If you like the video, share it with your friends on these social sites:

 

Title: Should Animals Be Doing More For Animal Rights?

Added: Feb 27, 2008

Author: TheOnion

Duration: 1:55

Description:
Panelists discuss whether animals should play a more active role in the fight for their rights by participating in marches or organizing boycotts.More coverage at: http://onion.com

Related Videos:

Videos related to 'Should Animals Be Doing More For Animal Rights?'

Channel: Shows

Tags: the onion  comedy  satire  news  onion news network  onn 



the onion  comedy  satire  news  onion news network  onn 

Youtube Comments: 1669

Arundodonax Says:

Feb 17, 2012 - Speciesist?

zaxtor Says:

Feb 17, 2012 - Speciesism meansThe assumption of human superiority leading to the exploitation of animals.Is like racism toward other species and it belong to discrimination just like racism, sexism, xenophobia etc.Christianity is also considered a speciesist religion because is soo anthropocentrism.Treats animals as "resources" and it can be treated badly as possible.Also these inbred hicks sportsmen are hardcore Christians and they abuse animals, torture animals and more.

Arundodonax Says:

Feb 17, 2012 - So does that mean the lion attacking the gazelle is also being a speciesist?

zaxtor Says:

Feb 17, 2012 - We're a conscious species for hell sake.Lions and other animals are OBLIGATED to do it or otherwise they've starve.They are in survival mode.We're not. We do it for sport, pleasure and pure enjoyment, we enjoy the suffer of other species which is wrong.As for tribes. They do it for survival, they don't do it for sport or no reasons.Stupid hicks like hunters and trappers does it for sport and profit.As for animals playing with their prey, is for their dexterity and learning

zaxtor Says:

Feb 17, 2012 - P2 to hunt and survive.If animals would be conscious and evolved into intelligent being maybe they'd see that as wrong and immoral.Today most inbred hicks does it for sport, trophy and pleasure which is considered speciesism and animal hating bigotry.

Arundodonax Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - So, if you had a large sum of money, and you could put it towards an operation to save either an infant's life, or a beloved family pet's life, which would you choose?

zaxtor Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - A pet is not an endangered species and others.If is between 2 of them.I'd save an infant life. for the surgery.In Canada by law they have to operate on you even if you cannot afford surgery they have to cus is the law.In USA sadly you pay or die.But there are some hospitals they do it for free. You know the series ER that hospital show. Is an hospital like that, that they save you but is not common.I can be wrong. All I know is USA needs a healthcare like Canada.Free.

Arundodonax Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - You'd rather save the infant life? You speciesist you...

zaxtor Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - I would save a person above a pet I never met.I would save an endangered species above a human I never met.I would save my dog's life before a person life.I'm not speciesist.Speciesist would save a human life above a rare species. Even a rapist life above an animal life.I'd surely save a common animal above people with negative values such as a rapist and murderers because they don't deserve to life.Google"What is more precious human life or an endangered species life?"

zaxtor Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - P2.Is a part of my site when you google that phrase with the "and it explain that who would I save first.

Arundodonax Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - I've read your site, and I suppose not surprisingly I've narrowed down our point of difference to your claim that "Species value is based on its RARITY not consciousness." I have two responses to this: First, I would argue that the self-awareness and greater intelligence of human beings imparts both an extra value to the human life (i.e. greater potential than any animal), and an added injustice to ending it (the unique suffering caused by the knowledge that one's life is ending).(Con't)

Arundodonax Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - Second, I would say that making your primary moral concern the continued existence of individual species is an arbitrary judgment. Given that most likely other species will adapt to fill the void in the now extinct species former ecological niche, why should I concern myself with the extinction of any species? Should not the welfare of the entire ecosystem by my primary moral concern, given that all species depend on it? Shouldn't I be not anthrocentric, nor biocentric, but ecocentric?

zaxtor Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - Nothing wrong with euthanizing an animal with a terminal illness and no hope for treatment. Some countries does it to people wishing to be euthanised because of terminal cancer. It should be up to them not the government. Is their body not the government owning it.Ecocentric is more extreme than biocentrism.Is caring for all life and valuing its value above ur own.Jainism is ecocentric example, they wouldn't even kill smallest bug.They wouldn't kill a tree completely etc.

zaxtor Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - P2 man is a conscious species and he shouldn't wipe em out cus is doing it on purpose.man done enough already.VHEMT explains about the greed of man.

Jamietron666 Says:

Feb 24, 2012 - Hahahaha oh my god everyone just shut the fuck up. This is the fucking Onion, not a debating chamber for your pseudo intellectual bullshit.

TheRealBibwitHarte Says:

Mar 2, 2012 - @Jamietron666 YouTube needs to implement a shitstorm feature, where back and forth replies are removed from the general comments section.

Widwo1324 Says:

Mar 3, 2012 - They are taking this as a joke . This is retarded that they joke about this. The animals in animal testing go through hell everyday .

thedarkone2134 Says:

Mar 3, 2012 - I know, the people seen in this video are as serious as they come and this video like all on the Internet is 100% true.It's horrible.

FreelanceProgrammer Says:

Mar 5, 2012 - Unless you find an alternative the industry and the general population just don't care.Besides, They are not making fun of Animal Cruelty you peanut, They are making fun of PETA who in my personal opinion are as insane as they get. There are better more civil ways to bring across the message of animal cruelty than what PETA does. Quite frankly PETA makes me care less.Like this: bit[dot]ly[slash]A9R08CWhat is that getting across? To most males all they will see is a naked woman.

FreelanceProgrammer Says:

Mar 5, 2012 - Just last week they did an expose on A Human Kidney donor! It was great. 200 Kidneys, I thank those who could be so kind.

Tommyogga Says:

Mar 8, 2012 - What did I just watch?

dalektaliban Says:

Mar 14, 2012 - my animals are taking action, one of my snakes has been on a hunger strike for 3 fucking weeks

0Heavy0Metal0 Says:

Mar 28, 2012 - My animals are on the same page! I walk in the door in the evening, I have two dogs and two cats who are lined up like they're waiting for a show to start! It has to be planned. While I am walking, the cats inter-weave between my feet in a figure 8 pattern, one of the dogs follows behind, and the other is ten feet in front running in circles. When I plop down in my chair, all four decend upon me and try to make me feel guilty for leaving them alone all day. That is solidarity!

BENCHWARMERSrUS Says:

Apr 27, 2012 - I don't like those Hermit Crabs. Hahaha

kierantheo Says:

May 1, 2012 - Water buffaloes? Water buffaloes? Really! Those bastards don't even brush their teeth. Rights DENIED! hahahaa

Shopping | prank calls | Wholesale products | english movies | prank calls | proxy | links | prank call

Topfacebookvideos funny arabic videos

Privacy Policy