WTC Thermite?

ChuffChuffWoo Says:

Sep 6, 2011 - Looks like shorting electrical cables to me... Electrical cables either use insulated copper or aluminium as the conductors inside a steel outer braid as a protective armour then a final layer of insulation. Google 'Aluminum Steel Cable' and you will see planty of stuff on steel amd aluminum combined in high power electrical cables.

MrRedeyedJedi Says:

Sep 8, 2011 - Ok, like... first off the music is a little bit inapropriate considering this is footage of nearly 3000 people loosing their lives. The point I'd like to make is that thermite alone wouldn't have been capible of melting through the vertical steel collums supporting the towers. I do, however think different grade of thermite that burns exceptionally hotter was used near the top just below the collision on all sides to premote a perfect implosion of each tower.

MrRedeyedJedi Says:

Sep 8, 2011 - Ok, like... first off the music is a little bit inapropriate considering this is footage of nearly 3000 people loosing their lives. The point I'd like to make is that thermite alone wouldn't have been capible of melting through the vertical steel collums supporting the towers. I do, however think different grade of thermite that burns exceptionally hotter was used near the top just below the collision on all sides to premote a perfect implosion of each tower.

MrRedeyedJedi Says:

Sep 8, 2011 - perposterous. I'm all for believing that a special type of thermite was used but your proposal that thermite was carried on the underbelly of the aircraft is rediculous, sorry.. but if the plane hit the building with thermite it would be dispersed and thus would render it completetly ineffective to the steel collums during the explosion of the aircraft. Even if it was to ignite it would be a random guess as to where it ignited and if it was still all in one piece.

MrRedeyedJedi Says:

Sep 8, 2011 - Those buildings were designed to withstand aircraft hits and I'm sorry but jet fuel alone burns no where near at a sufficient enough temperature to heat those collosal steel collums to a point where they soffen so much they coincidently buckle in on their selves and collapse down perfectly on themselves. I understand some people will believe what they want to to make things seem more interesting but the facts in this instance just defy psyics and I just can't abandon science.

MrRedeyedJedi Says:

Sep 8, 2011 - Those buildings were designed to withstand aircraft hits and I'm sorry but jet fuel alone burns no where near at a sufficient enough temperature to heat those collosal steel collums to a point where they soffen so much they coincidently buckle in on their selves and collapse down perfectly on themselves. I understand some people will believe what they want to to make things seem more interesting but the facts in this instance just defy psyics and I just can't abandon science.

sam49789 Says:

Sep 10, 2011 - i understand that every one has the right to free speach .. well this is america but i watched the south towers outer edge beam fall in an its self many times and i just dont see this beeing an inside job.. iv watched the vid on 911 truth hundreds of times and im sorry but i just think that people are looking to deep into some thing that isent there... its in ower human nature to point the finger when somethings goes wrong wether it be at the goverment or a surten religon ...

sam49789 Says:

Sep 10, 2011 - and to correct TIMOTHYRAYMOND1 iv studied the twin towers since the attakes and infact the towers were disined to implowed in on themselfs when structure failer would happen.. what people thought was controlled det was acculy what the buildings were made to do, and the twin towers were not made to take a hit from an airline maybe an extremly small plane, BUT not at all the size or speed that the planes were traviling at.

sam49789 Says:

Sep 11, 2011 - and if u watch the collaps of the north tower you can see at the end of the collaps a lage part of the building still up in the air after ferther reveiw of this video, what you see are some of the support collems of the building.. witch in my opinon completly desolves the thory of thermite in the buildings

sam49789 Says:

Sep 11, 2011 - and to prove that this was an attake was the most un looked and most basic info .. look at were that plans hit , on the north tower the plane hit from 95 to 102 and on the south from 76 and 78 this is just simple to think about , the south tower was hit second and fell first why well abviose more weight and mass on weak beams and when it hit the south tower the plane took out the right side of the building and from eye witness reports the building began to tilt untill it collapsed

sam49789 Says:

Sep 11, 2011 - and if you watch the collapse of the south tower you can see the building from 76 and up fall to the right completly and fall in on its self and the puffs of dust from the floors was just a reaction of air rushing through the building ... when the tower collapsed the was a massive down draft  in the building .. breaking windows and expelling papers and office supplyes through the windows and the bangs people were hearing were the floors falling recordeon style like it was built to do

sam49789 Says:

Sep 11, 2011 - and this will be my last post the north tower .. there is not much to say but in my opinon if god would have let that tower stay for one more hour they could have saved thoughs people in the upper floors. the plane hit dead center of the upper floors .. not upstructing the outer beams to an extream stent and yess the middle beams were damedged horribly and eposed to the fire... witch after time could no longer hold the weight .. that is what i beleive and iv tested it useing a rail road trak

sam49789 Says:

Sep 11, 2011 - and deisle fuel all though not as high burning the trak did sufer strucher failer and bent when weight was added witch proves that that was the cause of the collapse of the north tower heat weight and time that was all it took. may all who died rest in peace and may any who reads my posts think that it is an opinion and theses are the facts iv gatherd... have a good day R.I.P

OmniDarkness Says:

Sep 11, 2011 - Wow, I really cannot determine if sam49789's comments are troll or not. If so, troll harder sir. If not, I ask, how can one be so grammatically inept and still manage to operate a computer?

ejradiotalk Says:

Sep 12, 2011 - There is nothing wrong with asking questions. What makes people so sure that someone in their own country wouln't be a criminal. If it happens it other countries, it sure can happen here also.

fluffatronix Says:

Sep 13, 2011 - Thermate-TH3 is more likely it burns hotter & you need a lot less 2 get the job done!It's been around since 1940.

fluffatronix Says:

Sep 13, 2011 - Look here watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g

FirstUsedBooks Says:

Oct 26, 2011 - Re Molten metal at corner: if you look at the vid taken from the Marriott at the 19:53 mark, the corner molten metal looks silvery and could be aluminum. ww w.youtube.co m/watch?v=kZi4o2OBLEI&feature=related I don't think we can eliminate the idea of the cameras, or the sunlight, or reflection from the fires, as possible contributors to what we perceive as an orangery color.

chillaxer1993 Says:

Jan 23, 2012 - to bring down massive towers a lot of thermite would have been used and that much would have been detected by any person working in there. People think WTC 7 was blown up because of thermite but same reason people would have seen the thermite. WTC 7 might have been let to collapse because it was unsafe after the towers collapsed. there were fires that were only visible on the outside but you never see inside or the gashes the buildings suffered after being hit by the facade of WTC 1 and 2

ChaffyCougar Says:

Jan 30, 2012 - The collapse was not because of the plane but because there was thermite and explosions set up in the building. The gouverment knew

HedgieDiva Says:

Apr 7, 2012 - No explosions it was appliances in the building if anything. I know firefighters who were at the scene and in the buildings.

ctcole77 Says:

May 8, 2012 - Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific ConsultantsWTC Dust Study2/28/2012"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments.""There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

hfjdkhjhvc Says:

May 23, 2012 - it could not have possibly been thermite. it is a proven fact that thermite can not burn through steel unless an outragious amount was used(which would have been clearly noticed by everyone) and thermite is a very quick burn and only takes seconds. it took about an hour for the steel to weaken and fall. and also chaffycougar learn how to spell GOVERNMENT

hfjdkhjhvc Says:

May 23, 2012 - thermite is the stuff at the end of sparklers. it doesnt explode, it burns