If you like the video, share it with your friends on these social sites:

 

Title: May 2011 BBC Interview with Dr. Niels Harrit.

Added: Oct 4, 2011

Author: webjakob

Duration: 132:51

Description:
This May 10, 2011 interview of Dr. Niels Harrit, Associate Professor Emeritus of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen, was conducted by Michael Rudin of the BBC.The occasion was the making of a new BBC production in the Conspiracy Files series for the tenth anniversary of 9/11.Copyright Niels Harrit.(360p)

Related Videos:

Videos related to 'May 2011 BBC Interview with Dr. Niels Harrit.'

Channel: Nonprofit

Tags: niels  harrit  rudin  bbc  9/11nanothermite  conspiracy  files 



niels  harrit  rudin  bbc  9/11nanothermite  conspiracy  files 

Youtube Comments: 323

blackArt2000 Says:

May 7, 2012 - HAhah Back at work huh! And you know what this guy did huh! he brought the chips to a few degrees before autoignition point and just cooked them for a while, then analysed the chemical difference! LOL! By the way Say hi to 911 Sausageman .. he sits just around the corner from you! LOL

ctcole77 Says:

May 7, 2012 - Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific ConsultantsWTC Dust Study2/28/2012"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments.""There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

SwaggerLikeMe2009 Says:

May 10, 2012 - Love how Dr. Harrit says"conspiracy theory". Haha. Poor guy cnt say it to save his life. hahaha... Very smart man tho!

pavson77 Says:

May 11, 2012 - Rudy Giuliani & the Feds Destroyed WTC Evidencewatch?v=GxycV4fNPnQ

OreadNYC Says:

May 11, 2012 - This BBC interviewer's behavior is very unprofessional. With all due respect, where did this guy study journalism (or does he have a degree in journalism at all)? He asks compound questions, tries to put words in the professor's mouth, doesn't seem to be making much effort to listen to him, frequently interrupts and/or contradicts him while he's talking, and appears every bit as resistant to anything the professor has to say as he accuses the professor of being to what the reporter has to say.

alawson911 Says:

May 13, 2012 - Michael Rudin kept asking for Dr. Harrit's opinion about the motive behind the attacks. As someone listed as having a Jewish background, was Mr Rudin hoping that Dr Harrit would mention the possibility that Zionist Israel had a strong motive to stir up trouble against one of its, then, arch enemies: Iraq?Of course this comment will attract accusations of anti-Semitism, but Rudin opened the door, so many times, that my question is more than legitimate because it speaks to Rudin's own motives.

jyuja Says:

May 13, 2012 - Kudos to Dr. Harris for his rigorous and compelling testimony against the fraudulent 911 official narrative and for keeping his cool in spite of Rudin's rottweiler type questioning and totally flawed argumentation. Dr. Harris a true scientist on facts and a Jesus Christ on morality .Those who orchestrated/supported a heinous crime like 911 are regretfully still hiding in the shadowy corridors of power in Washington and on Wall Street also thanks to shameful reporting like the BBC.

emil4392 Says:

May 13, 2012 - Dr. Harris Rules

whole2th Says:

May 13, 2012 - ReDiscover911(dot)comIt wasn't muslims.This BBC reporter should be arrested on charges of racketeering--complicity in the cover-up of the crimes of 9 11. His superiors at the BBC should also be taken into custody on the same charges.

whole2th Says:

May 13, 2012 - How did the BBC know to report (twice) that Building 7 had collapsed--twenty three minutes BEFORE it had collapsed? The BBC's Jane Standley announces the collapse even while Building 7 still stands right behind her head. George Orwell warned of such "Halls of Truth" as the BBC.

newsmanbluesman Says:

May 15, 2012 - The host does not know the difference between eyewitness - and witness. Eyewitness is the bystander, with no dog in the fight - first hand view, plus maybe objectivity. Witness and expert witness describes others who testify - questioned authority, like FBI Agents, or soemtimes, the defendant - even that person is a witness by dint of taking the stand. Rudin's notion that FBI agent is an eyewitness to plane parts - which parts the agent witholds - is wrong. Any judge would demand the exhibit.

newsmanbluesman Says:

May 15, 2012 - @ThinkingisallowedRudin seems to think anyone who was there on the day will have a key to the absolute truth of who was in the cockpits, and how they got there - over the years it took them to get there. He's just done it again here at 50 minutes mark. Just think how foolish that is.Just Like Chris Bury of ABC w Loose Change makers - Rudin, waiting, and baiting, to get clip - plainly re-sets after any Harrit response that has not qualified for use & derision later. Hence the non-sequiturs.

fuelguzzlerdk Says:

May 17, 2012 - The BBC reporter's agenda is to try to discredit Niels Harrit and try to make him untrustworthy.

ctcole77 Says:

May 20, 2012 - Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific ConsultantsWTC Dust Study2/28/2012"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments." "There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

ctcole77 Says:

May 20, 2012 - Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific ConsultantsWTC Dust Study2/28/2012"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments." "There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

ctcole77 Says:

May 20, 2012 - Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific ConsultantsWTC Dust Study2/28/2012"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments." "There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

ctcole77 Says:

May 20, 2012 - Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific ConsultantsWTC Dust Study2/28/2012"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments." "There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

ctcole77 Says:

May 20, 2012 - Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific ConsultantsWTC Dust Study2/28/2012"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments." "There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

TheEvangelism Says:

May 22, 2012 - This interviewer is definately not reflecting the values of the BBC but is perhaps acting on his poor reasoning. His logic and reasoning ability is much like a child. This is not BBC standard of questioning, I cannot believe his line of questioning regardless of his view, it also seems that he is not very well informed on the subject.

jyuja Says:

May 24, 2012 - Kudos to Dr. Harris for his rigorous and compelling testimony against the fraudulent 911 official narrative and for keeping his cool in spite of Rudin's rottweiler type questioning and totally flawed argumentation. Dr. Harris a true scientist on facts and a Jesus Christ on morality .Those who orchestrated/supported a heinous crime like 911 are regretfully still hiding in the shadowy corridors of power in Washington and on Wall Street also thanks to shameful reporting like the BBC.

pennymac16 Says:

May 24, 2012 - Now I am not a(n) (investigative) Journalist but too me the lack of competence and reasoning skills by the interviewer are embarrassing. He behaves like someone from the yellowpress jumping on every misinterpreted or twisted statement by the surprisingly calm Dr. Harrit.

Thinkingisallowed Says:

May 25, 2012 - Exactly, you nailed it.

newsmanbluesman Says:

May 25, 2012 - @ThinkingisallowedOr, we are both mad as hatters. And, mad as Harrits. Anyway great upload and this is the last story that requires person-on-the-street interviews, let alone, their exaltation by Michael Rudin. I consider myself a genetic democrat in most things, but if I never saw a POS interview again, on any subject, I'd be okay.Does Mr R consider the on-site interviews of Dealey Plaza '63 quite useless and misleading - as do official versions? That bet is like Spain for the soccer

Shopping | prank calls | Wholesale products | english movies | prank calls | proxy | links | prank call

Topfacebookvideos funny arabic videos

Privacy Policy