Whales evolution

archilles1195 Says:

May 23, 2012 - "Wow you are delusional. All the while we were talking about evolution of sexual reproduction, but all of a sudden you came with "why men have nipples?". It's never about nipples. You didn't even address my initial question, which was "What if males didn't evolve as quickly as females? Wouldn't that generation die off immediately? Didn't both sexes have to exist in a finished form in order for the human race to reproduce?"

archilles1195 Says:

May 23, 2012 - Good, you just save my time because I can say the same exact thing to you.

Dragontao1 Says:

May 23, 2012 - @archiiles1195 So let me address your more wild assumptions first and then we can move on to science. I'm a full time student, my major i overs both life science and human Psychology. This makes talking to people like you very interesting. Posting on forums takes about 5 minute of my day. I post on my iPhone and iPad which I can afford because I have a "real job" Generally I learn more about biology here since every time you make an outrageous statement it causes me to research it. It's a much

Dragontao1 Says:

May 23, 2012 - @archilles1195 You insinuated that since scientists have not reached a conclusion on sex, that this somehow invalidated evolution.My only point was this could be applied to nipples and creationism as well. As for reproduction, the clues are in an unborn fetus. Fetuses have a proto-genitals that could go either way if the right hormone is applied. This can, and has happen outside the womb in humans. So gender may have originated from Gynogenesis.

archilles1195 Says:

May 23, 2012 - Although I've made up my mind about entertaining you for it would be endless and tiresome, I laugh at your argument of sexual reproduction because you started with "fetus", just like Dawkins started his explanation of eyes evolution with "light sensitive cells", spawned out of nowhere. Digest my question, understand it, and do research about it, hopefully you find the answers that has been eluded by evolutionary scientists for so many years until today. Good luck.

Dragontao1 Says:

May 23, 2012 - @archilles1195 it's not a questionable answer. Human ancestors were not even mammals when gender evolved. So asking how "Humans" evolved gender is a non-sequitur. It's laughable, at first I thought you just didn't understand. Now I can see you are just deliberately ignorant. Both you and Alex and that other guy are a source of endless non-sequiturs and straw-man arguments. While I do find it psychologically interesting it's also frustrating. Darwin did not have all the answers and neither doe

swampertbanka1 Says:

May 23, 2012 - coming from the brainwashed 17 year old kid that has nothing better to do than troll on this page, your so stupid dude believing in god haha you inferior human

swampertbanka1 Says:

May 23, 2012 - Dragontao1 u can have a more reasonable conversation with a brick wall than with this 17 year old brainwashed kid, i dont know if you noticed but if you go back to previous comments this guy has been trolling this page for months he will never listen everything you explain has already been told to him but hes clueless and ignorant as ever, hes bitching that we bash on religion when look what hes doing coming to a scientific page and causing problems hes the hypocrite here

Hobu123 Says:

May 23, 2012 - >>>>It found that we are 98% chimp and 60% banana.Sorry to burst your bubble of nonsense, but such studies do not exist in the form you are claiming. Next time read more carefully what the studies say. There is no such study that says that humans share 60% of genes with banana. Next time get your "information" from somewhere else than blogs of biblical cretinist liars.>>>>hates the idea of GodWhether god exists or not changes nothing in the fact that evolution occurs.

Dragontao1 Says:

May 23, 2012 - @swampertbanks1 Yes, he seems to have locked himself in some dark closet of ignorance.Yet Its interesting to see people of that mindset come here and project things on scientific theories. Some of my favorites are" You atheists are zealots following a mindless religion!" or "How can you believe that life came from nothing?" They dont really realize they are actually voicing their own self doubts and anxiety. They have become masters of Psychological Projection because thats the only way they

swampertbanka1 Says:

May 23, 2012 - yup the last 2 sentences describe them perfectly like my best friends are religions but i at least respect their views as they do mine, it becomes a problem when these religious nutjobs show up in these scientific videos and say we are causing the problem when its actually them remember that dudes name i can guarantee you its not the last time youll see his comments on this video he just likes causing problems

alexthasy Says:

May 25, 2012 - I found a very interesting evolutionist site looking in the fact that in most species, the sex ratio at the zygote stage is about 50:50. Interesting that natural selection is understood by atheists as being the cosmic force overlooking sex allocation. Check it out by googling the followingThe sex ratio gives the proportion of males to females in a population. In most species, the sex ratio at the zygote stage is about 50:50.That is priceless in revealing the religious nature of Darwinism

pinball281 Says:

May 26, 2012 - what came first, the fish or the fish eggs?

Dragontao1 Says:

May 26, 2012 - @alexthasy As usual your phenomenal data mining skills have proven legendary(read:sarcasm) However you lack of critical thinking skills continue to defy reason. What does the sex ration have to do with your ridiculous opinion that science is somehow a religion?