|
|
|
|
Title: Dead People Receive Ballots in NH Primary
Added: Jan 11, 2012
Author: veritasvisuals
Duration: 10:7
Description:
Donate to projectveritas.com On January 10th, Project Veritas reporters walked into New Hampshire Polling Locations during the Presidential Primaries, saying dead people's names. We stated the name of a dead person we got from the NH obituaries. The names of the deceased were both Registered Republican and Democrats And in almost every case, saying a dead person's name, we were handed a ballot to cast a vote. We used no misrepresentation and no false pretenses. in fact, in almost every case, we insisted we show ID and they insisted that we vote without showing ID. Thanks to DailyCaller.com for breaking story.
Related Videos:
Videos related to 'Dead People Receive Ballots in NH Primary'
Channel: News
Tags: new hampshire james o'keefe ballot project veritas presidential election
new hampshire james o'keefe ballot project veritas presidential election
Youtube Comments: 3267
MaxSplinters Says:
Apr 18, 2012 - Noblesse Oblige? Odd choice, I have neither wealth, nor power....Hate filled shit head? Now your projecting....What part of FREE don't you understand?
AMX70 Says:
Apr 20, 2012 - @MaxSplinters yea, for a voice of reason, when lefty loons use the charitable side of being human, and then entrap people with the " so sad your down & out" syndrome. we are "guilty if we don't pay for the religion of the lefy,liberal,progressive & Marxist plan for power!!
ABGAN100 Says:
Apr 23, 2012 - If they can afford a cup of coffee they can afford an ID, lack of income is not an excuse, even a beggar on the street can afford an ID many states give them away for free!
MaxSplinters Says:
Apr 23, 2012 - All states will issue a free photo ID to the indigent. Its just another excuse the Libs use to obfuscate the issue. If SEIU or ACORN can load up buses to "register Mickey Mouse" , why cant they load the buses and drive "Mickey" to the photo ID administrators office?
MaxSplinters Says:
Apr 23, 2012 - Bingo!
AMX70 Says:
Apr 23, 2012 - @MaxSplinters perfectly said.
midtra52 Says:
Apr 24, 2012 - So this is how Romney won NH.
Regulus777 Says:
Apr 24, 2012 - I had a feeling this was quite possible when I voted in Mass.... Ugh disgusting!!! they made no effort to confirm your identity!
butuh13 Says:
Apr 26, 2012 - @ABGAN100 There is no such thing as a free state photo ID. Tax payers will cover the cost.
butuh13 Says:
Apr 26, 2012 - Anyone who call for costly and intrusive new photo ID laws to address vote fraud they can't even prove is occurring automatically forfeits their right to claim they oppose big intrusive government overreach and wasteful spending.
randyzabel66 Says:
Apr 27, 2012 - Costly ID laws are you serious? How are ID laws costly to the government? And how is requiring an ID intrusive? These videos prove the potential for fraud, and investigations have actually occurred.
butuh13 Says:
Apr 27, 2012 - @randyzabel66 Every photo ID costs money to process and make. There are millions of legit voters that don't have a photo ID with their current name and/or address, meaning giving them all free ID will cost millions. Creating a new law that would block legit voters is intrusive and unnecessary.
MaxSplinters Says:
Apr 27, 2012 - Perhaps you should show randyzabel your copy of the "Brennen Report".....LOL..
MaxSplinters Says:
Apr 27, 2012 - Anyone who is for denying voter transparency knows their side can't win without fraud...I understand back on Oct 15, 2002 Saddam Hussein election with 99% of the vote. No ID required..
butuh13 Says:
Apr 28, 2012 - You wrote- "...their side can't win without fraud..."Perhaps you could show randyzabel a case where vote fraud changed the outcome... LOL... I'll take the findings of the Brennan Center over your baseless bullshit any day.Oh, be sure to tell him about those "free" IDs too...LOL...
MaxSplinters Says:
Apr 29, 2012 - Indeed...Mazo, the Herald-Tribune reporter, later said that he found names of the dead who had voted in Chicago, along with 56 people from one house.the Chicago Tribune wrote that "the election of November 8 was characterized by such gross and palpable fraud as to justify the conclusion that [Nixon] was deprived of victory."[19] Had Nixon won both states, he would have ended up with exactly 270 electoral votes and the presidency, with or without a victory in the popular vote.
butuh13 Says:
Apr 29, 2012 - You skipped the part about Mazo finding Republican fraud as well...and both state and federal investigations finding no such evidence. Thanks for establishing that the most recent case you can find is 50 years old. I guess that means you accept that all Democrats since then were fairly elected, despite your lie. With that post, you've done more to establish that vote fraud is not a significant problem than I have. Now go spit on a woman using foodstamps so you can feel better about yourself.
MaxSplinters Says:
Apr 29, 2012 - At least three people were sent to jail for election-related crimes, and677 others were indicted before being acquitted by Judge John M.Karns, a Daley crony.J. Edgar Hoover believed Nixon actually won the presidency but in deciding to follownormal procedures and refer the FBI's findings to the attorney general- as of Jan. 20, 1961, Robert F. Kennedy - he effectively buried thecase."
MaxSplinters Says:
Apr 29, 2012 - You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.
butuh13 Says:
Apr 29, 2012 - As I said, federal and state investigations didn't find the evidence you believe in. Nixon and the Republican party dropped their challenge. Your quote from Stalin refers to TABULATION fraud, which photo ID laws will not affect. In order for one to vote, there must be a corresponding registration.Even back in 1960 there was probably more tabulation fraud than there were people voting with someone else's name. But again, if a 50 year old example is all you have I'd say your out of ammo.
butuh13 Says:
Apr 29, 2012 - Registration fraud is a different issue. Tabulation fraud is a different issue. Electronic voting is a different issue. Absentee ballot fraud is a different issue. ALL of those are of REAL concern. But do you address ANY of those issues? No. Do you call for better purging of the names of deceased voters from the rolls? No. You just want photo ID laws because you've been manipulated by propaganda. NOW- go call a guy on unemployment a socialist. It'll make you feel better about yourself.
Billybobobist Says:
May 15, 2012 - So, yet again the only people committing voter fraud are James O'Keefe and his Republican cronies.
jpw6466 Says:
May 18, 2012 - I think you may be missing the point. Shouldn't there be something put in place that would prevent what COULD have happened from happening? I would appreciate polite dialogue on this, and would readily accept that this doesn't create a cause for concern.
daven58100 Says:
May 21, 2012 - Yes. Everyone knows democrats don't commit voter fraud. By the way, did you know the sky is purple?
MaxSplinters Says:
Apr 18, 2012 - When I see the 17 year old little girl with 2 babies in tow, standing in front of me at the 7-11 buying 2 bags of Fritos and a sugar free latte with her EBT card, its not contempt I feel, but pity. Pity for the "millions of my countrymen" that your liberal policies have striped of their humanity. With the promise of a free ride, liberal policies have destroyed the family, murdered babies and "kept his brown brother" on the plantation. The contempt part sir, I reserve that for people like you.