|
|
|
|
Title: Theory of Ghostplane
Added: Jul 25, 2008
Author: CollinAlexander
Duration: 5:7
Description:
http://psy-opera.com "9/11 - The Great American Psy-Opera" is the Ultimate 9/11 Truth movie, and it has begun.http://twitter.com/#!/psyoperaNew - $100,000 Amateur Video Challenge.http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2009/04/100000-amateur-video-challenge.htmlFor a scholarly treatise on the 9/11 video compositing, please visit:http://911composites.wiki-site.com/A demonstration of the compositing techniques used in the CNN "airplane" footage, and the other non-live shots. Here's my blog entry:http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2008/07/theory-of-edited-non-live-911-airplane.htmlFor the theory of the live shots, please see:http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2008/05/theory-of-live-911-airplane-composites.htmlNo-Plane Theory FAQQ. How does this video prove there were no planes?A. It doesn't. This is merely a demonstration of the technique. For the proof, please see "9/11 Airplane Video Composites", linked above. Q. What about all the (hundreds, thousands, millions) of eyewitnesses?A. If a real plane flew into the South Tower, there would indeed be thousands, if not 10's of thousands of eyewitnesses. But there are astonishingly few people who actually claimed to have seen and heard a plane. The extreme LACK of eyewitnesses speaks in favor of no planes. There are a number of eyewitnesses, like David Handschuh, who were looking at the tower, and swear they didn't see a plane. The few eyewitnesses that do exist are either (a) lying or (b) mistaken. The govern-media has trillions of dollars, and a hundred thousand secret agents. Manufacturing "eyewitnesses" is no problem. And let's not discount false memory. Many studies have conclusively shown that fake video alters eyewitness accounts.Q. Wouldn't it have been easier to just use real airplanes?A. No. There are insurmountable problems with that. A real plane would mostly explode against the side of the much stronger building, they needed the plane to appear to completely penetrate. A real plane might miss the target. A real plane would leave real evidence, and it would be the wrong evidence, which might be seen by the wrong people. A fake plane leaves no evidence, unless you make a mistake, such as allowing the nose of the airplane to pop out the back of a layer mask (see Chopper 5). Q. What happened to the passengers and airplanes?A. The real planes took off as advertised, and were hijacked by special ops. The planes were landed at Stewart Air Force Base, and replaced on radar by false blips. The passengers and crew were executed, blood and body samples taken. These samples were then planted at the "crash" locations, "found", and then legitimate DNA testing was done. Q. But I saw an airplane crashing into the tower on live TV!A. No you didn't. On live TV, you were shown "Chopper 5" and "Chopper 7". Both of these video show a plane passing behind the edge of the tower, not hitting it. The videos that show the plane penetrating the building came later, after there was plenty of time to edit them. They look fake, because they are fake. Q. How could they create a fake airplane from so many different angles, and have them all match?A. Easy. First a 3D model of a single plane flight is modeled in a program like Lightwave or Maya. That flightpath can then be rendered from any virtual camera position. Q. What about the airplane parts that were found on the street?A. No parts were found BELOW the "impact" area, or in the gashes. The few parts that were found, were located BEYOND the tower, as if they made it all the way through and out the other side. I believe they shot an airplane part out of a cannon on the 80th floor of WTC2. That's what it looks like on the video. This would explain why the molten metal was seen pouring out of that location before the demolition. They had to melt down the cannon, lest it be blown clear during the demolition. Q. What about the phone calls?A. What phone calls? The only recording of any phone call is Betty Ong, early in AA11. That probably was a real phone call, after the real hijackers had taken over the plane, and before they landed it at Stewart AFB. As to the rest of the alleged phone calls, they don't exist. A "transcript" means nothing. What phone calls?Q. If there was no plane crash, then what hit the WTC?A. Nothing. It exploded from within. Q. What program did you use to create this, and was that available in 2001? A. I did this in Apple Motion. Various programs like Adobe After Effects have the same and better features, and have been available since the late 1990's. -Ace Baker
Related Videos:
Videos related to 'Theory of Ghostplane'
Channel: Tech
Tags: 9/11 9/11 truth no planes nuclear demolition psy-opera ace baker.
9/11 9/11 truth no planes nuclear demolition psy-opera ace baker.
Youtube Comments: 6518
airkooled05 Says:
May 25, 2012 - Please check out Dr Judy Wood and look at the video " Where did the Towers Go ? " It will tell you at least the how of this operation . It is evil and they have gotten away with it . The story will blow your mind
airkooled05 Says:
May 25, 2012 - My fellow Americans . People are waking up all over the USA . Please stay the course . Ignore all the name callers and haters . They are a distraction and do not waste your time .Educate your self and others . This is your nation . You bult it with your sweat and most of all your money . You have a right to the truth . Not some half baked story of Muslims with box cutters . You were toldwhat to believe on this dark day . Think for your self and take back your country Peace
Billy2011C Says:
May 25, 2012 - Sorry, had some spending to do. Unlike you, I have a life outside of the internet! Superman sends his regards. Ha ha.By the way, your still ridiculous, ha ha.
matako07 Says:
May 26, 2012 - I also have a life- but unlike you I can Manage That AND trash an idiotic troll like you in my leisure time. But, understand you're position.You've probably got 20 laptops going responding to message boards and youtube links all day long-desperating clinging to some bizarre alternate reality were buildings fall at free fall caused by scattered fires and 767's fly cruising speed at sea level without tearing themselves apart.
Billy2011C Says:
May 26, 2012 - Refers to the Amsterdam air crash.El Al Flight 1862. A Boeing 747 cargo plane that crashed into a high rise apartment complex. The building exploded into flames and collapsed. very, very similar to this actually. But without the deluded conspiracy theories. By the way, your still ridiculous, ha ha.
nistelX Says:
May 26, 2012 - yok artik ./ neye inancagimizi sasirdik aq
matako07 Says:
May 26, 2012 - I'm not sure why you'd lie about an incident that is easily referenced anywhere on the internet. The building still stands to this day with only the section that was impacted missing. In fact the FOUNDATION is STILL there at the impact zone of the crash. You silly billy. WHY LIE? Again, I realize this must be a tough JOB for you. Making up stories, twisting the facts and outright lying in the commission of denying Basic Physics - it must be exhausting managing all these message boards & links.
airkooled05 Says:
May 26, 2012 - This is a good film . Be sure and watch a the DOCTOR JUDY WOOD FILM " WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO " draw your own conclusions . Thanks . Peace
matako07 Says:
May 27, 2012 - Too bad the building in Germany didn't have a Giant Facade constructed from Massive Girders rigged together with huge girdles forming sections weighing hundreds of tons. Too bad the building in Germany didn't have "rivers of molten metal" burning for months After the collapse as many firemen who were THERE have testified to right here on youtube....otherwise you just might have a leg to stand on. you silly clown.
Billy2011C Says:
May 27, 2012 - Too bad the building was in Holland. This shows that you don't do proper research, you just listen to everybody else. "Rivers of molten metal"! Really? Rivers, flowing through Manhattan! Ha ha. Testified, right here on youtube! Ha ha. The Supreme Court of conspiracies! Ha ha. Your still ridiculous. Ha ha
TheJeffwayman Says:
May 27, 2012 - was thier this kind technology in 2001?
LuedeeCo Says:
May 27, 2012 - RON PAUL 2012
matako07 Says:
May 27, 2012 - If what happened in Germany was the same as 911 - the Entire building would not only be flattened-but it would fall into its own basement levels in a pile of shattered materials mixed with molten iron and burn for 3 months.But instead...the building STILL stands / most notably, the Foundation subfloors are STILL intact...to this day. Thanks for arguing the case for the 911truthers, you silly billy.
Billy2011C Says:
May 27, 2012 - Oh dear, you still insist it's Germany. Like I said in my last response, the building was in Amsterdam, Holland (Netherlands). And I said it was very similar. The whole section of buildings where the plane hit, the corner where the 2 met, (usually the strongest part) collapsed in a heap. The buildings are at least 200 meters long, that's 400 meters (1200ft) total length. Surely you don't expect the whole thing to be affected? Now your just being ridiculous again. Ha ha.
Kayaproducties Says:
May 27, 2012 - 2001 likes :D Lol
teefkay Says:
May 27, 2012 - This is brain-dead stupid.1. If someone were to have done this, it would have been immediately obvious to a video expert.2. 200+ other videos of this event show the same thing.3. Zero videos show anything else.A 767-222 cannot go 540mph in level flight, but it can EASILY go that speed IF:1. it's pulling out of a 10,000' dive (which UA175 was)2. you don't care about shortening the plane's service life (which they weren't)Just another pile o' Truther stupid.
Billy2011C Says:
May 28, 2012 - That's right!
TheMartieno Says:
May 28, 2012 - Great job you have proven you can animate stuff
gumball3D Says:
May 28, 2012 - Haha, this is not a "theory." It's sheer lunacy. I'd be embarrassed if I posted this on YT.
gumball3D Says:
May 28, 2012 - Well said
hammadoolass Says:
May 28, 2012 - Seems to me that both towers went down far too quickly ...... it should have taken much longer for them to collapse than it did. Something dodgey there !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
fitnessmaxi Says:
May 28, 2012 - What?! Andrew Kramer did 911?
RudyTorres63 Says:
May 28, 2012 - computer nerd!!!!
matako07 Says:
May 25, 2012 - a reply to a debunker troll on youtube=taking the troll seriously?More 911 Mysteries...Nice Try, CIA Troll."Gotta go", huh...you must be managing quite a few thousands links on the net.do you have software that gives you notifications on links to respond to?