If you like the video, share it with your friends on these social sites:

 

Title: The Theory of Evolution in 2 Minutes.

Added: Jun 8, 2009

Author: DonExodus2

Duration: 1:58

Description:
Theory of evolution- what it is, what it says, how it works in 2 minutes.Creation Vs EvolutionCreationism TheoriesCreation Vs. Evolution DebateCreationism V.s. EvolutionEvidence of CreationismCreationism Evolution ArgumentsHuman EvolutionProof of CreationFacts on CreationismEvolution Versus CreationismEvolution of ManCreation Vs EvolutionEvolution EvidenceHuman Evolution TimelineX-men EvolutionHuman Evolution ChartNatural Selectiondarwindarwin awardsdarwins theory of evolutiondarwinismdarwins theorydarwins theory of natural selectiondarwin theory evolutiondarwin theory of evolutiondarwin theorydarwins finchesReligion Vs. EvolutionEvolution of ManScience Vs Religion EvolutionHuman EvolutionReligious Theories of EvolutionTheistic EvolutionChristian Religion EvolutionSatan's EvolutionGreek Religion EvolutionDefine EvolutionBiography of Richard DawkinsDawkins EvolutionBiologist Richard DawkinsRichard Dawkins on Life after DeathRichard Dawkins the Selfish GeneRichard Dawkins Quotes, Richard DawkinsWhat Is Richard Dawkins Known for?Richard Dawkins MemesRichard Dawkins the Blind WatchmakerAtheism And BeliefsAtheism ReligionKenneth Miller Finding Darwin's GodEvolution Versus ChristianityGod EvolutionPope EvolutionEvolution Versus Creation TheoryEvolution DebatesHuman EvolutionEvolution of ManCreation Vs EvolutionEvolution EvidenceCreationism Vs.evolutionCreationism TheoriesCreationism Evolution ArgumentsCreationism Vs. EvolutionismEvolution Versus CreationismDefinition of CreationismScientific CreationismEvolution Creationism SchoolsShould Creationism Be Taught in Public SchoolsArticle on Evolution And Creationismintelligent designintelligent design theoryintelligent design theory of the universeintelligent design vs darwin theoryintelligent design be taught in schoolintelligent design evolutionintelligent design in public schoolsintelligent design vs. evolutionintelligent design in schoolsintelligent design pros and consDefinition of Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design Vs Darwin TheoryEvidence for Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design Theory of the UniverseIntelligent Design Be Taught in SchoolCreationism And Intelligent DesignSummary of Intelligent DesignWhat Does the Theory of Intelligent Design Say??

Related Videos:

Videos related to 'The Theory of Evolution in 2 Minutes.'

Channel: Tech

Tags: evolutionary  biology  intelligent  design  creationism  evolution  charles  darwin  dawkins  speciation 



evolutionary  biology  intelligent  design  creationism  evolution  charles  darwin  dawkins  speciation 

Youtube Comments: 5793

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 25, 2012 - ...taking place now and quickly. The modern view is that it took place long ago and very slowly." Think about that for a moment. Your evolutionary system has returned to the Dark Ages! It is quite sad that you do not know this, but what is even more sad, is that you do not recognize this as an essential teaching of your system. However, true science teaches biogenesis, which means, that life can only come from life and, specifically, that species...

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 25, 2012 - ...can only come from living parents in the same species. Therefore, the burden of proof is on you to prove your magical fairy tale.

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 25, 2012 - " there is no evidence anywhere in the world" This is a blatant lie and that paper I posted proves it." I have already addressed this issue: By "predisposition" they mean that the primitive environment had "just the right atmosphere" and that the ground, water, or ocean where the process began had "just the right combination of chemicals." They do not work with the sand and seawater in the back lot where they believe the whole process took place. And even with their...

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 25, 2012 - ...million-dollar laboratories where they engage in their work they still believe that sand and seawater somehow did it all by itself. Does the article prove that RNA came from raw chemicals from sand and seawater by itself? NO, IT DOES NOT! I could have a deskfull of peer-reviewed papers to prove this phenomenon does not occur in nature by itself, but I don't need to because IT DOES NOT HAPPEN. Your article tries to say other wise, but it fails miserably. How many times do I have...

TheZooCrew Says:

May 25, 2012 - " Your evolutionary system has returned to the Dark Ages!"You're using an incorrect/outdated definition. That's why you use SCIENTIFIC resources for SCIENTIFIC queries, not encyclopedias.Asimov died in 1992. Most abiogenesis work was conducted after then." It is quite sad that you do not know this"Then why can't you prove it? Why can't you provide a SINGLE example of spontaneous generation being taught as fact in the classroom?

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 25, 2012 - ...to say this for you to get it through your thick melon?

TheZooCrew Says:

May 25, 2012 - "Does the article prove that RNA came from raw chemicals from sand and seawater by itself? "That's not what it sets out to do. You're merely too stupid to understand what it actually says." IT DOES NOT HAPPEN."But given the right environment...it could. Earth was different in the past, and we can PROVE this. You'd rather postulate magic."Your article tries to say other wise, but it fails miserably. "Again, this is because you're ignorant and prefer semantics over science.

TheZooCrew Says:

May 25, 2012 - You can lie all you want, but it's still a lie. You don't know anything about anything, yet wildly claim that a peer-reviewed document doesn't come to a certain conclusion. I mean, you don't know what half the words in that document even mean. Nor are you honest about what I claimed. Your straw man is pathetic.

TheZooCrew Says:

May 25, 2012 - All I need to do is provide a plausible avenue for abiogenesis. One little experiment...like one that proves that nucleotides CAN form spontaneously in the prebiotic environment (there are numerous papers on this one)...and abiogenesis is automatically superior to magic. In fact, even WITHOUT evidence, natural explanations are superior. Mostly because EVERY time we've invented a magical explanation for something, we've been horribly wrong.

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 25, 2012 - I have cornered you once again and you go back to the same wimpy tactic, ignorance on my part. It's getting old.

TheZooCrew Says:

May 25, 2012 - "It's getting old."Then stop lying.I would normally have no problem with your criticism of abiogenesis...but not only do you claim it's impossible (and thus claim knowledge you don't have), but you postulate a magical alternative for no reason other than delusion from indoctrination. Unacceptable. "I don't know" is acceptable. "Goddidit and shut up" is not.

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 25, 2012 - "All I need to do is provide a plausible avenue for abiogenesis." WRONG! It should be happening everywhere and at any time if you are to say that it took place in the past.

TheZooCrew Says:

May 25, 2012 - " It should be happening everywhere and at any time if you are to say that it took place in the past."Are you drunk? When is this true for ANYTHING? Volcanoes aren't happening every at anytime. Giant meteorite strikes aren't, either. Does this mean these things don't happen?

TheZooCrew Says:

May 25, 2012 - Of course, MAGIC isn't happening anywhere at any time, yet you claim it exists. Nice double standard.

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 26, 2012 - No, these are two different positions in antithesis. I claim that life can only come from life, while you claim that life can come from non-life. Which one is more plausible?

TheZooCrew Says:

May 26, 2012 - " I claim that life can only come from life, while you claim that life can come from non-life."This is disgustingly simplified to the point of inaccuracy. I bet you can't even define "life" properly.Furthermore...notice how only one of us is claiming knowledge no one could possibly have. In addition, you MUST be postulating magic because we KNOW that there was a time when there wasn't life on Earth. How did it get here?

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 26, 2012 - We can conclusively demonstrate that there was a time when there was no life on Earth. Here is another one of your "we" statement which you are trying to turn into a universal principle.

TheZooCrew Says:

May 26, 2012 - "Here is another one of your "we" statement which you are trying to turn into a universal principle."Why are you such a dumb shit? When someone says "we landed on the moon," do you punch them in the face and scream "YOU DIDN'T GO TO THE MOON STOP SAYING YOU DID!"?We CAN conclusively prove this despite all of your lies.

TheZooCrew Says:

May 26, 2012 - Here's a good series:/watch?v=wg1fs6vp9Ok&feature=bf_prev&list=PLE8E361594C26EA35

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 26, 2012 - I getting a bit tired so I think I will turn in. How close are you to finishing up your post-graduate work? Anyway, have a good one.

TheZooCrew Says:

May 26, 2012 - Just graduated. So I have two degrees and you can't go back to the tired "stupid student" meme that wasn't accurate in the first place.Not like you care. I don't need your faked respect.

TheHistoryguy10 Says:

May 26, 2012 - Hey, just relax. What are your plans now? Do you have a job lined up?

TheZooCrew Says:

May 26, 2012 - I have a job in a lab now, but I have a few definite leads. Probably sticking around for the summer, then taking off for industry.

Casshyr Says:

May 26, 2012 - now you are talking two different things. Before you are commenting that evolutionists don't subscribe to RNA world. And now you are switching the issue to demanding for evidence! Two different issues!I'm not here to support RNA world hypothesis. It's too loose right now. But I am here to tell you that it is a FACT that most evolutionists subscribe to this. If you want to talk about evidence for this phenomenon, then go read scientific articles, i'm not interested in this at the moment.

Casshyr Says:

May 26, 2012 - "They are subscribing to the "presupposition" that somehow life over long periods of time came from non-life" => yes and no. This statement is too general. Most evolutionists subscribe that life first came from RNA-based life forms, and this primitive self-replicative RNA is derived from raw chemicals. Whether there is concrete evidence behind this or not, that's a separate issue. And like my earlier post, i am not interested to talk about evidence behind abiogenesis.

Shopping | prank calls | Wholesale products | english movies | prank calls | proxy | links | prank call

Topfacebookvideos funny arabic videos

Privacy Policy