Tony Szamboti, M.E. - Mechanical Engineer

chronotek2009 Says:

May 19, 2011 - n.i.s.t are another bunch of criminals that need to go to jail, all of them are no different to hitler. the only reason they wont investigate and cover this up it cause there guilty.

tippohat Says:

May 19, 2011 - I wonder did anyone ask Stephen Hawking what he thinks about it?

danp5648 Says:

May 19, 2011 - I believe the cores at the basement level where cut before the plane distracted onlookers using cutting shape charges.

Tsutomu6 Says:

May 20, 2011 - I read Bazants paper too. And it doesn't require a rocket scientist, to understand that (even though he has a degree in engineering) what he wrote is bs.Steel of any type remains a ductile material and when heatet, this increases. Not worth to mention for him, because he is busy talking about "inabsorbable energy". Of course he has to, because we don't see any absorbtion of energy at all.

cobra60six Says:

May 22, 2011 - Good work Mr Szamboti, no one will sleep easy till this charade is exposed and all these terrorist scum are strung up.

twg20101 Says:

May 22, 2011 - What ever abuot the twin towers, the biggest mystery is the downing of building 7, a 42 story building that was not struck by any plane

realcddeal Says:

May 22, 2011 - WTC 7 was a 47 story building which was 610 feet tall where each floor was the size of a football field. It had 75% of the floor space of the Empire State building, so it was enormous. It had 82 very large columns and yet came down across the full length and width of the building in full freefall acceleration for over 100 feet.or about 8 stories.The fact that charges had to be pre-positioned in WTC 7 lends credence to the fact that they were probably in the towers also.

NellJSmith Says:

May 22, 2011 - Quote: "The fact that charges had to be pre-positioned in WTC 7 lends credence to the fact that they were probably in the towers also."Well said, and a point I have been trying to make for a while. Only a determined anti-Truther would deny that WTC7 was anything but a classic CD. *But* in order to be able to blame WTC7's collapse on "damage from the Towers' collapse", the Towers *had* to collapse FIRST, or else no debris would have been present. Obvious conclusion: CD of Towers.

ed11561 Says:

May 23, 2011 - 47 story not 42

ed11561 Says:

May 23, 2011 - About time all these architects or engineers or specialists have been recorded saying the government lies are bullshit.

hunkydoryorder Says:

May 23, 2011 - I have only one Question..Where is your disguise? and your cape ?In awe.. One spectacularly concise run down from a true professional.Analysis is Mr. Szamboti's super power.The mutt's nuts !

EGRJ Says:

May 24, 2011 - The debris from WTC 1, 2, and 7 hit other buildings. That, by definition, is not "straight down". WTC 7 fell across a 4-lane street and hit Fiterman Hall and the Verizon Building. I'm not sure what definition of a "classic CD" you're using.Your argument is a textbook Affirming the Consequent. "They needed to CD the towers to have an excuse for 7 so they CD'd the towers, QED."

EGRJ Says:

May 24, 2011 - The mixture that has never, ever, been proven to exist. Nor has any testing of such a mixture on any scale close to that of WTC 7, much less the TT, ever been proven to have been taken place.Do you know how hard and conspicuous it is to strip hundreds of columns on multiple floors in an occupied office building?

danosthemano Says:

May 25, 2011 - any body that believes the official story is a moron. and should move to china ! Our founding fathers are turning in there graves. WAKE UP AMERICA! DEMAND TRUTH!

GruesomeTruth Says:

May 27, 2011 - Mr. Szamboti calmly nailed numerous points, calling into serious question the pathetic investigation done by NIST.Excellent research and solid presentation of multiple reasons why a new & independent investigation must be performed--one with Subpoena Power.

GruesomeTruth Says:

May 27, 2011 - @EGRJThe vast bulk of WTC7 did indeed collapse straight down, doing shockingly Little damage to nearby buildings.You can clearly see from multiple videos that WTC7 fell straight down for approx 3/4 of its collapse, and only in the final second or two did it finally start to tilt in the direction of WTC1 & 2--thus towards buildings Already heavily damaged by debris from each of the Twin Towers.

EGRJ Says:

May 28, 2011 - You've changed your claim from "all of 7" to "the bulk of 7".Fiterman Hall was effectively destroyed by the damage. Tthere was a hole in the building from the roof to the ground.The only building in the direction of WTC 1/2 was WTC 6, which was destroyed by the same collapse that set 7 ablaze. FH and the VB are to the North and West of 7, respectively. In other words, AWAY from WTC 1, 2, and 6.bit ly/11vMJ4

EGRJ Says:

May 28, 2011 - By the way, was the Towers' collapse aimed towards 7 so They'd have debris hit it to give Them an excuse for the collapse?

GruesomeTruth Says:

May 29, 2011 - @EGRJI never stated 'all of 7'.You say WTC7 was 'ablaze'? -if 7 was 'ablaze' then what do you call it when a skyscraper has more than a few floors with fires? If a building is 'ablaze' it means most or all of the building is clearly on fire--Not the case with 7.Why waste your precious time here?The official conspiracy story certainly doesn't need help.. unless you're worried that it does?Is it not enough major media support the official version?Sure you have better things to do.

Funkadelic2 Says:

Jun 3, 2011 - Folks, it IS important that you show your sympathy with those seeking a new investigation, but it is important too, to really sign the petitions actually demanding a new, real, IMPARTIAL investigation:w w w 2.ae911truth. org/signpetition. p h pThank you.

sananda2012 Says:

Jun 15, 2011 - Mr. Szamboti seemed annoyingly aloof in the first five minutes, by the ten minute mark he'd presented enough inconsistencies about the NIST report to begin comprehending why and 20 minutes in I felt sorely that this intelligent man had to waste his time examining what a 7th grader would probably have done better. The NIST report is an insult to American academia and a twisting barbed dagger in the heart of the survivors who have sought truth from day one. Many thanks, Mr. Tony Szamboti!

ThoughtCrime7 Says:

Sep 8, 2011 - inside job

madderthanalex Says:

Sep 14, 2011 - Now I see that the correct exposure of information regarding the collapse of 3 buildings.Thus it follows that when the evidence becomes clearly overwhelming& on the verge of becoming known to billions of people world wide,that the nextevent on the near horizon must be a similar 911 event, but at least 10x in magnitude so as to massively DISTRACT from the uncovering of the TRUTH of the1st EVENT - " 911 ". My guess is a " Lone Wolf style attack ", using a Dirty Nuclear Bomb. Maybe Chicago!

demerc Says:

Jan 3, 2012 - Guys, I am not naive.I know what sociopaths are capable of, but for this to have been planned by the Gov,with controlled demolition,is a level of evil and organization so incredibly monumental,i think to rely on it deters people from the ultimate truth which is that the level of evil of our current lifestyle is so insidious and seemingly innocuous and convoluted, that it involves every single one of us.It's a lot harder and unromantic pill to swallow, than something of this magnitude.