Nano-thermite took down the WTC?

Sandberg1972 Says:

Jan 30, 2012 - And u've really outdone urself with this next jewel:"The fact that a building fell due to fire is "proof" it is possible for a building to fall due to fire"Somebody nominate this guy 4 a medal please. This is brilliant!!!I'm not going to say anything else, I just leave the audience to stare and wonder at your baffling ignorance of science.U might as well have said: the fact that WTC7 fell because of a mousefart is proof that it's possible to fail due to a mousefart

eatwoodman Says:

Jan 30, 2012 - It's okay, you obviously haven't even taken a college level science class. You probably haven't even graduated high school yet, it's okay bro. I love how so many conspiracy theorists are in high school and think they know more than professionals who have studied for many years.

Sandberg1972 Says:

Jan 31, 2012 - I'm just saying you should be awarded a medal for your "remarkable" opinions, especially that one from your second to last post. Lemme show this again folks:"The fact that a building fell due to fire is "proof" it is possible for a building to fall due to fire"Bravo! Well done kid. U get an A+ for outright stupidity.Just like those engineers at NIST, who tried to cover it all up in 1000's of pages of boring data & statistics, endless graphs & illustrations. TNRAT u know.

NothingAtAllXD Says:

Feb 2, 2012 - RT is the new mainstream. The American ones don't even stand a chance. At least they give these people a chance instead of brushing them off with cliche, misnomers.

TheSpiritof1969 Says:

Feb 4, 2012 - a hundred tons of thermite? LOL that is an awful lot of WHITE SMOKE.

ctcole77 Says:

Feb 12, 2012 - Let's cut through these 911 twoofer lies.First off,WTC 7 DID NOT COLLAPSE AT FREEFALL! I suppose thousands of tons of concrete and steel falling hundreds of feet on WTC 7 had NOTHING to do with the collapse? How about the 30 foot hole in WTC 7's facade? How about the southwest corner of WTC 7 chopped off? Please explain firefighters predicting WTC 7's collapse HOURS ahead? 911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN

ctcole77 Says:

Feb 12, 2012 - Let's cut through these 911 twoofer lies.First off,WTC 7 DID NOT COLLAPSE AT FREEFALL!I suppose thousands of tons of concrete and steel falling hundreds of feet on WTC 7 had NOTHING to do with the collapse?How about the 30 foot hole in WTC 7's facade?How about the southwest corner of WTC 7 chopped off?Please explain firefighters predicting WTC 7's collapse HOURS ahead?911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN

Sandberg1972 Says:

Feb 14, 2012 - Keep it going dude.U sound really convincing, really, u do.And by all means, why don't YOU explain how firefighters could've predicted WTC7's collapse hourse in advance. Give it ur best shot, OK?

ctcole77 Says:

Feb 14, 2012 - @Sandberg1972- Lt William Ryan FDNY"Then we found out, I guess around 3:00, that they thought 7 was going to collapse. So, of course, [we've] got guys all in this pile over here and the main concern was get everybody out, and I guess it took us over an hour and a half, two hours to get everybody out of there. The heat must have been tremendous. There was so much [expletive] fire there. This whole pile was burning like crazy."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

ctcole77 Says:

Feb 14, 2012 - @Sandberg1972"WTC Building 7 appears to have suffered significant damage at some point after the WTC Towers had collapsed, according to firefighters at the scene. Firefighter Butch Brandies tells other firefighters that nobody is to go into Building 7 because of creaking and noises coming out of there. [Firehouse Magazine, 8/02]According to Deputy Chief Peter Hayden, there is a bulge in the southwest corner of the building between floors 10 and 13. [Firehouse Magazine, 4/02]

ctcole77 Says:

Feb 14, 2012 - Deputy Chief Nick Visconti also later recalls recounts, "A big chunk of the lower floors had been taken out on the Vesey Street side." Captain Chris Boyle recalls, "On the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors." [Firehouse Magazine, 8/02]911 TRUTH DEBUNKED (3rd time)!

VD420herpes Says:

Feb 16, 2012 - You do know that the other buildings were damaged more than building 7 was right? You do know that even NIST agreed and confirmed that bldg 7 fell at free fall (no resistance) for at least 8 stories, right? Of course you do. And the one thing that I always notice about people who call truthers twoofers, it they completely dismiss the info in the video they're commenting on! It hurts and is difficult to admit to one's self they've been decieved. But necessary. peace.

VD420herpes Says:

Feb 16, 2012 - "professionals who have studied for many years." - ya, like the guy in this video! Shanksville PA - no fucking plane - NIST confirms WTC7 freefall collapse (no resistance) for 8 stories,but fail or refused to explain how - it's even stated in this video (along with being true) that it is normal procedure to check for explosives. NIST did not. Being in highschool doesn't make someone an idiot, believing something blindly does. peace.

CCentral Says:

Feb 25, 2012 - He sounds illiterate, lol he said pure bullshit

ctcole77 Says:

Mar 3, 2012 - @Sandberg1972Did you hear yet gullible shill?Your precious "thermite dust samples" were finally tested by a non-911 twoofer scientist."There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite."Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific Consultants, February 28, 2012911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

TheSpiritof1969 Says:

Mar 11, 2012 - Frankly I think he is talking bullshit from start to finish. There was NO thermite and because some fool said there was does not make it true. All they found was traces of aluminium and iron oxide in the rubble ... hardly surprising was it.There was no evidence at all of explosives being used, nothing found in the rubble, no trace of wires or tubing that would be associated with a very complicated detonation ... nothing.

DDentonas Says:

Mar 11, 2012 - Short answer: No.Long answer: Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

13falls123 Says:

Mar 19, 2012 - Nanothermite? Uh, no. It turns out to be primer paint.

snillocekim Says:

Apr 8, 2012 - lol are you people really that dense? they found and tested those chips with x-ray spectrography. they are a sol-gel based polymer with nano aluminum and iron oxide particles bond in layers....its a patented type of nano-thermate. it would be quiet and able to cut the 4-inch-thick core columns, so all that would be needed to collapse the building would be to use the conventional high explosives on the exterior 'wheat chex' to make it look like it was collapsing. please do research.

snillocekim Says:

Apr 8, 2012 - and that guy is a famous materials scientist. you people are retarded! go read some of the research before you desperately have to cling back to your fox-news recited fables

VedderFAN100 Says:

Apr 9, 2012 - no

lijebaley01 Says:

Apr 9, 2012 - Sure, except in Harrit's paper, the red parts of the chips contain no aluminum as seen in their XEDS maps from the chip shown in figure 13. The gray part is steel, the red part is paint. Can you imagine the thermite set up necessary to explode through one girder? Now do it on every floor on every third exterior column. So tell us, who is dense?

riflemanjim Says:

Apr 17, 2012 - this guy is full of crap

snillocekim Says:

Apr 17, 2012 - the thermite could not 'explode' it would simpy release its chemical energy in the form of heat melting the supports...well thats how they use conventional thermite and thermate. look up the patents for the nano-thermite...they are available..

snillocekim Says:

May 3, 2012 - why would they use wires? you dumb fucks...they have wireless detonators....why dont you guys read some fucking books...they found nano thermite chips which they reacted..obviously none of you tards major in phyiscs...read some fucking books before you dismiss everything as a 'theory'...hah..