|
|
|
|
Title: Jonas Gahr Støre: In defense of dialogue
Added: Jan 11, 2012
Author: TEDtalksDirector
Duration: 14:59
Description:
http://www.ted.com In politics, it seems counterintuitive to engage in dialogue with violent groups, with radicals and terrorists, and with the states that support them. But Jonas Gahr Støre, the foreign minister of Norway, makes a compelling case for open discussion, even when values diverge, in an attempt to build greater security for all.TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes. Featured speakers have included Al Gore on climate change, Philippe Starck on design, Jill Bolte Taylor on observing her own stroke, Nicholas Negroponte on One Laptop per Child, Jane Goodall on chimpanzees, Bill Gates on malaria and mosquitoes, Pattie Maes on the "Sixth Sense" wearable tech, and "Lost" producer JJ Abrams on the allure of mystery. TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design, and TEDTalks cover these topics as well as science, business, development and the arts. Closed captions and translated subtitles in a variety of languages are now available on TED.com, at http://www.ted.com/translateIf you have questions or comments about this or other TED videos, please go to http://support.ted.com
Related Videos:
Videos related to 'Jonas Gahr Støre: In defense of dialogue'
Channel: News
Tags: jonas gahr støre jonas gahr store tedxrc2 norway culture politics dialogue ted tedtalks tedtalk ted talk ted talks
jonas gahr støre jonas gahr store tedxrc2 norway culture politics dialogue ted tedtalks tedtalk ted talk ted talks
Youtube Comments: 189
Knaragus Says:
Jan 16, 2012 - Oh, btwPetter solberg + vocabulary = Jonas Gahr Støre
eroceanos Says:
Jan 16, 2012 - Who set up the armed rebels, I wonder?
Eetaq Says:
Jan 16, 2012 - We did. Feb 17th was declared via facebook as the day to go out and protest. The facebook group had 100,000 people on it, and on Feb 15th the earliest protests began. By the 17th, the slaughter had begun. If Gaddafi had decided to listen, and not to slaughter, things may have gone differently.
Eetaq Says:
Jan 16, 2012 - Wrong. It's because Gaddafi supporters continued resisting until he was killed. After Gaddafi was killed, the shelling of Sirte stopped. If they didn't want their city destroyed, they could have stopped killing in Gaddafi's name.
Eetaq Says:
Jan 16, 2012 - Anwar al Awlaki was an american citizen, assassinated. All those Taliban drone attacks are assassinations. Who is the idiot?
tantzer Says:
Jan 16, 2012 - If you accept the idea of destroying civilian cities, that is your choice: so did Qaddafi. But my point is that it shows that NATO's claim was a lie: NATO was not there to protect civilian areas from destruction: NATO's aim was to change the regime. NATO didn't care that the new Libyan government shelled Sirte for three weeks, destroying every building in it.
tantzer Says:
Jan 16, 2012 - The Talk's Bottom-line: We should talk to the US even though it's a rogue, terrorist state.
lukaskoube Says:
Jan 16, 2012 - Vote Ron Paul, Get A Free Country!
ThisIsMyUserNameVT Says:
Jan 17, 2012 - You have oil because the guy representing Denmark, that had to discuss who gets what, was drunk :(
Eetaq Says:
Jan 19, 2012 - Ok. So what? As Nietzsche said, lying in and of itself is neither moral nor immoral. Only the repurcussions of a lie can be moral or immoral. Telling a lie that earns your friend his dream job is a moral act. Telling a lie that gets rid of a ruthless tyrant is also a moral act. And I thank NATO for that lie, because that's what it took to get China and Russia to abstain from veto.
husnainanwaar1992 Says:
Jan 22, 2012 - i am from ksa
kanarinakimou Says:
Jan 27, 2012 - κι εμεις τετοιους πολιτικους εχουμε... :P
nataliabutor Says:
Feb 1, 2012 - We should use words insted of guns
Faerlon123 Says:
Feb 2, 2012 - The most important point he makes here though, is that talking is not the same as endorsing, or agreeing. One of the huge failures of American foreign policy in my opinion, is that they never talk to anyone they don't like, or agree with. Talking and having a discussion about certain topics might help solve alot of issues. Like Cuba for instance. They never talk to Cuba, now some 40 years after the Cold War. It's shameful.
sallybaker1950 Says:
Feb 5, 2012 - Sometimes it's good to talk to people because that's how you find out it useless because their world view is so distorted. You find their dellusions, you find their vulnerabilities. and you exploit them to your ends. Internal conflicts often prevent external conflicts. Iran was in the middle of a civil war, no one would worried aout a nuclear program. Talking through a problem only works on people that can reluctantly tolerate coexistanceIsreal has always been willing to talk.
SOSTacoJohnson Says:
Feb 19, 2012 - its funny cus all you morons probably still think u run your democracies. LOL you simpletons. Not even worth the ground you sit over. You think countries invade other countries with the intention of settling disputes? The idea is to start them. Only in rare instances such as the iraq invasion of kuwait was war used to settle a dispute. Everything since has been a power grab. You fucking morons.
Ighart Says:
Feb 19, 2012 - 30 idiots.
Oskoreii Says:
Feb 23, 2012 - I am, right now, a little proud to be norwegian :]
Norwegiian Says:
Mar 3, 2012 - Haha, funny. If you by sensibile mean a naive fuck that wants to import a million muslims and regulate your life to the fullest you're right.
TheEcoApe Says:
Mar 5, 2012 - Frp konservativ på sitt verste much? Finn én mer velinformert, mer verdensvandt, mer konstruktiv, målrettet og effektiv person. Vanskelig om ikke umulig.
TheSet271 Says:
Mar 6, 2012 - He is the smartest diplomat I've seen/heard in a very long time. It's obvious he's not puppet-ed from behind by a corporation. He talks about the DE-humanizing of the Palestinians by Israel and that is the main problem that everyone is turning their heads from...at the very least allowing others to turn their heads' for them. Israel must be stopped, the Palestinians weren't the way they are today, Israel made them into terrorists. Both figuratively and literally.
youartoyube Says:
Mar 17, 2012 - no, it's ron paul!
djribz Says:
Apr 1, 2012 - This gentleman is a sick individual. He has countless lives on his conscience and a great, but very expensive PR-team.
cbradsmith1 Says:
May 1, 2012 - army's cant destroy terrorist only create them ! make it illegal for politicians to lie and war will begone forever












Knaragus Says:
Jan 16, 2012 - Typical norwegian politic - Talk, discuss and make compomises of ideas - Well it works, BECAUS WE HAVE OIL! :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D