Niels harrit debunked 3/3

Skeptic121 Says:

Nov 15, 2009 - Excellent explanation!For anyone who cares, it is analogous to instantaneous speed measured by police radar.The cops give tickets for instantaneous speed: at the moment they caught you, you were going 95mph. Maybe you didn't go 95 miles in the last hour, but it doesn't matter. 95 miles in the last hour would tell us your AVERAGE speed, radar (and tickets) are for instantaneous speed.

Skeptic121 Says:

Nov 15, 2009 - The "debunkers" are trying to intimidate the silent doubters into remaining silent.  The over-the-top abuse has a purpose: to show silent doubters what will happen it they speak out. They call doubters "twoofer faggots" and "anti-Semites" and "kook-tards". They spew insults that do even more damage when denied than when hurled. In America, if you can get a man to say "I am NOT anti-Semitic" you end his career. I'm surprised they don't use "pedophile" as an insult.

Physman2011 Says:

Nov 17, 2009 - To skeptic regarding the question of why the acceleration was g for 2.25 seconds but not longer. Perhaps the bottom of the outer shell encountered the ground or internal supports that had not yet collapsed. This is my first inkling at least.

Skeptic121 Says:

Nov 18, 2009 - I agree! In that case we have to explain the event that took out 25 meters of vertical support and did so rapidly and simultaneously all over the base of the facades.

Deanzsyclone Says:

Jan 3, 2010 - Wow, Harrit was sooooo far off base.

Deanzsyclone Says:

Jan 3, 2010 - on pallets, LOL

aburgheim Says:

Jan 4, 2010 - Harrit is not the only scientist and it speaks volumes that a dane is educating the us public how the neocon goons went about to get their war!!Never ever in the history of modern architecture has a fire collapsed a building made with steel frame technology!!The chance that 3 collapse not only within hours but in the same city into their own footprint is astronomical!!The us is on a downward spiral because of lies and greed and the world loves it cause we been treating everyone like shit!!

Skeptic121 Says:

Jan 4, 2010 - Thanks for that contribution to our understanding! I have always wondered if the voltages in the SEM-XEDS were off. What do you think?Have we met at a scientific conference recently?Are you a Mathematica programmer by any chance? It's nice to have someone like you to talk to!

ndjm00 Says:

Apr 8, 2010 - ''Never ever in the history of modern architecture has a fire collapsed a building made with steel frame technology''There is a first time for everything!''The chance that 3 collapse not only within hours but in the same city into their own footprint is astronomical''Skyscrapers are purposefully designed to collapse into their own foot print shoud they loose structural integrity. This is an architectural safety feature... per say!

Algrokoz Says:

Oct 9, 2010 - It remains the ONLY steel-framed building in the history of modern architecture to have complete failure because of a structural fire. That in and of itself deserves investigation.

amphibwarrior0321 Says:

Oct 15, 2010 - THE TOP FLOORS OF THE WINDSOR TOWER COLLAPSED FROM FIRE....NO WEIGHT ON IT, NO STRUCTURAL DAMAGE, NO FUEL.....JUST FIRE

pattoncarter Says:

Oct 20, 2010 - - you seem to be ignoring the impact of the structural damage caused by A FREAKING JUMBO JET FULL OF FUEL FLYING AT MAX SPEED...but you silly Truthers always do.

aburgheim Says:

Nov 22, 2010 - What??

aburgheim Says:

Nov 23, 2010 - Lol and what falsified evidence are you revering to???

Truthseekers09 Says:

Mar 18, 2011 - You think your government Cares for you? Keep kidding yourself

Truthseekers09 Says:

Mar 18, 2011 - You think they care about you? Keep kidding yourself .Wakey wakey people

152czar Says:

May 8, 2011 - lol this video is such a joke. I think rebecca black's video is better lol. she has more thumbs up

JensAngelsgaard Says:

Aug 22, 2011 - You guyz are dumb. To move in tons of explosives undercover was A PIECE OF CAKE for the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. YOU DON'T HAVE A CLUE ABOUT THE REAL WORLD. And by the way I have been a NATO-officer for 8 years.

JensAngelsgaard Says:

Aug 22, 2011 - SIlent explosives? Eeeehhhh no? HUNDREDS OF WITNESSES REPORT OF THE NOISE AND BLASTS FROM EXPLOSIONS - FIREFIGHTERS EMPLOYEES OF THE WTC AND SO FORTH.

rossp3313 Says:

Sep 6, 2011 - hey jariwhose payroll are you oncia, mossad? shin bet?zionist disinforming scumbag!!!!!!

Tazwegian Says:

Sep 18, 2011 - No you haven't, you're just a fag.

josgvis Says:

Oct 10, 2011 - Finally a European scholar who speaks out about the demolition of building 7 and the twin buildings. How in heaven's name can this video have more dislikes than likes, must be due to the ignorant people of Europe.The collapse of buildng 7 wasn't even showed on the european mainstream channels!Sorry europeans, you better wake up..........

kaareaksel Says:

Nov 20, 2011 - I guder... alt er åbenbart en konspiration.. Måske var det Obamas folk der gjorde det, for at gøde jorden for sin valgsejr ? Eller den irakiske oposition for at lokke USA i krig for at få fjernet Sadam ? Eller Kina for at få USA til at gå i krig og gøre sig selv og vesten bankerot så de kunne overtage verdensherredømmet ? Harris hævder iøvrigt at han aldrig havde hørt om WTC 7 før lang tid efter... Som den eneste så han åbenbart ikke TV 9 sept

Thetan1974 Says:

Feb 27, 2012 - Sjove teorier, du har. Det er i hvert fald ikke bevist, al-Qaeda stod bag at flyve flyene eller at fly og brande rev de tre skyskrabere ned.Harrit, og ikke Harris, så i hvert fald ikke bygning 7 d. 9. september. Det kommer så i hvert fald an på, hvilket år, du taler om.Hvis DU så WTC 7 d. 11. sep. 2001, så er du een af de meget, meget få danskere, som gjorde det - måske den eneste. Og det var i hvert fald ikke på en dansk kanal.