Salon Attack on Ron Paul Refuted

jaabreu04 Says:

Feb 10, 2012 - The only thing you've said that is correct is that Iran supports Hezbollah. Why don't you actually research the conflict between Israel and Lebanon. That is when Hezbollah first came about, when Israel invaded and occupied Lebanon in 1982. Israel was then forced out of Lebanon by Hezbollah after the war in 2006. The only invader in Lebanon was Israel. You still haven't explained why we should attack a country that has no nukes and is of no threat to us.

KingDingaLing090 Says:

Feb 10, 2012 - Everything I said is 100% correct.Hezbollah occupies Lebanon now, they usurped to invasion of the South Lebanese Army, and the reason Israel invaded Lebanon is because of Syria's attacks on Israel via the proxy miltant group occupying Lebanon. .That proxy militant group is now known as Hezbollah (aka Iran). On top of that Iran was responsible for 9/11, -- according to a decision made by a Clinton appointed federal Judge. <-- Go defend them you backstabbing traitor.

jaabreu04 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - Whatever source you're using is wrong. Hezbollah originated from a shiite movement in Lebanon. So you're telling an organization that is indigenous to Lebanon invaded and occupied their own country? Israel invaded Lebanon to go after PLO after an assassination attempt. Then they occupied Lebanon. Did you bother to look at what that trial actually said. First off a decision was made with no Iranian representation. Convicting Iran without allowing Iran to the

jaabreu04 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - opportunity to fight the accusations already makes this a pretty weak conviction. The conviction only amounted to saying that Iran allowed passage for the hijackers through its country, not that it had any direct involvement or knowledge of the attack. By that logic every country, including the US, that the hijackers traveled through is responsible. Not to mention Iran, a Shiite government, doesn't like Al qaeda, a radical sunni organization, and helped go

jaabreu04 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - after Al qaeda after 911. I'm surprised you thought that conviction held any real weight. So far you've made a weak case for Iran indirectly invading someone, but even hypothetically saying Iran have invaded another country, so have many of other countries, especially the US. Does that mean the US should invade all those other countries. North Korea already has nukes and they kept saying how their leadership was and that they would use them. But we haven't

jaabreu04 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - leadership was crazy

jaabreu04 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - invaded them and North Korea hasn't attacked anyone with nukes. Iran also has constant surveillance by the IAEA in their nuclear facilities. The IAEA report had no evidence of a weapons program and even Defense Secretary Panetta admitted they had no weapons program. I bet you if Iran had nukes, just like North Korea, this situation would be solved with diplomacy. So are really bloodthisty enough to want to send more soldiers to die and kill people that have

jaabreu04 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - no nuclear weapons program and no long range military capability to attack the US directly. You want to condemn the people Iran to suffer and die in war because you don't like their leadership based on nonexistent threats. Did you approve of what happened in Iraq. We overthrew a former ally, Saddam, killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's, destroyed their countries infrastructure via bombing campaigns, and found no WMD's. Now we left Iraq divided and heading

jaabreu04 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - towards a civil war. After all the lies about Iraq, what makes you think our government has any credibility left when it comes to justifications to attack another country. I could keep going but me let know how you justify killing more people and sending more soldiers to die based on a threat that evidence shows doesn't exist.

jaabreu04 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - let me know

KingDingaLing090 Says:

Feb 11, 2012 - Just leave 20 comments in a row fuck it. I will read them (not). You are telling Ron Paul lies. The IAEA report said they are working towards a nuke and they have a missle delivery system. They openly say they are making one. Liar, liar, backstabbing pussy. You lie. There were no lies about Iraq, there was flaw in the intelligence. Liar.

KneelingAtlas Says:

Feb 13, 2012 - Mr. Woods,I can admire you resolute determination to make one last push for the Ron Paul presidency in 2012, but when will enough be enough? On inauguration night, will you be able to relax, replace your stress with calm and actually pity those citizens with such deep scars from their childhood that they cannot help building their own cages? Until a generation is raised without aggression and arbitrary authority, we will never be free. My favorite video: McCuistion with you and Doug Casey.

CBeeman1988 Says:

Feb 14, 2012 - Since when is Iran responsible for 9/11? We were told it was Bin Ladin in Afganistan.. then Iraq... now you're suggesting that it is Iran's fault?In the name of your excessive finger pointing.. I'm going to respectfully suggest that 9/11 was Russia's fault... no, no... it was Canada's fault... no wait.. it was your fault, Mr. DingaLing

KingDingaLing090 Says:

Feb 14, 2012 - Nobody ever said Iraq was responsible for 9/11, get your lies straight. We invaded Iraq because of flawed CIA intelligence and Saddam funding terrorists. Iran is responsible for 9/11 since the decision of a federal judge whom sat on a several year hearing for 'the families of the victims of 9/11 vs. Al Qaeda, Hizbolla and Iran.'I suggest you take a good look in the mirror you ignorant fuck. You are a backstabbing terrorist sympathizer. Go read the case nimrod.

tabletalk33 Says:

Feb 25, 2012 - A very fine treatment, Tom. Thank you for posting this. The more I listen to Ron Paul, the more I am convinced that he is the man of the hour. The slimy lies being thrown at him are shocking, but I will not be deterred. I am voting for Ron Paul! I encourage others to do the same.

nikeheadd06 Says:

Mar 5, 2012 - I am never going on Yahoo.com again, left wing media that ignores Ron Paul.Ron Paul 2012

SHNUCAU Says:

Mar 8, 2012 - Great video except the part about Andrew Jackson. He sucks.

bobshenix Says:

Apr 3, 2012 - He was the first US president targeted for assassination for a reason!! He was VEHEMENTLY against renewing the charter for the First National Bank-- a group of Fed-like central bankers. In Jackson's words:"You are a den of vipers and thieves. You used your power to speculate on the breadstuffs of the nation. When you were right, you split the profits amongst yourselves. When you were wrong, you charged the losses to the bank (dumping them on the taxpayer)... i WILL run you out of this country"

KneelingAtlas Says:

Feb 13, 2012 - Mr. Woods,I can admire you resolute determination to make one last push for the Ron Paul presidency in 2012, but when will enough be enough? On inauguration night, will you be able to relax, replace your stress with calm and actually pity those citizens with such deep scars from their childhood that they cannot help building their own cages? Until a generation is raised without aggression and arbitrary authority, we will never be free. My favorite video: McCuistion with you and Doug Casey.

CBeeman1988 Says:

Feb 14, 2012 - Since when is Iran responsible for 9/11? We were told it was Bin Ladin in Afganistan.. then Iraq... now you're suggesting that it is Iran's fault?In the name of your excessive finger pointing.. I'm going to respectfully suggest that 9/11 was Russia's fault... no, no... it was Canada's fault... no wait.. it was your fault, Mr. DingaLing

KingDingaLing090 Says:

Feb 14, 2012 - Nobody ever said Iraq was responsible for 9/11, get your lies straight. We invaded Iraq because of flawed CIA intelligence and Saddam funding terrorists. Iran is responsible for 9/11 since the decision of a federal judge whom sat on a several year hearing for 'the families of the victims of 9/11 vs. Al Qaeda, Hizbolla and Iran.'I suggest you take a good look in the mirror you ignorant fuck. You are a backstabbing terrorist sympathizer. Go read the case nimrod.

tabletalk33 Says:

Feb 25, 2012 - A very fine treatment, Tom. Thank you for posting this. The more I listen to Ron Paul, the more I am convinced that he is the man of the hour. The slimy lies being thrown at him are shocking, but I will not be deterred. I am voting for Ron Paul! I encourage others to do the same.

nikeheadd06 Says:

Mar 5, 2012 - I am never going on Yahoo.com again, left wing media that ignores Ron Paul.Ron Paul 2012

SHNUCAU Says:

Mar 8, 2012 - Great video except the part about Andrew Jackson. He sucks.

bobshenix Says:

Apr 3, 2012 - He was the first US president targeted for assassination for a reason!! He was VEHEMENTLY against renewing the charter for the First National Bank-- a group of Fed-like central bankers. In Jackson's words:"You are a den of vipers and thieves. You used your power to speculate on the breadstuffs of the nation. When you were right, you split the profits amongst yourselves. When you were wrong, you charged the losses to the bank (dumping them on the taxpayer)... i WILL run you out of this country"