If you like the video, share it with your friends on these social sites:

 

Title: 9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center "Plane Missiles" Explained

Added: Aug 21, 2007

Author: RKOwens4

Duration: 2:29

Description:
Debunking every single 9/11 conspiracy theory, one at a time.

Related Videos:

Videos related to '9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center "Plane Missiles" Explained'

Channel: News

Tags: wtc  flight  11  175  pod  missile  flash  belly  conspiracy  theory  theories  debunk 



wtc  flight  11  175  pod  missile  flash  belly  conspiracy  theory  theories  debunk 

Youtube Comments: 9036

GuyNAustin Says:

Jan 13, 2012 - Aluminum airplanes cannot slice through structural steel and concrete as if it were paper mache. Secondly, your claim of 490 MPH and 590 MPH is totally laughable. It's physically impossible for those planes to travel at those speeds at sea level.The maximum speed for those aircraft at sea level would max out at about 330-350 MPH, so the entire story is a fairytale for children and those who know nothing about aircraft.

shananagans5 Says:

Jan 14, 2012 - lol Max speed of 330-350 MPH at sea level? Where do you get that idea? They didn't slice through like paper mache. The exterior walls weren't all that strong & the main structure was deep inside the building which tore the jet to ribbons.

basketballplayer182 Says:

Jan 15, 2012 - Maybe haha. We'll see what happens next in the world.

pocomedy Says:

Jan 16, 2012 - very nice

Breezer1391 Says:

Jan 16, 2012 - so your saying they fly faster higher up with thinner air? ... oh dear oh dear you lack of basic understanding is pretty telling. Yes as you probably realise less air resistance the high you go = faster potential, but when your that high the thrust also loses air to push against so they must work harder to maintain speed.Not to mention be quite. You do as much damage to civilisation as religious nuts ... grrrr just watch something that ISNT Zeitgeist ... please!

richard20bris Says:

Jan 17, 2012 - when you say "the real world" I take it you are not referring to the BBC, CNN, Reuters, and every other reputable news organisation....along with every reputable scientific and engineering journal in existence...the Encyclopedia Britannica, historians at every major university in the world, and so on...Face the facts - you Twuthers have zero credibility, except amongst yourselves (although even then you all can't decide whether they were military planes or holograms).

cptfunkstar Says:

Jan 17, 2012 - What the fuck is a "Twuther"?? If your going to portray intellect......learn how to spell first!

roquefortfiles Says:

Jan 18, 2012 - They're all on glue. I have lost count (Seriously) to how many times i enter in to debate with these whackadoos, go to check out their home page, and 9 times out of 10 it will have some loony "Manifesto" statement on the world and their completely paranoid view of it. I mean how many people join Youtube and put in their description a 4 paragraph statement on Sept 11th or conspiracies. ?? Its more than a little "ODD".YT manifesto? Odd!!

roquefortfiles Says:

Jan 18, 2012 - Yaaaaaaay!!  someone with a brain and some intelligence!!

roquefortfiles Says:

Jan 18, 2012 - so the entire story is a fairytale for children and those who know nothing about aircraft. Really? In 1945 a B25 flew thru the side of the Empire State Building. It accomplished this at 1/10th the mass of a 767. The ESB is a cement, columned fortress in comparison to the WTC which though large is a very lightly built structure and about 90% simply ... AIR. A 767 is 10x heavier, moving 3x faster. We are talking 100s of times the force.

roquefortfiles Says:

Jan 18, 2012 - The maximum speed for those aircraft at sea level would max out at about 330-350 MPH, so the entire story is a fairytale for children and those who know nothing about aircraft.Friend of mine flies a 767. 30 year veteran. I asked him this question. His reply..."The altitude has no bearing on the engine performance, i could fly the plane at full speed at 100 feet i wanted. The plane is very capable of those speeds"..You were saying???

kingindeed Says:

Jan 20, 2012 - Thank You!

Disdain4Lies Says:

Jan 21, 2012 - I WOULD LIKE TO SAY MY SON RYAN KYLE OWENS IS PAID TO MAKE THESE VIDEOS AND POST THEM ON YOUTUBEJust wondering if this story is real. Never seen you post a comment anywhere to respond to this post, or any other. Would you kindy direct me where I can glean wisdom from your immeasurable mind? In your vast library of 6 fav's & 61 loads of lard I saw no dynamic dialogue or deep diagnosis from one so learned in all aspects of just who harbours the pearls of knowledge about the new Pearl Harbor.

Scumbot404 Says:

Jan 21, 2012 - 757 and 767 are capable to fly over 500 mph at sea level. Period. Their engines are that powerful. The wings and the fuselage will start to get damages if the jet plane flies like 450-500 mps at low altitudes but it doesnt happen immediatelly. If the pilot would've set the plane to dive at full throttle then the plane mostlikely would've been teared apart b4 getting even close to the tower.

MrAwsome514 Says:

Jan 21, 2012 - He was typing it as if it was spoken with a lisp... to further the insult. He does know how truther is spelled but many choose to spell it this way as a means of demonstrating exactly how "seriously" they take you. Which is not very seriously at all obviously, and for good reason.

mrh785 Says:

Jan 22, 2012 - JUST FYI, THE USER KNOWN AS cantonear1968 IS A KNOWN SHILL. HE'S ON THESE 9/11 PAGES SPREADING DISINFORMATION ABOUT THE EVENTS OF 9/11/01. LIKE OTHER SHILLS HE CLAIMS TO BE AN "EXPERT", IN THIS CASE A FORMER "NAVIGATOR" FOR THE AIR FORCE. HE IS 100% FULL OF CRAP & CAN'T BE TAKEN AT HIS WORD. HE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A DISINFORMATION PUSHER. HE WILL ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT ANY RESEARCH & RESEARCHERS NOT IN SUPPORT OF THE OFFICIAL STORY & WILL ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT THE TRUTH MOVEMENT AS A WHOLE.

ali51999 Says:

Jan 22, 2012 - fuck u thats all the proof you have

djsicizzum Says:

Jan 24, 2012 - yer All A bunch of fucktArds! whAt is the point of shooting A missle into A building thAt your flying A huge plAne into! there's no need for A missle!good observAtion trAilergod

NO0Bstatus Says:

Jan 25, 2012 - you wouldn't need a single missile to help that plan get into the tower. a 757 going 500 mph that has hundreds of fuel on board would do the trick

Christianqcs Says:

Jan 26, 2012 - explain the nanothermite and the blackboxes and then gain some respect.

MrNoblemanoflove Says:

Jan 27, 2012 - In my dream, the Plaza is packed, people in every direction as far as the eye can see. All highways into Dallas are clogged with cars, and millions of people have left them, now walking to Dealy with JFK & 911 signs to be there for the Nov. 22, 50 year shakeup. The whole world watches in awe, as now, all roads into Texas are parking lots..and then a chemtrail tanker fleet doses them with vallium and prozac....they forget why they came....and go home & watch the "nooz

cantonear1968 Says:

Jan 29, 2012 - Nonothermite wasn't found.The black boxes were found for FLs 77 and 93, though the VDR for 77 was inoperable.The black boxes were not found for FLs 11 and 175.What else do you need explained?

Inigo37 Says:

Jan 31, 2012 - JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA: 9/11 WAS A FRAUD:Leslie Raphael, Serendipity.li

Disdain4Lies Says:

Feb 1, 2012 - RKO plainly maintains... "PLANEly Misses ExPLANEing"...inane...There comes a time, when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't part, not even passively take part, and you've got to put your bodies upon the gears, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop.Goes for the warmongering dupes, AND you 9/11 Liars....

Shopping | prank calls | Wholesale products | english movies | prank calls | proxy | links | prank call

Topfacebookvideos funny arabic videos

Privacy Policy