Scientist Proves Thermite Was Used in 911 WTC Controlled Demolition

crazymonkeyconnor Says:

Jan 26, 2012 - @Dared2DoIT Computers are developed by man and man can permit what data he chooses to sample

briteness Says:

Feb 23, 2012 - Mr. Harrit certainly appears to be respectable. He seems to know what he is talking about, and he does not appear to be lying. If he is not lying, and not wrong about the presence of nano-thermite in the rubble, it is difficult to believe the official explanation. Of course, there are many other reasons to have real doubt about the official explanation. In the end this is just one more instance of a government telling lies to motivate its people to go to war. But it still matters.

PoetryHound Says:

Feb 23, 2012 - It's interesting that Harrit says the nanothermite wouldn't have been enough to bring down the towers and that a LOT of conventional explosives would have been needed as well. That raises the problem of the lack any pattern of 130 db charges, lack of any pattern of det flashes, lack of any trace of det charges in the seismic record, lack of any destritus of det charges found in the debris, etc. etc.

pantspoopie Says:

Feb 23, 2012 - Harrit is a CIA plant. The 9/11 Truth Movement is a CIA Propaganda operation. The government runs on FEAR. They failed to prevent 9/11. To cover this and to make them seem hyper-competent the CIA started the 9/11 Truth Movement. FACTS:1. Every single 9/11 Truth Movement media (websites, etc) LISTS THE EXACT SAME TALKING POINTS.2. Such coordination across EVERY SINGLE MEDIUM AT THE SAME TIME suggests a massive effort.3. Such a massive effort at propaganda is a classic CIA operation.

bluerap04 Says:

Feb 27, 2012 - What other possible reason could there be that they found nanothermite in the dust?Couldn't there have been so much nanothermite that they simply didn't need a large amount of other types of explosives?

PoetryHound Says:

Feb 28, 2012 - According to Harrit himself, a large amount of other explosives WERE needed. And there isn't evidence of such a thing. That was my point.

bluerap04 Says:

Feb 28, 2012 - Maybe there isn't. But the thermite was clearly there. So it must be asked..1) Why is thermite found in all those dust samples, and more importantly, 2) why didn't NIST ever test for thermite, let alone address the matter in their reports?

bluerap04 Says:

Feb 28, 2012 - Here's just my hypothesis, and I admit I could be wrong (I'm no expert), but maybe the thermite was powerful enough to destroy almost all physical evidence of other explosives. We all saw how much dust there was, and Harrit clearly explains that nanothermite is incredibly powerful.As far as sound goes, it could be that 1) the use of thermite decreased the normal amount of explosives needed, and 2) there were still plenty of bangs heard: /watch?v=ERhoNYj9_fg

ctcole77 Says:

Mar 5, 2012 - @bluerap042/28/2012Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific Consultants"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments.""There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

bilfrado Says:

Mar 8, 2012 - Good point2 airplanes took down 3 independent buildings.

xFogxofxWarx Says:

Mar 14, 2012 - The fires did not need to be hot enough to melt steel. Even Niels Harrit, the scientist in this video accepts the temperature of fires would have been upwards of 1800 F. At 1800 F, steel is at less than 10% of it's strength. Even at 1100 it is less than 50%. This is sufficient to cause collapse. The towers fell straight down because it's the only way they could fall. It's not possible for them to tip over. That's pure fantasy. Talk to a demolitions expert.

GENIUS99999992345678 Says:

Mar 28, 2012 - I guess all the sulfer in the thermate got burned up, blown away, or they just didn't find any as sulfer would be like talcum powder.

GENIUS99999992345678 Says:

Mar 28, 2012 - naw, i'm crazy, i'm gonna go out like the guy who got Gregory Peck in "The Gunfighter". HOW 'BOUT IT RINGO!!!!!!

sniped101 Says:

Apr 24, 2012 - damn, i feel really late. This is old news from 09?!?! goodness... this video should have more views...

gregrutz Says:

Apr 30, 2012 - Funny, I saw an airplane crash into the building. Hmmmm?

AUSTDOG1 Says:

May 1, 2012 - Open your eyes America!!! the patriot act needed 911... who has profited the most out of the `war on terror`? ... its not too late to WAKE UP!!

ctcole77 Says:

May 8, 2012 - Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific ConsultantsWTC Dust Study2/28/2012"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments." "There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

g779g7t6 Says:

May 10, 2012 - Don't you rather want to know why you believe that nano-thermite did it when Dr. Millette's dust study has proven that there was no nano-thermite?

USAUSA172 Says:

May 21, 2012 - Just wanted to ask again how do three steel an concrete buildings collapse and fall through the path of greatest resistance due to planes crashing into them an fire.Obviously this special jihadaviation fuel that melts steel .But leaves people wandering around the impact holes thar some powerful selective refined oil.

logicCplusplus Says:

May 24, 2012 - There is a video on Youtube that demonstrates low quantities of tightly coupled normal thermite of 1.5 pounds is enough to cut through a column of steel. 9/11 was not a Controlled Demolition it was simply a demolition whose main purpose was to weaken the structure in order for a collapse to occur. The use of thermite (or even better nano-thermite) ensured it was as non-indicative of a controlled demolition as possible, keep things quiet.

logicCplusplus Says:

May 24, 2012 - You people all seem to be watching the WRONG videos./watch?v=LNOM_U5UM6Q&lc