|
|
|
|
Title: New 9/11 photos 'prove WTC exploded from inside'
Added: Feb 11, 2010
Author: RussiaToday
Duration: 5:50
Description:
New picture releases are shedding light on September 11th, some say they prove that the assault on America proves a homegrown attack. The new photos are provided by US national institute of standards and technology. There are over 2,000 new photos that have been made public. Manny Badillo says that you see an explosion from the inside, not what it has seemed to be, he says there has never been a building taken down by a plane.
Related Videos:
Videos related to 'New 9/11 photos 'prove WTC exploded from inside''
Channel: News
Tags: manny badillo september 11 national institute of standards and technology photos conspiracy 2000 explosion plane rt russia today
manny badillo september 11 national institute of standards and technology photos conspiracy 2000 explosion plane rt russia today
Youtube Comments: 17259
billy7connor Says:
May 21, 2012 - My friend has a 1st degree in medicine - he's not an idiot :) please tell these facts that prove fire collapsed the tower :Dthere are quite a few facts that make people ask questions about the event - though i do agree there are many theories based on opinions :)
floydcz1 Says:
May 21, 2012 - @Tetrahedral you are wasting your time with 12weasel because he is infact a Weasel, self opionionated gobshite.
12weasel100 Says:
May 21, 2012 - medicine is not structural engineering However like most truthers you are probably fucking lying anyway and if you are not and your friend who is a doctor believes 911 was a huge conspiracy and WTC was controlled demo then I pray for the safety and lives of anyone that visits him The properties of steel, how steel reacts to heat, steel fame structures have collapsed before due to fire, design of WTC, inward bowing and twisting of columns etc etc are all facts. Where are your facts you have none
HellRehab Says:
May 22, 2012 - If everybody on Youtube who isn't qualified to talk about structural engineering and science would stop arguing about structural engineering and science it would be helpful. Debunkers are wasting their time.Real scientists have published peer-reviewed articles about the collapses. The vast majority of them leave no room for a controlled demolition.Who is this schmuck on RT and why is he even being interviewed?
Tetrahedral101 Says:
May 22, 2012 - So i did! 12weasel is a bigot!!
billy7connor Says:
May 22, 2012 - But how the steel in the WTCs reacted to the heat, how the steel structures collapsed in the WTCs - Nobody knows.Fact 1 - No plane hit WTC 7Fact 2 - WTC 7 was the furthest of the WTC buildings from the twin towersFact 3 - There were pools of molten metal at the base of the WTC after the collapseThey don't prove anything but they do make people ask questions about the government story :)
12weasel100 Says:
May 22, 2012 - Profession engineers and meturalogists know exactly how steel reacts when heated. They inspected the beams and trussesFact 1- WTC7 may not have been hit by a plane but it was hit but WTC1 or how would you logically explain the fires and damage. Magic??Fact 2- WTC7 was across the road about 350ft from WTC1 well within the range of WTC1(continued)
12weasel100 Says:
May 22, 2012 - (continued)Fact 3- there was plenty of soft metals that were in and around the towers that could have melted it is no suprise however it is an illogical statement to make. Logically explain how "pools of molten metals" is supposed to prove controlled demo when no controlled demo ever does this.So when asked to provide facts you spew out shit and illogical statements. You fail again you retard.
floydcz1 Says:
May 22, 2012 - After watching September Clues, I have to say my opinion is now that all the video footage available has been messed with and the buldings were hit with missiles and CGI used to mask the missiles to fool the watching world into believing planes hit the towers then explosives to bring them down. Too many errors and way too many coincidences.
MrEcologyDK Says:
May 22, 2012 - 2000 new photos? from where ....?
billy7connor Says:
May 23, 2012 - As i said - they don't prove anything - they make people ask questions.Why did WTC 7 collapse when WTC 3,4,5,6 took more damage?You can't prove anything by saying this "could happen" :P !!
12weasel100 Says:
May 23, 2012 - Well that is what is so fucking hilarious about you stupid assholes. After 10yrs you are still "asking questions" One would think after 10yrs you would have found answers and would be able to list of a long list of facts that logically explains and proves your shitty little theory. So if you are only asking questions why not logically explain why you are asking the questions you are asking. or are you just spewing out random shit thoughts with no reason behind it. You dumbass
billy7connor Says:
May 23, 2012 - Many of the answers can only be answered by the government - who aren't answering them :) there is no "random shit" , there's quite important points that need explanation :)
12weasel100 Says:
May 24, 2012 - well at least you are pretty much admitting you have no facts and are basing all your shit of your bullshit opinion. Now for the next step you should seek professional help to escape your deluded fantasy world. Your so called "important points" have been explained. You dumb shit.
airkooled05 Says:
May 24, 2012 - People are waking up all over . They dont buy the story of Muslims with box cutters does not wash . Stay the course and ignore the haters and name callers . They are here to distract you . This is your nation . You built it with your sweat and dollars . You have a right to the truth . Not some story they made up . Stay the course . Be safe . peace
homerbear46 Says:
May 25, 2012 - Yep...you talk a load of shit, get 4 thumbs for it,(like EVERY trolling "debunkernut" does) then say u have no fake (sock) accounts, and don't give a shit about ticks (cos you're so "cool" & are way "above"such pettiness)Fact 1`"fires & damage" do NOT account for the "collapse" of B7 (at 100%CD speed) Newton's 3rd Law kiddo...LEARN IT.* there is NO evidence of the severe damage or intense inferno debunkers LIE about, it isn't even shown on the fraudulent NIST "simulation"..
homerbear46 Says:
May 25, 2012 - ..Fact 2, please explain how a 100m horizontally is "well within the range" of a gravity ONLY driven "falling" object?Otherwise go have "fun" in UR "fantasy world"You stupid fuck.
blindedby2monkeys Says:
May 26, 2012 - and this will convince you it was mossad and or israel, it convinced me, how about you? thumb up to spread this - /watch?v=IQqWM0nRRPU
Emilaset Says:
May 26, 2012 - 3:36 GO SWEDISH DUDE! arbeit macht frei! xD
airkooled05 Says:
May 27, 2012 - of course it did . 2/3 of the trade center was vaporized . How did they accomplish this ???
12weasel100 Says:
May 27, 2012 - Fact 1- no tower including WTC7 fell at free fall. Fire can cause structures to collaspseFact 2- kinetic enger "flung" the beams out look it up "kiddo" besides any explination I offer is pointless in proving your theory. What I state or anyone states is irrelevant only facts will prove your theory and it is clear you have none/Your entire response was pure shit. You fail you moron.
Brady Peterson Says:
May 27, 2012 - unless you have a fucking brain and can think for yourself *herpaderp*
miakaal Says:
May 28, 2012 - Yeah I keep hearing that people are demanding answers and asking damning questions, but who are they asking? I bet if I went to the American Embassy here in London and asked for the official line on the attack, they would either politely tell me to "fuck off", or give me the official, published report that everyone say's is crap! So, have the TRUTHERS of America got anywhere or what?
SnakeSalmon8izback Says:
May 28, 2012 - defested troll is defeated












xadam2dudex Says:
May 20, 2012 - Manny Badillo is a terrible spokes person ..he stumbles all over the place..isn't there somebody who can speak clearly ?