|
|
|
|
Title: Thunderf00t DMCAed in William Lane Craigs Name
Added: Jan 24, 2012
Author: Thunderf00t
Duration: 5:28
Description:
If you find the abuse of the DMCA by drcraigvideos, who is purportedly acting on behalf of William Lane Craig, you may contact him through his website at http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/PageServer?pagename=contact_usDrcraigvideos claims multiple times that he owns the copyright and is acting on the behalf of both William Lane Craig and Reasonable Faith in the comments section here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtVf79DJg4Qdrcraigvideos has now filed a baseless DMCA against this video.The original video can be downloaded from this link:http://www.mediafire.com/?l8s3iliz2mjtbqpThe video of DPRJones can be downloaded from here:http://www.mediafire.com/?pimp63hs1ksd0b9
Related Videos:
Videos related to 'Thunderf00t DMCAed in William Lane Craigs Name'
Channel: Nonprofit
Tags: drcraigvideos false dmca copyright abuse william lane craig christian apologetics richard dawkins academic track record thunderf00t wlc midget laughable funny professional philosopher university debate comedy humour college joke fun laugh youtube account free speech theowarner andromedaswake
drcraigvideos false dmca copyright abuse william lane craig christian apologetics richard dawkins academic track record thunderf00t wlc midget laughable funny professional philosopher university debate comedy humour college joke fun laugh youtube account free speech theowarner andromedaswake
Youtube Comments: 3301
Jaws10214 Says:
May 27, 2012 - That's totally fine if you wish to simply voice your opinion, and move on.But you aren't. You are trolling Atheist videos attempting to prove us wrong, or convert some people. Or you are here because you don't fully believe your faith.Either way, You are trolling Atheists and trying (pathetically) to prove them wrong.Tell me, why should I believe your version of god?and you still haven't answered me as to why you are actually here, watching atheist videos, and verbally attacking people.
Jaws10214 Says:
May 27, 2012 - Answering a question with a question truly shows everyone your level of intellect.It also shows you're afraid of the question ;)Answer it honestly.Why are you here?
HKYSPP Says:
May 27, 2012 - No, that was 'ridicolous'. Dawkins did debate Craig. Craig now wants a rematch. Dawkins is busy and has already beaten him once, what more does he have to prove? He debates serious debaters, not fakes like Craig who specifically endorse genocide. Now Craig won't dare debate Thunderfoot. Blatant hypocrisy.
Jaws10214 Says:
May 27, 2012 - good, you can admit that religion is a tool to control the 'Stupid', can you admit that you are here because you a closet atheist?I've a suggestion for you, youtube theist, get used to seeing your religion bashed by smart people ;)tis the beginning of the end of religion for humans on earth. we do not need your indoctrinated hatred in our society. expunging it is the best way to get rid of morons such as yourself ;)
Jaws10214 Says:
May 27, 2012 - 'alcoholists' is not a word. Every religious person on this planet makes false claims of 'knowing' their god is real. just like you make false claims of being smart enough to understand the definition of words ;)
Jaws10214 Says:
May 27, 2012 - ScienceFoundation kicked your ass. You're just too stupid to understand that ;)
Jaws10214 Says:
May 27, 2012 - wow you're stupid.
Jaws10214 Says:
May 27, 2012 - you cannot answer questions can you.or is it because you are afraid of the answers you might find?you look desperate and scared of knowledge someday abolishing this hatred you call religion.Now answer my question.
MoonwalkerWorshiper Says:
May 27, 2012 - [Craig now wants a rematch. ]Craig doesn't set up debates, universities do.[Craig won't dare debate Thunderfoot]Craig doesn't even know who Thunderf00t is. And I don't think anybody have invited to debate. Thunderf00t prefers to attack Craig's status as philosopher rather than his arguments.
Andy Smith Says:
May 27, 2012 - @Jaws10214 No he didn't he has no idea what he's on about!
MoonwalkerWorshiper Says:
May 27, 2012 - [You are trolling Atheist videos attempting to prove us wrong, or convert some people.]"Trolling" is when somebody attacks people in a personal way, unprovoked. That's what you're doing to me. I haven't wanted your attention. If I look up your previous replies to me, they are provoking and demeaning and insulting yet you want to accuse me of being the troll simply because I'm a theist and you have decided I'm not allowed to be here. Are you for or against freedom of speech?
MoonwalkerWorshiper Says:
May 27, 2012 - I'll answer why I'm here until you answer me why you are here. I'm not obligated to provide you with any personal information until I decide it.[shows everyone your level of intellect.]Once again you're provoking me, trying to tell me I'm not intelligent. That's a personal attack, and that is trolling. Why are you here, attacking me and questioning me when I haven't provoked you in any way? Why are you calling me a troll when I don't "verbally attack" anyone as you did to me?
MoonwalkerWorshiper Says:
May 27, 2012 - [can you admit that you are here because you a closet atheist?]No but I can admit I'm here because I'm genuinely interested in challenging others beliefs and my own belief, while you are here because you are a trolling prick and you want to mirror that on people who are theists.[get used to seeing your religion bashed by smart people]Well it ain't coming from you. If you can't see the difference between a troll and a genuine person, you can't see difference between smart and stupid either.
Jaws10214 Says:
May 27, 2012 - intelligence evades you.. You are here verbally attacking other atheists who are merely spreading their knowledge amongst themselves. You think you are smart enough to disprove them, but you are not. instead you take the low road of instigating an argument instead of debate. You came here buddy. No one coerced you into watching this video, or any other atheist videos. You came here to try and debunk them. Not to add to the community. I am against your pathetic religion, Not the freedom of speech
MoonwalkerWorshiper Says:
May 27, 2012 - ["All things" was short for "All things that begin to exist"]You better tell me that. Don't make a strawman and call me retarded just because I can't read your mind."things which cannot govern their own existence" are limited things. I bind that to some things requiring causes.[SO DO IT ALREADY!]You still think I should give you a deductive version of the argument? Well... alright, if you apologize for your strawman and your insult.
MoonwalkerWorshiper Says:
May 27, 2012 - All you're doing is going around calling people stupid. That's what trolls do. They come to commen section and post replies with the sole intent of provoking and insult people.
Jaws10214 Says:
May 27, 2012 - like what you are doing here on an atheist video?yea, you just defined yourself my friend ;)
MoonwalkerWorshiper Says:
May 27, 2012 - [You are here verbally attacking other atheists]LOL no I'm not, open your eyes "buddy". What are you scared of?[You came here]Yeah, you did too. It's a public forum. It's meant to be used to discuss the topic. You aren't doing that. You're spending your writings to describe insulting opinions of people who have a different perspective than you, regarding the topic. It's jealousy. I don't need to "add to the community" by sharing your opinion on God or religion. Perhaps you need to grow up?
MoonwalkerWorshiper Says:
May 27, 2012 - By the way I asked you two days ago: [In what way are "limited things" the same thing as saying "all things"?]Look at page 4.Your reply was: [Did you just seriously ask me to explain how "Limited Things" (a term that you yourself chose to use in which to refer to the conclusion in question) is apart of the set of "ALL THINGS"]Your dishonesty is exposed.
DEdgeOfReason Says:
May 27, 2012 - "No but I can admit I'm here because I'm genuinely interested in challenging others beliefs and my own beliefs-"You certainly haven't risen to that challenge,in fact you've lowered yourself to insults & name calling when your beliefs have been challenged.Your beliefs don't challenge others;they're easily refuted:see most recent on deductive KCA. Despite best efforts of people like AtomicKinetic12, TheScienceFoundation and Orion3T you've refused to learn even when referred to scholarly sources.
MoonwalkerWorshiper Says:
May 27, 2012 - [you've lowered yourself to insults & name calling when your beliefs have been challenged]That's just a lie, coming from the guy who made up fictional quotes from Wikipedia. I expect nothing else than slander from the likes of you, Jaws and that other guy what's his name. You don't bring on-topical arguments, you bring personal trashtalk.Those people who faced me have all failed to build a valid case for their objections. As for you, you haven't even TRIED. Who are you to talk?
DEdgeOfReason Says:
May 28, 2012 - "That's just a lie, coming from the guy who made up fictional quotes from Wikipedia." Again, see "causality" under both physics and philosophy. But you seem satisfied NOT to learn. As for "on-topical arguments" look back on the weeks of your comments here, your easily refuted arguments consist of spamming logical fallacies, distortions, insults and accusations of lying until your opponents give up in annoyance. You're the pigeon who's crapping on the chessboard who thinks he's winning.
srexob715 Says:
May 28, 2012 - "Trolling" is when somebody attacks people in a personal way, unprovoked. "troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community.............which is exactly what you are doing. Or you are very dumb. I would prove its trolling to save face if I were you! LOL
srexob715 Says:
May 28, 2012 - So.............all trolls get exposed from now on.DUMB ASS TROLL! WHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH
AtomicKinetic12 Says:
May 27, 2012 - ..cont. "All things that begin to exist"... are obviously "things which cannot govern their own existence". This is your fucking point... if it isn't then you're arguing about something I didn't ask you to prove. You went off on your own tangent. Now you know why YOU should be the one forming the deductive argument. That way you can't make any bullshit strawmen accusations when it came directly from you. SO DO IT ALREADY!! Otherwise you're continuing to look rather imbecilic.