Ron Brookman, S E -- Structural Engineer

IndivisiblePrinciple Says:

May 24, 2011 - delusional? Like being satisfied that you've "debunked" thousands of years of scientifically verifiable and consistant laws of physics. To even try to claim that the manner of collapse of those building doesn't warrant all the questions that these people have raised debases your status as legitimate thinking individual. Without being prepared to be impartial no one can deal with trying comprehend truth. This fact has divided the decadent from the scientists throughout history.

GeorgiaTheJungle Says:

May 24, 2011 - that's a lie, why do you people allow each other to repeat these lies all the time? 911 myths has a page on recycled steel that refutes this hysterical lie. Gawd you people are desperate.

ae911truth Says:

May 24, 2011 - We didn't delete you. I don't know why tho since you don't contribute anything to the civil, intelligent, scientific discussion we prefer.

IndivisiblePrinciple Says:

May 24, 2011 - like when David Chandler questioned Syam Sunder and he had to eat his words concerning the immensly important point he was trying to throw a smoke screen over. The fact that there was some 100 odd feet of freefall which was being conviently distorted by averaging the total time of the fall of building 7 - this is the impartial investigation you are referring to? Yeah yeah qualified officials etc etc.Pathetic.

zapproowsdower Says:

May 25, 2011 - You're just embarrassing yourself kid. Go run back to your JREF forums - maybe if you try a bit harder, you can refute the theory of gravity too.

zapproowsdower Says:

May 25, 2011 - When it comes to trolls, just mark their comments as spam. Look at the style - insult, after insult, after insult, after insult. Endless paragraphs of insults. The entire comments section gets flooded with it. When they don't stop, you have to use the spam option. It was designed with people like Georgia in mind.

IndivisiblePrinciple Says:

May 25, 2011 - Nothing about his logic is embarrassing. The demonstration was simplistic because he justifiably believed that the logic was so easily comprehendible that all sane and honest people would grasp it by a mere symbolic representation. And he was right. The fact that people attack the simplicity of an obviously simple demonstration and then cheer, high five, and pat themselves on the back -- as opposed to the address the reasoning of the argument, speaks a great deal about them.

ae911truth Says:

May 25, 2011 - George I changed my mind. BYE BYE

slauzon11 Says:

May 27, 2011 - Queef.

DanUuNoel Says:

May 27, 2011 - It is so refreshing to have an engineer speak of the WTC disaster. People of average intelligence can recognize the triple demolitions, but since just about every watchdog (liberals, peace leaders, human/civil rights groups, unions, socialists, Muslims, etc.) has not, (s)he is puzzled. If Brookman and his colleagues tell the truth, then what about Greenpeace? Or Amnesty International? or the pope? Would they all be terribly dumb? Or hypocritical?9/11's questions are terrifying.Love,

GruesomeTruth Says:

May 29, 2011 - Each of these 'experts-speaking-out' is Fantastic.Whichever mainstream media first picks up on this & reports fairly--will be breaking the biggest story any genuine investigative reporter/news agency could hope for.Thank you, Mr. Brookman, for your diligence and courage.

wivi61 Says:

Jun 1, 2011 - Thank you! So clear spoken, so factual. Just the man we need!

Funkadelic2 Says:

Jun 3, 2011 - Folks, it IS important that you show your sympathy with those seeking a new investigation, but it is important too, to really sign the petitions actually demanding a new, real, IMPARTIAL investigation:w w w 2.ae911truth. org/signpetition. p h pThank you.

OperationMockingbird Says:

Jun 4, 2011 - JREF'ers are pseudo skeptics. Nothing more.

OperationMockingbird Says:

Jun 4, 2011 - Canada attacked us on 9/11 during Global Guardian '01. Funny thing is I see on your profile, it says you're from Canada. Strange coincidence?

cappucinokid100 Says:

Jun 12, 2011 - Richard Gage (AE911Truth) Talk @ Cambridge University UK 18th June 2011 (ALL WELCOME) See the featured video on my channel for full details.

sananda2012 Says:

Jun 15, 2011 - The irony of NIST's concern for public safety is that in a more thorough investigation of the "collapses" we would find the technology already used to nullify all the brilliant engineering of skyscrapers. The public safety was breached and only the brightest,most nefarious minds on Earth could have figured out how to achieve it , make it seem like an attack from "jihad", profit beyond avarice and wallow freely in pride for a decade. As America wakes up that pride will be bitter poison.

no2globalism Says:

Sep 6, 2011 - Thank you sir for speaking up for those of us that don't have a voice.

jborean Says:

Sep 7, 2011 - I hope I never walk into any of the buildings that this guy designed

colbs237 Says:

Nov 17, 2011 - Why would you say that? I worked with Ron and he is a terrific structural engineer and is very professional.

colbs237 Says:

Nov 17, 2011 - Great post :) I worked with Ron for 4 years, and I am so proud of him for stepping forward. He is a terrific structural engineer and very methodical and professional.

colbs237 Says:

Nov 17, 2011 - You are exactly right. I worked with Ron for 4 years and I knew that he was taking this extremely seriously. I am so proud of him for stepping forward.

colbs237 Says:

Nov 18, 2011 - I appreciate you so much Ron -- and I am so proud of your courage and determination. Thank you!Colby

a35intheShade Says:

Feb 12, 2012 - Thank you ae911truth for all that you've done and thank you ron brookman for your courage. I am about to graduate with a ba in civil engineering (emphasis on structures), then i will began my quest for my PE license. after i get that i will sign the ae911truth petition as a PE. it is insane that anyone can watch building 7 fall and think that all the columns failed simultaneously due to fire. why didn't that happen to buildings 3-7?

paingainmayn Says:

Mar 20, 2012 - If the failure of one column like how nist is claiming can bring down a building then terrorists the world over would be bringing down buildings. It's just nonsense. If these buildings where that vulnerable to fire that the whole building could just pancake then nobody would ever build them. And we sure as shit would have a lot more incidents the world over of this happening other than the miracle that happened with building 7.