George Carlin - Pro-Life is Anti-Woman!

expertstrategy Says:

May 26, 2012 - The fetus is already a human being even before the birth, even if the fetus does not have all of the physical features, it still has the life of a human.That is the best answer I can give you.

Xuldarinar Says:

May 26, 2012 - Your point is valid, ignoring your previous definition. But now I ask, why are we debating on this?

expertstrategy Says:

May 26, 2012 - Honeslty, I don't even know why we are even doing this. I guess I got a little bored and I was in the mood for a harmless argument. LOL. See you my man.

expertstrategy Says:

May 26, 2012 - I think it's best we stop this. I invite you to come on over and watch this video I made about one of Napoleon's Marshals. I think you'll enjoy it.

MIXEDUPTHROWNTOGETHR Says:

May 26, 2012 - i put the christians and homosexuals not having abortions part as my status on facebook. my super-christian friends were somehow offended.......... fuck them this is funny and true

zenoist2 Says:

May 26, 2012 - You 2 should bury the hatchet.I use to argue with expertstategy about Napoleon.It was a bit childish really.Expert seems a decent and good man.He never gets nasty or insulting about anything unlike a lot of YTers and I can respect that.Were pretty much friends now, he has his views and I have mine though.

cowskater5 Says:

May 26, 2012 - thats fucking funny

Sueezee2 Says:

May 26, 2012 - expert says: The fetus is already a human being even before the birth, That is the best answer I can give you~~~~~~~~~~~ Youre "best answer" is BS! A fetus is NOT a human of being, if it were ,abortion would be illegal. Its illegal to kill persons/human beings at will. Learn the legal def of human being.

Sueezee2 Says:

May 26, 2012 - Xuld says: So when does it become human?~~~~~~~~~~ Dont let expertstrategy fool you. A human fetus is always of the... human species, its human... Get it?

Sueezee2 Says:

May 26, 2012 - expert says: fetus has the eyes, nose, mouth, hands, fingers, limbs, lungs, hearts—these are not the features of a sperm or egg at all. A born child isn't any different than a fetus~~~~~~~~~~~ Shove your science. This is ONLY about rights of people,the law, the 5th, 9th, 13th, & 14th Amend.,The Universal Dec. of Human Rights, The Supreme Court, social custom & necessity, Roe v. Wade & NO SCIENCE

Sueezee2 Says:

May 26, 2012 - expert says: It's considered to a double homicide if the mom and fetus die from intent murder.~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thats NOT because the fetus is considered a human being or a person with rights.

Sueezee2 Says:

May 26, 2012 - exoert says: Human also means any member of the homo sapien race~~~~~~~~~~~~LMAO...thats JUST what I told YOU!! hahaha, good god expert, take alittle pride in yourslef & the things you say! Your reading comprehension is indeed abysmal

Sueezee2 Says:

May 26, 2012 - expert says: Human also means any member of the homo sapien race, it didn't say you have to be born in order to become a human~~~~~~~~~~~ Youre right. if a women miscarried a pregnancy on the sidewalk & authorites wanted to know what it was...they could tell is was the contents of a HUMAN preganacy..... So, whats your point now typer???LOL

oXmoonshineXo Says:

May 26, 2012 - 1. "Choice always ends the life of a human being" That statement is wrong on two accounts a) So if I chose vanilla ice-cream over chocolate, I just ended someones life? b) A choice is just that, you can CHOOSE to get an abortion or you can choose not to2. Parasite-an organism that lives in or on another organism and benefits by deriving nutrients, not necessarily harmful3. A fetus is not yet a human, its not a human until it is no longer a parasite, when it can survive outside of the mother.

oXmoonshineXo Says:

May 26, 2012 - Type in 'was reincarnation removed from the bible' on google, click the first link, that is where I got the quote. Do some other research yourself, you will find that there have been things that were changed over the years.When the bible was translated from Latin, exact translations didn't match so some things were changed then.I don't know why you can't just accept that you're wrong, because I've fact-checked my information...

expertstrategy Says:

May 26, 2012 - "Thats NOT because the fetus is considered a human being or a person with rights." please explain why you think so.

oXmoonshineXo Says:

May 26, 2012 - No, I meant exactly what I said, I chose my words carefully. Yes, we were all parasites at one time, feeding off our mother's body. How is it degrading to the woman? I was once a parasite, all mammals were, anything not hatched from an egg fed off of their mother, their host."the special nature of man" what do you mean by that?

Xuldarinar Says:

May 26, 2012 - I was using his logic to prove a point.

expertstrategy Says:

May 26, 2012 - It's scientifically incorrect to deem the fetus as a parasite, if that were the case, then children are technically "parasites" too since they must solely rely upon their parents for food, support, shelter. etc...Some grown adults are that way too. When the baby does survive out of the mother, it makes no difference because the child still must be taken care of anyway at the expense of the parent or parents.

expertstrategy Says:

May 26, 2012 - A parasite must be of a different species to be considered as such and it must do some actual harm to the host. I have never heard of a parasite that was created out of sex between two members of the same species. That itself is stupid.A flea, tick, mosquito, etc...are all foreign to the host and they all do harm. A parasite is defined as an organism of one species living in or on an organism of another species (a heterospecific relationship) and deriving its nourishment from the host.

TheTIUHipster Says:

May 26, 2012 - you went to the first link on google and you believe that you "fact-checked" your information? is this where this country is going? that is pathetic. one link in google is enough to change your mind? do you believe in Spongebob Squarepants and unicorns? Goodness

liveinjoy11 Says:

May 26, 2012 - No you never should have become pregnant in the first place. Women need to be more responsible with thier reproductive abilities. It is not just an inconvience, it is a life.

Eeban93 Says:

May 27, 2012 - ru fucking stupid?!!WOMEN?!??! WOMEN??! right coz a woman can just get pregant by herself, yes.NOO!! u fucking moron?!!men have reproductive abilities as well bitch so why arnt u saying anything about that huh??!! bitchi bet that if men can get pregant this fucking argument wouldnt exist in the first place.just go die in a hole u stupid fuck

liveinjoy11 Says:

May 27, 2012 - No I am not going to go die in a hole. Nor will I resort to your foul language. Yes men do have reproductive capabilities too and women dont get pregnant by themselves. But women's bodies are the ones that get pregnant. We women do want control over ourselves, our bodies. So therefore we need to be responsible with what we allow to happen to ourselves.

mixmastermeeks Says:

May 27, 2012 - Roger that. But if it is completely up to the woman if she has a baby no man should ever have to pay child support, after all it was completely her decision to have the baby in the first place.