BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE

TakeBackAmerica2012 Says:

Apr 29, 2012 - Is it true that Jews who worked in the buildings were told to stay home that day? I heard that there were almost no Jewish people killed yet hundreds worked in the buildings.

buddyfreakinhoIIy Says:

Apr 29, 2012 - The Jews all escaped from the twin towers on blimps that landed on the roofs and then were airbrushed out of the videos by the zionist/CIA/haliburton controlled media.

jcwhite1288 Says:

Apr 30, 2012 - simply because the WHO has yet to be determined, does not mean the HOW is wrong. I wonder what the odds are that BBC "mistakenly" reports something that "know one saw coming" and then it actually does?

TimReed22222 Says:

Apr 30, 2012 - "Know one"??? lolGrammar nit-picking aside, people DID see it coming! The firefighters on the scene began fearing 7 might collapse hours before it did - that's why they evacuated!Did you know several OTHER media reported 7 was expected to come down before it did? True! watch?v=0Guezljq4ysYes, the BBC slipped up & announced it before it happened, but it was widely known it was coming.And they knew because the firefighters TOLD them.

jcwhite1288 Says:

Apr 30, 2012 - doh! That's pretty bad, I'll blame it on the late night.To say that anyone knew that the building was going to collapse is absurd! So you're telling me that the firefighters saw the supports weakened? 2 floors were engulfed, I give you that, but fire doesn't bring a building hurdling to the ground, landing in its own foot print. If a steel structure, failed due to some papers and desks burning, we should definitely stop building with it. A building can burn ENTIRELY and not collapse.

stardelorian Says:

Apr 30, 2012 - but wait!,, the owner of the world trade center took out a billion dollar policy a YEAR before the buildings went down...so yes...your sarcasm LITERALLY speaks the truth Mr. Masses...smfh....

buddyfreakinhoIIy Says:

Apr 30, 2012 - So he leased the complex 2 months before 9/11 but bought insurance a year before when he hadn't even won the bid and didn't even have possession of it. Cool! Good research skills!

stardelorian Says:

May 1, 2012 - did you catch the billion dollar payoff ?...you cant explain that through coincidence...smh...lol...yah...the UK/US gov't is evil dude...and for you to defend it your either naive or youre an agent...smh...

buddyfreakinhoIIy Says:

May 1, 2012 - I'm not defending the UK or US. But if you keep making false statements about them, I'll tell you you're wrong. Just like you got the the timing of the insurance purchase wrong, you're also wrong about the insurance payout to Silverstein Properties and the PANY. It wasn't $1 billion. It was $4.6 billion and it's all going to rebuilding. You're the one who is either naive or an agent.

stardelorian Says:

May 1, 2012 - lol hahaha, spoken like a true agent

lunarchirppingbug Says:

May 1, 2012 - How did building 7 get weakened?  Wasn't building 6 in between them? It was a controlled implosion. There were documents in building 7 that would have implicated enron and other rich assholes. The whole thing is/was an inside job. The pentagon was hit by a missile too. This is all bullshit. The truth needs to be known.

buddyfreakinhoIIy Says:

May 1, 2012 - Don't be sore just cuz you got some things wrong. What did I get wrong? If you have some good info sources, what are they?

TimReed22222 Says:

May 2, 2012 - "Seven ... had taken a big hit from the north tower. When it fell, it ripped steel out from between the third and sixth floors across the facade on Vesey Street. We were concerned that the fires on several floors and the missing steel would result in the building collapsing." --FDNY Chief Frank Fellini

stardelorian Says:

May 2, 2012 - i better stop talking, you might get your American/Euro racist elitist zionist faggots colleague to assassinate me... :O

dionstrezlecki Says:

May 9, 2012 - wtf so your saying it goes all the way back to enron?

OpaLangBein11 Says:

May 11, 2012 - Look at 8:38 you can see the explosions

newsmanbluesman Says:

May 16, 2012 - @quartermickAnchor - anchor - anchor. It is the Wshington desk, not Ms Standley, that has been improperly told of collapse!Please people - learn how to watch TV news, and realize, this is what the serfs called a dead giveaway in Python Holy Grail.Ms Standley provides death toll of - ready - 50,0000. Why? - because no evacuations observed at Towers or bldg 7.She's also 50 per cent high on passenger numbers.Imagine the hurdle for Alternate CT argument were deaths this numerous.

Kristopful Says:

May 16, 2012 - Oops.!! This reminds me of the 7/7 bombings in "London". All the so called teen. "torrorists" movements were documented from train station, to train station & recorded on numerous cameras. All this data was released as fact.? But then it was revealed that the "1st TRAIN" that they had supposedly got on....never arrived.?? IT BROKE DOWN. So the whole story was rendered BullShit. This is fact. It's called the "ghost train". Look it up. This fact woke a lot of ppl up to an uncomfortable reality.

stelley08 Says:

May 19, 2012 - what do the official story followers (if any) think about this video?

ThePurpPuffer Says:

May 20, 2012 - Government did this.

TheMostAwesomeMan242 Says:

May 21, 2012 - how can the people at BBC be so fucking retarded?!!! it's fucking right there!!!! dumb bitch!!!! goddamn!!!! no wonder why people love making fun of british people cause thise was the most retarded report ever!!!!

soulcase1 Says:

May 24, 2012 - you cant mistakenly report that building 7 would collapse like 20 mintues before it did, no one could of predicted that it would collapse, theres probably more chance of winning the lottery than making that mistake, not only that they reported that it wasn't a new attack, but that the building had been weakened by damage earlier in the day, BEFORE IT HAD COLLAPSED, getting the official story in there right from the start, the BBC is an extension of the tavistock institute... peace