|
|
|
|
Title: 2nd Plane Hitting WTC - LIVE News Coverage - 9/11
Added: Jul 20, 2011
Author: BoulevardeTV
Duration: 8:54
Description:
This segment is comprised of a series of newscasts that feature the crash of Flight 175 into the South Tower as it happened LIVE at 9:03 AM. This segment documents and preserves how just about each and every network covered the moment the South Tower was struck on live television. This is an exert from the DVD - "September 11, 2001 - As It Happened - A Composite.
Related Videos:
Videos related to '2nd Plane Hitting WTC - LIVE News Coverage - 9/11'
Channel: News
Tags: world tower avi september elevator dubai twin towers building mall inside demolition 11th lift construction truth plane crash footage conspiracy collapse media 1st news 2nd entertainment place otis team hydraulic head events 3rd traction second pentagon first elevators buildings round defense time
world tower avi september elevator dubai twin towers building mall inside demolition 11th lift construction truth plane crash footage conspiracy collapse media 1st news 2nd entertainment place otis team hydraulic head events 3rd traction second pentagon first elevators buildings round defense time
Youtube Comments: 630
PanchoVanilla1 Says:
May 23, 2012 - Listen (listen = don't watch) to the words of the very last witness! he-he-he!!!! She says she saw it "live" (as if she was producing a film; requring there be a plane), that she saw it "miss, then hit it...", and there's even more - this is a compliation of relief for me! Commercial airline pilots have declared this "2nd plane" could not have even hit WTC2; if there was a second plane, but first - we need to obtain all that which has been distorted, hidden and kept secret from "U.S.".
1r101 Says:
May 23, 2012 - Haha is this supposed to be a joke? Come on give me a real answer. Why would they edit in planes?
blackhog42 Says:
May 23, 2012 - Because there were no planes...
cehamic1023 Says:
May 23, 2012 - lol troll
speedbump6992 Says:
May 25, 2012 - just read your comment; reporters in the 3rd definitly mentioned a plane, the 4th has no conceivable vantage point, there not in the direct line of sight of the impact of the plane , but you can clearly see it. that just distinguishes your claim. of course there gonna say explosion cause thats what they saw. pfffft rediculous
SirPlainview Says:
May 25, 2012 - chilling
bakerpd4 Says:
May 26, 2012 - Trust me idiots still do....
bakerpd4 Says:
May 26, 2012 - You are an idiot. Solid structural steel?? The only steel in the walls are rebar. Not to mention the jets engines, and landing gear are almost all steel. That engine is a giant cannon ball. And what do you mean trail of smoke? It didnt crash it was flown into the building. Why would there be a trail of smoke? Go back to class kid please.
blackhog42 Says:
May 26, 2012 - Umm, I never said anything about smoke... what are you talking about? You obviously don't know much about physics. The very tip of the hollow aluminum wing doesn't weigh shit, yet somehow managed to easily slice through steel and concrete like the rest of the "plane". It's physically impossible, it didn't happen, there were no planes. Please stop bothering me with your nonsense.
bakerpd4 Says:
May 26, 2012 - Where the fuck does it ever say the nose didnt get obliterated? You talking about that blurry piece that came out the other side? That coulda been any mangled piece of metal. The truth movement always has and always will be a joke.
goodwillie1 Says:
May 26, 2012 - Batgirl at 7:12 ?
dodo gegli Says:
May 27, 2012 - That kid is retarded. He think's he's a physicist on another video about mars. He fails so bad at trying to explain certain things in the video that have no valuable feedback or intel. Just shit he mashes with his fingers all in one sentence or paragraph. I mean, his english grammar is fucking terrible! That alone tells you the insignificance about his breed.
dodo gegli Says:
May 27, 2012 - LOL.. so you know what happened at the twin towers now? LMFAO... you have got to be the most retarded kid on youtube to go around claiming something that you have no proof of. You're just speculating from what you witnessed on video as well, fucking dumb ass!
dodo gegli Says:
May 27, 2012 - LOL.. you explaining physics huh. That's just fucking FUNNY as hell. Look how you just pile shit upon shit by other videos you comment and recollect them into another comment.
bakerpd4 Says:
May 27, 2012 - I gots a stalker.
dodo gegli Says:
May 27, 2012 - We got a retard on the loose!
bakerpd4 Says:
May 27, 2012 - If you have to go to someones channel just to find another topic to attempt to argue about I think its safe to say you lost.
dodo gegli Says:
May 27, 2012 - Oh yeah. How physics had nothing to do with your question. Brilliant win!
dodo gegli Says:
May 27, 2012 - LOL.. you explaining physics huh. That's just fucking FUNNY as hell. Look how you just pile shit upon shit by other videos you comment and recollect them into another comment.
bakerpd4 Says:
May 27, 2012 - How someone continues to argue about a joke... Happiness will stop that need to argue.
dodo gegli Says:
May 27, 2012 - Didn't seem like a joke. You were so dead serious about the topic, mr. physicist!
PanchoVanilla1 Says:
May 23, 2012 - All the reporters say the word "explosion"; no confirmation of airplanes except for those who suddeny step in and talk about a plane. 3rd "live" coverage never mentions a plane; nor does the 4th. "Explosions" Look at "overlay" in video creation, and how these explosions could - back then - be altered. Don't look at the footage! Listen to the reporters!