Michael Moore Vs Elisabeth Hasselbeck On Osama Bin Laden

meaturama Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - You're the one making baseless accusations. Either provide proof or you're just a nut conspiracy theorist who doesn't deserve attentions. Murder has been a crime since civilisation began please provide evidence that its legal to kill jews and the handicapped in nazi germany as opposed to other races.

GetSum951 Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - Well, your argument has no merits whatsoever (as the evidence has been shown to be overwhelming) ... except you do seem to have a propensity for understanding what it is like to live in a fantasy land.

GetSum951 Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - Actually, if she'd have buck teeth, wonky eyes and acne, Elisabeth then would have been a Liberal and there would have been no argument ... so your point is moot.

historypoliticsbb Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - My argument has 'no merits whatsoever'?If there was overwhelming evidence that Bin Laden was involved in 9/11 I would have thought the FBI would accused him of it on his page n their website. They did not.Show me one piece of evidence demonstrating his involvement. It would be one piece more than the US government ever produced.This should be good.

GetSum951 Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - I don't know, maybe you were asleep or hanging out at Starbucks when it happened.But try using this neat search engine called 'Google' and look for the Al Jazeera (Arabic) tape of Bin Laden not only admitting to his involvement, but bragging about it.But wait, if you're Tin Foil hat is working properly, you'll no doubt say something like, "it's probably doctored or a fake or some other Conspiracy Theory nut case argument".

GetSum951 Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - There's a reason no one wants to debate a liberal on anything. (actually several):1. They refuse to accept facts that differ from their preconceived notions, no matter the source.2. Their ideology is so ingrained that they are not capable of changing their opinion, even when confronted with overwhelming evidence.3. They love to demand you do all of their homework, by documenting every argument with links, while throwing out whacko conspiracy theory ideas, and wanting them accepted as fact.

historypoliticsbb Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - Lol, how many strawmen do you want to throw up?You use all the words that you've been programmed to, when someone questions the official version (Bush wouldn't lie, would he?) 'Tin Foil hat' - lol, how pathetic.So, yeah, let's see some evidence. You ought to know Bin Laden denied involvement:Bin Laden says he wasn't behind attacks, CNN, September 16 2001.The video you refer to was a CIA sting, accompanied with a mistranslation. The incriminating words were inserted.Do you speak Arabic?

historypoliticsbb Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - I know you think the word 'conspiracy' miraculously destroys evidence contradicting your favoured conspiracy theory, but unfortunately it doesn't. Those well known conspiracy theorists from the Guardian (including Al Qaeda expert, Jason Burke):Bin Laden videotape was result of a sting, December 16 2001guardian.co.uk/world/2001/dec/16/september11.terrorism1

BandytaCzasu Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - "its legal to kill jews"I just wrote that it was legal under the Nazi law, all right? Didn't you know that? And it was a problem to prosecute Nazis, because they technically didn't break any formal law. Not all laws are civilized. As for Bin Laden, if you put him to a trial with full observance of the law, you must consider the option of him being acquitted. Who needs this? Then he would be more dangerous - he wouldn't be in need of hiding, not from USA.Like I was defending Nazis...

GetSum951 Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - Ha Ha Ha!As I alluded to previously, you sir are too far gone to bring back to sane.Perhaps your tin foil hat is just a wee bit snug? I do not know.What I do know, is that all of you "Conspiracy Theory nut-jobs" for whatever reason, take yourselves way too seriously.So allow me to give you some cliff notes and let it go at that.1. Osama Bin Laden was behind the 9-11 attacks.2. We (The Good ol US of A) did have a total of 12 men walk on the moon, between July 20th 1969 and Dec 13th 1972.

historypoliticsbb Says:

Apr 4, 2012 - And so you change the subject to the moon, because you can't respond to my facts about 9/11, and even criticise the fact I use sources. How sad. You are yet to provide a single shred of evidence that Bin Laden was involved in 9/11.It's clear who wants to avoid the truth.

GetSum951 Says:

Apr 5, 2012 - Blah, blah, blah ... Obama's a God, blah, blah, blah ... the Republicans hate women, children and old people ... blah, blah, blah.You pseudo-intellectuals provide an almost never ending source of amusement for me.Is it the paranoia or simply being an Ideologue that makes it so easy to push your buttons?

historypoliticsbb Says:

Apr 5, 2012 - And another subject change.Still can't face the facts on 9/11 can you. (I hate Obama, the butcher of Libya btw).

af10512 Says:

Apr 6, 2012 - The blonde on the View needs a dick in the mouth

Forseliz Says:

Apr 15, 2012 - So basicaly is hasslebeck saying america should dissobey its laws? Plus shes so impolite....

Dahgrostabphri Says:

Apr 16, 2012 - tea baggers are such cowards! 

davejsmith Says:

Apr 16, 2012 - lol... Hasselbeck is stupid.

cesare1906 Says:

Apr 24, 2012 - this woman is a reason to turn gay.............SHE IS SO STUPID!!!

ReximusTyrannus Says:

Apr 27, 2012 - The US government would not want to put one of their operatives "Tim Osman" on trial.

thelateralview Says:

Apr 29, 2012 - LOL! So true! It just irks me that we killed him right away (if we REALLY killed him -- not to sound like a conspiracy person) because if we brought him to the US for a trial, we could have potentially gotten a lot of insight from him...

thelateralview Says:

Apr 29, 2012 - That's all that mouth was made for anyway...

ReximusTyrannus Says:

Apr 30, 2012 - We already knew about him. We trained him and funded him. His CIA code name was Tim Osman. He was a pawn used in fighting the Soviets. Osama was a tool used to stoke the fire of rage in this country and build support for the unjust War on Terror.

ekirent Says:

May 18, 2012 - eeeeeeh... I disagree with his statement "we were fair."The war trials had to be orchestrated to only charge the Nazis with crimes that the allies didn't commit against them. The blitz wasn't a war crime because of Dresden etc..

thelateralview Says:

May 19, 2012 - I think the Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves listening to this dumb bitch speak.

theeaglehaslandedify Says:

May 23, 2012 - Agree 100%