:

Jul 27, 2010 - I am a welder myself. I own a trucking company and we stretch or extend the frames on large comercial highway trucks all the time. The first thing the manufacturer makes sure it does is to add warning stickers to the frames of the trucks NOT to heat or weld the frames to ensure you don't remove the temper in the steel and compromise its strength. If you are a welder da2nox you have to know that. And steel becomes flexable before it becomes liquid when heated. Here endith the lesson !

lealand25 Says:

Jul 28, 2010 - Good God. Look jet fuel burns at 4500 degrees F . The steel in those buildings was made at 2500 degrees F. This is very simple math and physics at work here. Although the north tower was hit first and fell last is very easy to understand. North tower was hit higher up on the floors hence less weight above the fire so it took longer to compromise the structure but in the end the fire did what fire does. S T was hit last but the structure was carrying more weight above the fire so it fell first.

lealand25 Says:

Jul 28, 2010 - @Thetan1974 If the NIST don't understand simple physics then you should close them down. They are only helping to misguide a multitude of uneducated souls who would believe the sky was falling if a chicken told them it was.

Thetan1974 Says:

Jul 28, 2010 - @lealand25 Absolutely; NIST should be closed down or get scrutinized together with the whole congress. Throw out those inhumane gangster NeoCons who profits on lies and false flag "terror" and even have the power to withheld crusial evidence in "investigations" that never become real police matter.

MiaRyanne Says:

Jul 28, 2010 - @lealand25 Jet fuel DOES NOT burn @ 4500 degrees...nowhere near that. You should check your facts before stating them as such. What about the 90% of the steel that wasn't touched by flames or an airplane? Did that steel just move out of the way? Research is not a Bad Word.

lealand25 Says:

Jul 29, 2010 - @MiaRyan I'm sorry you and thousands of your conspirator loving friends don't understand basic engineering and physics. The emotional toll this kind of public misdirection induces on the surviving families of the men and women killed in those buildings is inexcusable. It is nothing less then a cult following looking for justification to there lack of understanding and it looks like this guy could be the Charles Masson they been praying for. Keep up the good work !

MiaRyanne Says:

Jul 29, 2010 - @lealand25 It's actually millions and it's not a conspiracy. The conspiracy is the "official fairy tale".

lexicon008 Says:

Jul 31, 2010 - @lealand25 Thats why numerous physicists and engineers are saying that the official story is bull, because the know basic physics and engineering, something you obviously do not. Does a tree whos top has been burned in a fire instantly turn to sawdust when that top falls over? If you break your hip does the rest of your leg simply shatter? No because those other parts WERE NOT AFFECTED. You can't have a straight down collapse of a building unless EVERYTHING ELSE GETS OUT OF THE WAY.

lealand25 Says:

Aug 1, 2010 - I'm sorry you and obviously many like you are so very gullible. The very firm that designed and built the twin towers have admitted they did not anticipate OR design into the towers the ability to withstand a breach of the structure to this magnitude. Futhermore they couldn't conceive the thought that the towers would have over 100,000 lbs of jet fuel each left to burn out of control for over 1.5 hrs. Titanic was a great design to, but then enters an iceburg ! OOPS didn't see that one did we ?

MiaRyanne Says:

Aug 2, 2010 - @lealand25 So, that giant fireball we saw was caused by what? Pretty obvious it was Jet fuel...and you believe Jet fuel burned for an hour and a half after that...you gotta admit that's a little bit funny. The builders of the WTC towers did account for it being hit by a boeing 707 back in the day. It's not like builders of tall building don't have to consider air-traffic...get a grip.

MiaRyanne Says:

Aug 2, 2010 - @lealand25 Also, I don't know how they (engineers) could account for an aircraft (like they did) and not believe it would also contain fuel. Airplanes tend to require fuel to strike buildings. I guess I missed the part where the Titanic completely imploded into intself upon striking the iceburg.

lealand25 Says:

Aug 11, 2010 - MiaRyanne Your living proof that theres a sucker born every day, and he"s living proof anyone can sell bullshit you just have to wrap it up in the right package. Don't worry though I dought he will ever laugh out loud at you, but he will laugh all the way to the bank. You have to admire him for that.

MiaRyanne Says:

Aug 17, 2010 - @lealand25 The sucker born every minute is the one that believe's the "official fairytale" is based on anything other than fallacy. I stand by what I've said and you can remember I said it when you find out the truth too. Do your research and then get back to me. Not just casual research, go indepth and cover every angle from both perspectives. I doubt you will feel the same in your heart when you've dont that.

admiralct Says:

Aug 27, 2010 - truthers deserve a swift kick in the balls for implying that the US bombed themselves. whats so hard to believe about terrorism?

justice1981denied Says:

Aug 28, 2010 - good one

CBC - The Fifth Estate - The Unofficial Story - Pt 1-5

| Privacy Policy